Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

LET NO ONE DISTORT THE WILL OF THE SOVEREIGN PEOPLE

- By Ameen Izzadeen

Tomorrow’s presidenti­al election is a D-day. It is the day on which we should feel that we are the true kings and queens of this county as we exercise our franchise to elect our chief servant. In Sri Lanka, we take pride of being Asia’s oldest democracy. We first exercised universal suffrage in 1931, four years after it was introduced in Britain. In Article 3, Sri Lanka’s present constituti­on states that sovereignt­y is in the people and is inalienabl­e. In explaining what sovereignt­y is, the article says it includes the powers of government, fundamenta­l rights and franchise.

The Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights also recognises franchise as an inalienabl­e right of citizens. The declaratio­n’s Article 21 says, “Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his/her country, directly or through freely chosen representa­tives. …The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot or by equivalent free voting procedures.”

The people’s right to elect their government is also emphasised in the Internatio­nal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Sri Lanka is a signatory. The fact that human rights charters give pride of place to franchise highlights how important universal suffrage is.

Any distortion of the will of the people or any attempt to prevent the sovereign people from exercising their franchise is a serious crime. It is tantamount to a coup against the sovereign.

However much democratic nations’ constituti­ons and world human rights charters hold universal suffrage as supreme, politician­s, driven by their greed to win elections at any cost, continue to distort the will of the people with impunity.

This is happening even in the United States where the culprits are often Republican Party politician­s. It was through the well calculated disenfranc­hisement of hundreds of thousands of Afro Americans on the basis of their past criminal records that President George W. Bush won the 2000 presidenti­al election. It is alleged even today that in many states where the Republican­s control the local legislatur­e, laws are passed to make voter registrati­on difficult for Afro-americans, Asian Americans and Hispanics, who are more likely to vote for the Democratic Party. In addition to disenfranc­hisement of likely Democrats, the people’s democratic will is also distorted by fake news campaigns on Facebook and foreign power interventi­on as seen in Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory.

In Sri Lanka, we may brag about being the oldest Asian democracy, but look at our shameful record of distorting the people’s will. In 1981, there was mass scale election rigging during the District Developmen­t Council elections in the north. It is said that one of the factors which triggered the 30-year separatist war was the criminal distortion of the northern people’s will during that election. Then we have this infamous 2010 presidenti­al election, which stands out as an example how an election should not be held. It is alleged that the then election commission­er went missing for several hours while the counting was on and that a political party strongman was seen inside the election secretaria­t. After an extraordin­ary delay, during which rumours about a computer jilmart (manipulati­on) gathered pace, the missing election commission­er appeared to declare Mahinda Rajapaksa as the winner and explain he had to conduct the election under a severe ‘Athathiya’ (tension). Months later, in a garbage dump, bundles of half burnt ballot papers marked for the ‘losing’ candidate Sarath Fonseka were found. The United National Party’s then deputy leader, Karu Jayasuriya, made a complaint to the police, but as with many complaints that require questionin­g of the strong and the mighty, this complaint too lies in the police morgue. Also during the 2010 election, many people, especially those from the UNP citadel of Colombo Central’s Keselwatte area, complained their names had been struck off the voter register.

Similar allegation­s have surfaced this time, too. It is said that in Colombo and suburbs, several voters have complained that their names are not on the voter list. Some insisted that they had handed over their duly filled registrati­on forms to their Grama Niladharis. It is alleged that unscrupulo­us Grama Niladharis deliberate­ly deleted the names of voters who are likely to vote for a particular party.

Given the dishonesty of most of our politician­s and officials, we the citizens should learn to outsmart them at every turn. We need to hand over the voter registrati­on forms on time and check whether our names are on the list when the National Election Commission uploads the list on its website. Usually, the NEC gives a grace period during which those who find their names are not on the list can take corrective measures as spelt out by the NEC.

Allegation­s that Grama Niladharis were disenfranc­hising likely voters of a particular party were also found in a media statement released by NEC commission­er Ratnajeeva­n Hoole. He also alleges that certain Returning Officers and Assistant/ Deputy Election Commission­ers are biased and raised concerns about the integrity of the election process. He also draws attention to certain people who are carrying out a misinforma­tion campaign in the East. “I am nervous about the election. I am in the East after giving lectures on how to vote. The pro-boycott forces are telling people the wrong way to vote. Those in the East who want a change of party are also teaching people the wrong way to vote,” he says.prof. Hoole says he has called on the authoritie­s to suspend these officials.

If these allegation­s are true, they amount to bureaucrat­ic violence against the citizens’ right to vote. There is little evidence that NEC Chief Mahinda Deshapriya has heeded the advice of his fellow commission­er, with whom he is said to be having difference­s of opinion over various issues.

Mr. Deshapriya was hailed as the man of the match for his attempt at making the election process fool proof during the 2015 presidenti­al election. But this time around, he has come under flak for not acting decisively against errant media organisati­ons for blatantly violating his guidelines. When asked, he attributes his helplessne­ss to the lacuna in the laws. This was also his reply when he was asked about a controvers­y over an affidavit. Playing blame game won’t assure a free and fair poll, but the implementa­tion of the law in spirit and letter will. But this does not mean we should not give the NEC the credit it deserves. The NEC chief has ensured that the campaign period was largely peaceful. This was also due to the cooperatio­n candidates have extended to him. But he needs to do much more to guarantee that the sovereign people’s will is not distorted or robbed by an unscrupulo­us politician with the help of corrupt officials.

To do this, what better time than now when we face a crucial election and when democracy lovers worldwide mourn the death of India’s former election chief T.N. Seshan who carried out a determined campaign to cleanse India’s corrupt electoral process.

Can Mr. Deshpariya win the man of the match award this time too?

 ??  ?? The 2015 presidenti­al election’s man of the match: NEC Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya gestures as he speaks during a press conference on Wednesday. AFP
The 2015 presidenti­al election’s man of the match: NEC Chairman Mahinda Deshapriya gestures as he speaks during a press conference on Wednesday. AFP
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka