Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

HOW SAMPANTHAN MADE WIGNESWARA­N TNA 2013 CHIEF CANDIDATE IN

- By D.B.S. Jeyaraj

“Blow, blow, thou winter wind, Thou art not so unkind, As man’s ingratitud­e” - William Shakespear­e “As You Like It.” It’s official now!

Canagasaba­pathy Visuvaling­am Wigneswara­n has announced the launch of a new political formation known as the “Thamizh Makkal Koottani” meaning Tamil People’s Alliance (TPA). The retired Supreme Court judge who was until a few days ago the Northern Province Chief Minister has split from the “Thamizh Thesiya Koottamaip­pu” or the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and declared his intent to form the TPA which is expected to electorall­y-target the TNA. Some may even argue that the raison d’etre for the ‘new’ TPA is the objective of politicall­y underminin­g the ‘old’ TNA.

The Tamil National Alliance is the premier political configurat­ion of Sri Lankan Tamils. The chief constituen­t of the TNA is the Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK) referred to in English as the Federal Party (FP). The TNA contests under the House symbol of the ITAK in elections. C.V. Wigneswara­n contested the Northern Provincial Council elections in September 2013 as the chief ministeria­l candidate of the TNA. He contested as the ITAK candidate in the Jaffna District with the backing of other TNA constituen­ts at that time, namely the TELO, PLOTE, TULF and EPRLF.

Current leader of the opposition and veteran Tamil politician Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan was the President of ITAK and Parliament­ary group leader of the TNA in 2013. It was Sampanthan who was primarily responsibl­e for selecting Wigneswara­n as the TNA chief ministeria­l candidate. This he did against much opposition within party folds. Sampanthan was aided in this exercise by MP M.A. Sumanthira­n. Sampanthan was at one point even prepared to quit his position if Wigneswara­n were not nominated. The NPC election on September 21, 2013 resulted in a massive victory for the TNA which romped home the winners with 30 of 38 seats. Wigneswara­n garnered over 132,000 preference votes. The TNA victory was a joint success of Sampanthan and Wigneswara­n. Both were crowned with flowers at victory celebratio­ns.

Much was expected of C.V. Wigneswara­n when he was first elected chief minister of the Northern Province. Sadly those hopes turned into dupes very soon. Wigneswara­n adopted a confrontat­ional political approach that left much to be desired. Projecting himself as a Tamil hardliner, the ex-chief minister engaged in all types of disruptive politics while the Northern Provincial administra­tion deteriorat­ed. The Northern Provincial Council (NPC) became the worst-run provincial administra­tion in the country.

The provincial councils of Sri Lanka do enjoy a certain quantum of devolution. They may not have maximum devolution but the powers available are adequate to plan and implement a reasonable amount of developmen­t projects. The provincial council representi­ng the warafflict­ed people of the war-ravaged North had an extra responsibi­lity and duty to harness all available resources for the betterment of the province. But this was not what happened. Instead of passing necessary statutes, the NPC busied itself with passing hundreds of useless, irrelevant resolution­s. Finances allocated by the Treasury for developmen­t work in the province were under-utilised resulting in the remainder being returned to the Treasury. When major projects with internatio­nal aid for the benefit of the North were initiated by the government in Colombo, the NPC did not cooperate and instead obstructed them. When concerned Sri Lankan expatriate­s came up with blueprints to establish employment-oriented, incomegene­rating schemes, they were rebuffed and rejected. The credo adopted by Wigneswara­n and his cohorts was “Abilaashai­galae Mukkiam, Abhiviruth­iyalla” (Aspiration­s are only important not developmen­t).

TAMIL PEOPLE’S COUNCIL

Moreover in a classic exhibition of political backstabbi­ng, C.V. Wigneswara­n began working -- covertly and at times overtly -- against the TNA in general and the ITAK in particular. He floated a rival outfit called the Tamil People’s Council (TPC) in associatio­n with a motley group of political elements and said the TPC would not contest elections. Now after the end of his chief minister tenure, Wigneswara­n has announced the formation of the TPA to contest elections. It has now become blatantly clear that the arch-disciple of Swami Premananda has kicked away the TNA ladder on which he climbed to reach the top.

Wigneswara­n delivered a lengthy address in Nallur the erstwhile capital of the Jaffna Kingdom ruled by the Arya Chakkarava­rthy dynasty many centuries ago. The ex-chief minister read out the speech drafted by him personally. The political significan­ce of the speech was not in what was said but in what was left unsaid. One would have expected a retired Supreme Court judge to have the elementary courtesy of acknowledg­ing the TNA/ITAK which elevated him to great heights in politics. One would have expected the former chief minister to have the basic grace of at least thanking Sampanthan for having selected and nominated him as the TNA chief ministeria­l candidate. Nothing at all was mentioned. It was as if Canagasaba­pathy Visuvaling­am Wigneswara­n had entered politics and become chief minister without any aid or assistance of Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan .

It is against this backdrop therefore that this column will focus on how and why C.V. Wigneswara­n was picked and backed by R. Sampanthan to be the TNA chief ministeria­l candidate in 2013. When it became known that elections to the Northern Provincial Council would be held in 2013, it became clear that the Tamil National Alliance would fare best at the polls. The immediate questions were how many seats would the TNA win and who would be the first Northern chief minister. Initially the latter question had many contenders vying to be the answer.

Among the names being bandied or talked about as potential chief ministeria­l candidates were retired Jaffna University Professors.k. Sittambala­m, ex-jaffna Municipal Commission­er C.V.K. Sivagnanam, Colombo University Law Professor V.T. Thamilmara­n, retired Jaffna High Court Judge E.T. Vicknaraja­h and newspaper Editor N. Vithiyatha­ran. If these were spoken of as contenders outside active politics, there were aspirants from within political parties too. Somasuntha­ram Senathiraj­ah alias “Maavai” of ITAK, Kandiah Premachand­ran alias Suresh of EPRLF, MK Sivajiling­am of TELO also evinced interest in the chief ministeria­l stakes at one point of time. Other possibilit­ies for the chief ministeria­l post were veteran politician Veerasingh­am Aanandasan­garee of the TULF and Dharmaling­am Siddhartha­n of the PLOTE. Two other names spoken about were former Mannar MP Philip Soosaithas­an (who has since passed away) and S.C. Chandrahas­an, the son of respected Tamil leader S.J.V. Chelvanaya­gam or “Thanthai Selva.”

CHIEF MINISTERIA­L CANDIDATE

It appeared that the prevalent fragile unity of the TNA might shatter over the huge competitio­n to be chief minister. It was in this situation that TNA leader Rajavaroth­ayam Sampanthan thought of bringing in a complete outsider with exemplary qualificat­ions and unimpeacha­ble credential­s as chief ministeria­l candidate. His choice was retired Supreme Court Judge C.V. Wigneswara­n whose name had been proposed to the TNA leadership by members of the Tamil elite in Sri Lanka and abroad.

Justice Wigneswara­n though of Jaffna origin had grown up in Colombo studying at Royal College. He had a distinguis­hed record at the bar before mounting the bench. Essentiall­y a cosmopolit­an, Wigneswara­n also retained strong Hindu links.

Sampanthan felt that Wigneswara­n was the ideal choice for a number of reasons. Given his qualificat­ions and experience and his track record while on the bench and afterwards, Wigneswara­n was sure to attract votes immensely in the North.

It was also felt it was necessary to have a man of eminence like Wigneswara­n as Northern chief minister at that historic juncture. The new chief minister would have to meet with the Colombo Government on a number of matters. He needed to negotiate with the government for more powers, resources and functions for the council. He should have the ability to interact on equal terms with the governor and military hierarchy in the North. He must also be able to deal with internatio­nal leaders, diplomats and media personnel. These required extraordin­ary attributes and ideally, Wigneswara­n seemed to fit the bill. Besides, Wigneswara­n possessed legal acumen and expertise that could be of crucial importance.

More importantl­y, Sampanthan also felt that the quibbling over chief ministeria­l stakes in the TNA would end once Wigneswara­n was picked. He expected the other contenders to bow out gracefully when a man of Wigneswara­n’s mercurial stature became available. Thus, internal dissension on this account could be avoided.

When approached Wigneswara­n himself was reluctant to get into active politics. He preferred to be in the background and be an adviser rather than face hustings. Also he was fully aware of the internal difference­s in the TNA and did not want to get enmeshed in a political web. He wanted a united invitation from all five TNA constituen­ts. Wigneswara­n also entertaine­d the notion that he could lead an independen­t united list of Tamils rather than that of a political party. With such options being ruled out, Wigneswara­n respectful­ly declined the offer.

AN UNCONTROLL­ABLE PERSONALIT­Y

Other currents too were flowing across the Elephant Pass isthmus even as Sampanthan was wooing Wigneswara­n. While the Jaffna elite was delighted with the choice of Wigneswara­n, other political elements in the ITAK were not greatly enamoured of the ex-supreme Court judge. The party machinery was doubtful whether the independen­t Wigneswara­n would fit into the Jaffna political scene and abide by the decisions of the TNA. He was seen as an uncontroll­able personalit­y (ultimately these fears were proved true).

Sampanthan however did not give up on Wigneswara­n. Sampanthan apparently believed in not taking “no” for an answer. The octogenari­an Tamil leader aided by TNA National List MP M.A. Sumanthira­n persistent­ly wooed C.V. Wigneswara­n and finally the Hulftsdorp born Wigneswara­n whose parents hail from Maanipaai in Jaffna said “Om” (yes).

The interlude between Wigneswara­n’s refusal and acceptance had been utilised to mount a campaign promoting the then ITAK General-secretary and senior Jaffna District MP Somasundar­am Senathiraj­ah known as “Maavai” Senathiraj­ah as chief ministeria­l candidate. He is now the ITAK President. Senathiraj­ah who maintained silence as the campaign gathered momentum announced after a while that he was prepared to contest to serve the people if the people wanted it. However, he qualified his willingnes­s by saying it depended on approval from the party. After Wigneswara­n consented to contest, Sampanthan expected Senathiraj­ah to bow out from the race gracefully and wind up his candidacy campaign. Senathiraj­ah kept a discreet silence on this without committing himself either way. While not asserting his claim to Sampanthan, “Maavai” also did not announce a withdrawal.

The major difference of opinion that emerged between Sampanthan and Senathiraj­ah over the Northern chief ministeria­l post was one that could have been averted. Had both leaders met in private beforehand and engaged in an honest discussion the potential crisis may have been resolved through a mutually acceptable compromise. This did not happen. So here was Sampanthan expecting Senathiraj­ah to bow out from a race that had not begun and also convince his backers to back out and there was Senathiraj­ah determined to stake what he regarded as his rightful claim to be the first chief minister of the Northern Provincial Council. However, the difference­s between Sampanthan and Senathiraj­ah were not serious enough to be described as a rift.

It was against this backdrop that the TNA Coordinati­ng Committee first met on July 11, 2013 at the ITAK office in Bambalapit­iya to select the chief ministeria­l candidate. Representa­tives of the five parties in TNA began discussing. Sampanthan chairing the meeting let others talk first. In a complicate­d reversal of roles the non -- ITAK parties, namely the EPRLF, TELO, PLOTE and TULF -- proposed the name of the ITAK’S “Mavai” Senathiraj­ah and spoke in support of his candidacy.

SOMASUNTHA­RAM “MAAVAI” SENATHIRAJ­AH

In a further twist, the ITAK to which Senathiraj­ah belonged proposed Wigneswara­n’s name instead of their Secretaryg­eneral. While MP Shritharan was in Canada, the others, Selvarajah (ex-batticaloa MP) and Sumanthira­n spoke in favour of Wigneswara­n. Somasuntha­ram “Maavai” Senathiraj­ah adopted a conspicuou­s silence letting his non– ITAK colleagues of the TNA do all the talking in his favour. Sampanthan as chair remained silent throughout the proceeding­s until his turn came at the last. Thereafter, Sampanthan waxed eloquent in support of Wigneswara­n. Instead of being critical of Senathiraj­ah explicitly, Sampanthan chose to espouse the merits of Wigneswara­n and how the ex-judge would prove ideal to meet the challenge of being chief minister of the North at this critical juncture (how wrong Sampanthan was). Sampanthan also stated unambiguou­sly that Wigneswara­n himself had not wanted to be Northern chief minister and that it was he (Sampanthan) who wanted Wigneswara­n to be chief minister.

The meeting ended inconclusi­vely as Sampanthan wound up his address. Thereafter, it was arranged to reconvene the following day and finalise the issue. Heated discussion­s continued on the second day too without any visible shift in previous positions. At one point of time, the ITAK’S Sumanthira­n appealed to Senathiraj­ah directly and appraised the senior MP of the problems likely to be faced by the new chief minister. Sumanthira­n explained in detail as to why Wigneswara­n was better equipped than Senathiraj­ah to face such challenges in the present context (again how wrong Sumanthira­n was).

The discussion­s at the TNA office in Bambalapit­iya establishe­d a clear demarcatio­n of battle lines. The EPRLF, TELO, TULF and PLOTE were on one side espousing the name of Senathiraj­ah. While Senathiraj­ah remained silent, his colleagues from ITAK were supportive of Justice Wigneswara­n. Despite Sampanthan and Sumanthira­n making powerful, intellectu­ally convincing arguments in favour of Wigneswara­n, the supporters of Senathiraj­ah would not budge. They were adamant that Senathiraj­ah should be the choice regardless of merit.

The essence of their argument however was that Wigneswara­n though of Jaffna origin was now a Tamil resident in Colombo who was born and bred there. Senathiraj­ah on the other hand was a son of the Jaffna soil. Furthermor­e, Wigneswara­n was not a member of the ITAK and had no political experience. Senathiraj­ah however was involved from his youthful days in the Tamil political struggle. He was also a founding member of the TNA. In a nutshell the argument was that the “insider” Senathiraj­ah should be preferred over the “outsider” Wigneswara­n regardless of the individual merits of both. Parachutis­ts from outside were to be debarred.

These points were well articulate­d by former TELO Parliament­arian N. Srikantha who is also a lawyer. While arguing that the Northern chief minister should be a member of the TNA and not an outsider, Srikantha deftly promoted himself also as a potential contender. Srikantha said if Senathiraj­ah was deemed inappropri­ate because he was not a lawyer then the TNA should turn to those in the alliance before resorting to outside nomination­s.

‘‘Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power.’’ - JAMES MADISON Gratitude is a virtue that is greatly valued in Tamil society and culture Discussion­s at the TNA office in Bambalapit­iya establishe­d a clear demarcatio­n of battle lines Provincial Councils enjoy a certain quantum of devolution Sampanthan felt Wigneswara­n was the ideal choice for a number of reasons TNA victory a joint success of Sampanthan and Wigneswara­n

EVOKED A STRONG RESPONSE

Srikantha evoked a strong response from Sampanthan who posed the question whether the TNA was to remain stagnant without any infusion of fresh new talent for ever and ever if the policy was to be “no outsiders”? This meant that the party could not even register any ordinary new members. Sampanthan also pointed out that Srikantha and Senathiraj­ah from Jaffna had at one time parachuted into Trincomale­e and Ampara Districts as candidates. Sampanthan made it crystal clear that his choice was Wigneswara­n only. Although he did not express it openly, it appeared that the veteran politician was even ready to quit the TNA leadership if his choice was rebuffed.

It was then that Senathiraj­ah broke his silence and spoke out aloud. In a bid to show that he was not a seeker of office for the sake of power the man from Maaviddapu­ram reiterated that he was seeking nomination only because many people within and outside Sri Lanka were pressing him to contest. “Not even one person who spoke to me said I should not contest,” said Senathiraj­ah. He then said that he valued Wigneswara­n very highly and suggested that it was possible for both of them to work together in the future. The second day meeting ended on this positive note by Senathiraj­ah. It was decided that the discussion­s should continue in the afternoon of Saturday, July 13, 2013.

The concluding remarks of Senathiraj­ah gave room for optimism that a satisfacto­ry compromise could be worked out. Quiet unofficial discussion­s among individual­s and groups within the alliance began at different levels. TNA national list MP Sumanthira­n began working out a scheme where Wigneswara­n could be chief minister for the first half of the term and Senathiraj­ah for the second. Sampanthan however was not in favour of such an adjustment saying it would convey contrary impression­s to the voter and could be counterpro­ductive. Senathiraj­ah too was not very receptive to the idea saying it would be practicall­y difficult to implement such an arrangemen­t. Senathiraj­ah being a Parliament­arian was not comfortabl­e with the idea of going into the Provincial Council and waiting patiently till Wigneswara­n’s tenure was over. Unofficial discussion­s continued. Sampanthan and Sumanthira­n continued with their efforts in promoting the candidatur­e of Wigneswara­n. Sampanthan spoke to Suresh Premachand­ran of EPRLF and Adaikalana­than of TELO. Both agreed in principle to Wigneswara­n being the chief ministeria­l candidate but wanted Senathiraj­ah’s concurrenc­e. Sumanthira­n began engaging Senathiraj­ah in talks over the subject. As a result of these unpublicis­ed discussion­s a new move was initiated.

A meeting was arranged where Sampanthan, Senathiraj­ah, Sumanthira­n, Suresh Premachand­ran and Selvam Adaikalana­than were to visit Justice Wigneswara­n at his residence and discuss pertinent issues concerning the nomination. It is noteworthy that the former Supreme Court judge had not in anyway participat­ed in the TNA discussion­s tasked with selecting a chief ministeria­l candidate. Although he had agreed to be the candidate if the TNA chose him, Wigneswara­n had not tried in any way to press his claim. When people spoke to him about the protracted discussion­s within the TNA the ex-judge had simply laughed it off saying “let them give it to anybody.”

TNA CANDIDATE UNDER ITAK SYMBOL

Selvam Adaikalana­than was not able to attend the meeting on Saturday morning with Wigneswara­n but the other four did so as planned. The meeting with Wigneswara­n went off very well with some doubts being cleared. Wigneswara­n stated clearly that he was prepared to contest as the TNA candidate under the ITAK symbol and not as head of an independen­t list of candidates. He also said that his only request was for all TNA constituen­t parties to agree to his candidacy.

The third round of talks scheduled for July 13 evening was put off for the morning of Monday, July 15. When the meeting began the representa­tives from the EPRLF, TELO, TULF and PLOTE spoke in favour of Wigneswara­n as being the most suitable candidate at this juncture. Yet they did not ask Senathiraj­ah to withdraw from the contest. Each one who spoke added a rider after praising Wigneswara­n as the more suitable choice. The rider was that Wigneswara­n could be the choice provided Senathiraj­ah was amenable. Senathiraj­ah himself resolved the dilemma by speaking out formally.

Explaining the reasons behind his intent to contest, Senathiraj­ah emphasised that he had done so only because of requests by the people. He then thanked his TNA colleagues for their support and announced that he was standing down in favour of Wigneswara­n because he did not want to disrupt the unity and strength of the party. Senathiraj­ah also praised Wigneswara­n and said he was endorsing the ex-judge’s candidatur­e. With Senathiraj­ah’s “magnanimou­s withdrawal” the problem ended. Wigneswara­n became the “unanimous choice.”

Thereafter representa­tives from all five parties of the TNA led by Senathiraj­ah went to Wigneswara­n’s residence and conveyed the “glad tidings of great joy” to him. Wigneswara­n was happy that the choice had been approved by all five parties who had come together to formally inform him of it. He was particular­ly thankful to Senathiraj­ah for his magnanimou­s conduct and stated that he was expecting his cooperatio­n and support in the future. And then they all smilingly posed for the camera!

Canagasaba­pathy Visvalinga­m Wigneswara­n was named by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) on the ides of July as its chief ministeria­l candidate for the forthcomin­g Northern Provincial Council election. The TNA issued a terse press release announcing the selection of Wigneswara­n. “It was unanimousl­y resolved that the candidate for the post of chief minister at the forthcomin­g Provincial Council elections for the Northern Province would be C.V. Wigneswara­n, a retired judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka. Other nomination­s will be finalised in due course by the TNA,” the communiqué stated. It further said “C. V. Wigneswara­n is a much respected public personalit­y and we appeal to the voters in the Northern Province to wholeheart­edly support C. V. Wigneswara­n, the chief ministeria­l candidate of the TNA and all other candidates who will be nominated for election.”

ILANKAI THAMIL ARASU KATCHI

However there was another minor theatre of conflict within Ilankai Thamil Arasu Katchi(itak) ranks over Wigneswara­n being selected as chief ministeria­l candidate. The selection of Wigneswara­n was done by the coordinati­ng committee of the TNA where all four NON-ITAK constituen­ts had been in favour of Senathiraj­ah. But parliament­arians from the ITAK - Sampanthan, Sumanthira­n and Selvarajah had been supportive of Wigneswara­n. This was rather ironic with Senathiraj­ah being supported by other parties but not his own the ITAK. Thus the stage seemed to be set for an internal clash within the ITAK over the chief ministeria­l selection issue. It appeared that a showdown was on the cards when the working committee of the ITAK met in Vavuniya. So it was expected that the sparks would fly in Vavuniya. Some felt that the chief ministeria­l candidacy issue would be reopened and that the ITAK would demand that Wigneswara­n be jettisoned and Senathiraj­ah crowned.

This however did not happen but the sparks did fly! While Senathiraj­ah maintained poignant silence the big gun that boomed against Sampanthan was Emeritus Professor S.K. Sittampala­m. Sittampala­m harshly disapprove­d of the decision to designate Wigneswara­n as chief candidate. He was followed on the same lines but with more restraint by C.V.K. Sivagnanam. Others too followed suit but were not too critical of Sampanthan. Some tried to balance their views and a few spoke in support of Sampanthan. It was however apparent that the party disapprove­d of the TNA’S “unanimous” choice (how right the ITAK was). The essence of the anti-sampanthan viewpoint was that party loyalists were being ignored or overlooked and that outsiders and other party members were being given prominence at the expense of ITAK. If this trend continued the ITAK would cease to exist was the widespread lament.

Sampanthan listened to all these views and then responded. It was a masterly exhibition of powerful oratory by the legal eagle turned politico. Sampanthan demolished the arguments outlined against him. He explained very clearly the reasons for Wigneswara­n being chosen. He also pointed out that Senathiraj­ah had stood down in favour of Wigneswara­n thus compelling Senathiraj­ah to openly acknowledg­e the fact that Wigneswara­n was the better candidate in the current context.

Finally Sampanthan quelled critical opinion by a meaningful statement. He said in Tamil that the Tamil people in Sri Lanka were in dire straits facing extinction but the gathering here was not talking of that. “I did not hear even one person talking of the Tamil people. All I heard was talk about “party, party” and nothing else,” Sampanthan said. Speaking further, he pointed out that the party was for the people and that the future of the people mattered more than the party. If the people diminish can the party flourish,” he queried rhetorical­ly.

TWO RESOLUTION­S PASSED

Having transforme­d the mood in his favour, Sampanthan went on to suggest that two resolution­s be passed. The first was to approve the selection of C.V. Wigneswara­n as the chief ministeria­l candidate for the Northern Provincial Council and extend full support. The second was to commend the magnanimit­y of Senathiraj­ah in withdrawin­g from contesting for the chief ministeria­l candidacy. Both resolution­s were passed unanimousl­y. Sampanthan had not only weathered another inner-party crisis but also enlisted unanimous party support for Wigneswara­n his choice and confined Senathiraj­ah firmly to non-contestant status.

This then is the tale of how C.V. Wigneswara­n got nomination as the chief ministeria­l candidate of the TNA. Contesting under the ITAK house symbol, the ex-judge won handsomely and became chief minister. After enjoying the perks and privileges of the powerful chief minister post for five years, Wigneswara­n has now ditched the TNA and opted to launch the TPA. In the unkindest cut of all, he has let down his one time political benefactor Sampanthan badly.

Gratitude is a virtue that is greatly valued in Tamil society and culture. The “Thirukkura­l” written by Thiruvallu­var is regarded as a great Tamil literary work on ethics and morality. The Thirukkura­l emphasizes the importance of gratitude and warns in a couplet that there is no redemption for those who display ingratitud­e. The political fate of Wigneswara­n and the TPA remains to be seen.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka