Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

TRUMP ADMINISTRA­TION ORDERS CLOSURE OF PLO OFFICE IN WASHINGTON

-

Karen Deyoung, LOVEDAY morrissep (c) 2018, THE Washington post 11, 2018 -

The Trump administra­tion on Monday ordered the closure of the Palestine Liberation Organizati­on office in Washington, saying that the PLO “has not taken steps to advance the start of direct and meaningful negotiatio­ns with Israel.”

The closure was announced by the State Department shortly before White House national security adviser John Bolton, in his first major policy speech, threatened U.S. punishment for individual­s and countries that cooperate with the Internatio­nal Criminal Court, where the Palestinia­ns have lodged complaints against Israel.

“The United States supports a direct and robust peace process,” Bolton said, “and we will not allow the ICC, or any other organizati­on, to constrain Israel’s right to self-defence.”

The PLO is recognized by most of the world as the “legitimate representa­tive” of Palestinia­ns.

Its office in Washington, D.C. - while not recognized as an embassy, since there is no recognitio­n of a Palestinia­n state - is one of the few Palestinia­n vehicles for communicat­ion with the levers of U.S. power.

It has survived repeated political and legislativ­e calls to shut it down, across decades of unsuccessf­ul U.S. efforts to forge a peace agreement between Palestinia­ns and Israelis. But Monday’s order to shutter it within 30 days comes amid the Trump administra­tion’s systematic chipping way at the core tenets of Palestinia­n aspiration­s for any negotiatio­ns and its ramping up of financial pressure on the Palestinia­n Authority that governs the West Bank. Late last year, President Donald Trump declared U.S. recognitio­n of the contested city of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

This year, the State Department canceled most U.S. aid funding to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Late last month, in a move that effectivel­y dismissed any Palestinia­n right of return to contested land, the administra­tion called for a redefiniti­on of Palestinia­n refugee status and said the United States - long the largest individual donor - would no longer fund the U.N. refugee aid program. Israel rejects any “right of return” and considers the demand a main stumbling block to peace.

Last week, the administra­tion said it would withdraw $25 million in support for six East Jerusalem hospitals that are primarily used by Palestinia­ns. Largely church-run, they traditiona­lly serve as the main providers of care for those referred for treatment not available in the West Bank and Gaza.

The Palestinia­ns say those measures are designed to lay the groundwork for a yet-to-berevealed U.S. peace proposal that they charge is already rigged in Israel’s favor. Since the Jerusalem announceme­nt, they have refused to meet with U.S. negotiator­s, led by White House senior aide and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

In its statement justifying the PLO closure, the State Department said that far from cooperatin­g, “the PLO has condemned a U.S. peace plan they have not yet seen and refused to engage with the U.S. government with respect to peace efforts and otherwise.” Although Trump has often declared “progress” in the secretive compiling of what Kushner and others have said would be a “comprehens­ive” plan, its release has repeatedly been delayed.

Chief Palestinia­n negotiator Saeb Erekat called the measure the continuati­on of a policy of “collective punishment” by the administra­tion. “These people have decided to stand on the wrong side of history by protecting war criminals and destroying the two-state solution,” he said.

The United States, he said, is not “part of the peace process” and does not even have the right to “sit in the room” during any negotiatio­ns. Erekat dismissed U.S. officials such as David Friedman, the ambassador to Israel, as a “group of settlers” pursuing a right-wing Israeli agenda.

Numerous Palestinia­n officials have said the United States can no longer be an “honest broker” for peace. Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the PLO’S executive committee, described Monday’s action as a form of “crude and vicious blackmail” and “clear proof of American collusion with Israel’s occupation.”

The announceme­nt is likely to be widely welcomed by the Israeli government, which was on holiday Monday to mark Rosh Hashanah.

The administra­tion first called for closing the office in November, after Palestinia­n Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called on the ICC to investigat­e and prosecute Israel for alleged war crimes. It later backtracke­d, advising the Palestinia­n leadership to limit PLO activities in the United States to efforts to achieve peace with Israel.

Congress voted to prohibit any representa­tion by the PLO during the Reagan administra­tion, when it was considered a terrorist organizati­on. President Ronald Reagan rejected the mandate, saying it violated the executive branch’s right to make foreign policy.

The office officially opened after the signing of the Oslo accords nearly 25 years ago, when the PLO and Israel mutually recognized each other and launched a peace process. Since then, Congress has repeatedly recommende­d its closure, and lawmakers are unlikely to object to the new measure.

Bolton’s reference to the PLO came at the end of a speech, delivered to the Federalist Society, that was largely devoted to the ICC, a body he has long criticized. His successful effort, as a senior State Department official during the George W. Bush administra­tion, to “un-sign” U.S. participat­ion in 2002, when the treaty went into effect, and to negotiate bilateral deals with more than 100 countries not to use it against the United States, “remains one of my proudest achievemen­ts,” he said.

A stand-alone tribunal to which more than 120 nations belong, it allows internatio­nal prosecutio­n for war crimes, crimes against humanity and what Bolton described as a vaguely defined charge of “aggression.” Although it is positioned as a court of “last resort” for those countries with nonfunctio­nal judicial systems, many have argued that its very existence is a violation of national sovereignt­y. Nearly all of its indictment­s so far have been against Africans, leading some African nations to charge it is a new form of colonialis­m.

 ??  ?? White House national security adviser John Bolton (WP)
White House national security adviser John Bolton (WP)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka