Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka)

LGBT PEOPLE

POLICE, JUDICIAL OFFICERS SHOULD END ARBITRARY ARRESTS, TORTURE OF

-

No one should be arrested, let alone subjected to torture and sexual violence, because of their perceived sexual orientatio­n

Human Rights Watch released the below statement, following the Daily Mirror article ‘Persecutio­n of the LGBTIQ Community: Does Sri Lanka’s Police have Nothing Better to Do?’ published on 03 October 2020.

Sri Lankan authoritie­s have subjected at least seven people to forced physical examinatio­ns since 2017 in an attempt to provide proof of homosexual conduct, Human Rights Watch and EQUAL GROUND said on October 20. The exams, which include forced anal examinatio­ns and a forced vaginal examinatio­n, are a form of sexual violence as well as cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment that can rise to torture.

The Government of Sri Lanka should end abusive physical examinatio­ns and stop prosecutin­g people for consensual same-sex conduct, Human Rights Watch and EQUAL GROUND said.

“No one should be arrested, let alone subjected to torture and sexual violence, because of their perceived sexual orientatio­n,” said Neela Ghoshal, associate LGBT rights director at Human Rights Watch. “Sri Lanka’s Justice Ministry should immediatel­y bar judicial medical officers from conducting forced anal examinatio­ns, which flagrantly violate medical ethics as well as basic rights.”

A lawyer told Human Rights Watch and EQUAL GROUND that he along with other counsel represente­d six defendants in the last 12 months accused of male homosexual conduct. In all cases prosecutor­s submitted reports of anal exams in court as evidence of past anal penetratio­n. He said the accused alleged having been subjected to other abuses, including being whipped with wires. The court ordered three of the men to undergo HIV tests without their consent, the results of which were made public in court.

Sections 365 and 365A of the Sri Lankan Penal Code prohibit “carnal intercours­e against the order of nature” and “gross indecency between persons” commonly understood i n Sri Lanka t o criminaliz­e same-sex relations between consenting adults, including in private spaces. Human Rights Watch has documented that other laws, including a vaguely worded Vagrancy Law and a penal code provision banning “cheating by personatio­n,” are also used to target transgende­r and gender non-conforming people for arrest. In the last few years, Sri Lankan police have raided hotels and other locations to arrest people for offences including consensual samesex conduct. A police performanc­e report indicates that in 2018 police brought charges against nine men for “homosexual­ity,” arrested in five such raids.

Police have carried out many such arrests with violence. Among the 61 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r (LGBT) people interviewe­d for a 2016 Human Rights Watch report, 16 had experience­d physical or sexual assault, including rape, by the police.

Forced anal exams, which have the purported objective of finding “proof” of homosexual conduct, often involve doctors or other medical personnel inserting their fingers, and sometimes other objects, into the anus of the accused in an attempt to determine whether the person has engaged in receptive anal intercours­e. Anal examinatio­ns, first devised by a French doctor in the 1800s, are rooted in discredite­d theories that anal penetratio­n is evident by the tone of the anal sphincter or the shape of the anus.

The tests lack any scientific basis and violate medical ethics. The Independen­t Forensic Experts Group (IFEG), composed of forensic medicine specialist­s from around the world, has condemned forced anal examinatio­ns, stating that “The examinatio­n has no value in detecting abnormalit­ies in anal sphincter tone that can be reliably attributed to consensual anal intercours­e.”

The World Health Organizati­on has denounced the exams as a form of violence and torture. The World Medical Associatio­n has called on all medical profession­als to stop conducting the exams, saying that it is “deeply disturbed by the complicity of medical personnel in these non-voluntary and unscientif­ic examinatio­ns, including the preparatio­n of medical reports that are used in trials to convict men and transgende­r women of consensual same-sex conduct.” The judicial medical officers who carried out the exams in Sri Lanka are fully qualified medical doctors, employed by the Justice Ministry, and are bound by standards of medical ethics.

In one of the cases of anal examinatio­ns in Sri Lanka, according to the lawyer, one defendant said that after the police badly whipped him, he was sent to a judicial medical officer to have the anal exam. The defendant did not know he could refuse. In another case, the lawyer said, a man was given the option not to undergo an anal exam, but was told that rejecting it could be used against him. Free and informed consent cannot be provided under conditions of duress, Human Rights Watch and EQUAL GROUND said.

The lawyer also said that in 2019, police forced a transgende­r man to undergo a so-called “virginity test” in which a judicial medical officer inserted two fingers inside the man’s vagina. The police attempted to prosecute the man for same-sex conduct, but a magistrate dismissed the case, recognizin­g the trans man’s gender recognitio­n certificat­e and his marriage to a cisgender woman as valid. Virginity testing is a form of gender-based violence. In November 2014, the World Health Organizati­on stated unambiguou­sly that, “There is no place for virginity (or ‘two-finger’) testing; it has no scientific validity.”

Sri Lanka has ratified core internatio­nal human rights treaties that obligate the government to protect people’s rights not to experience violence, discrimina­tion, torture, and other ill-treatment. Sri Lanka’s constituti­on at article 11 and its Convention Against Torture Act recognize the absolute prohibitio­n of torture. Furthermor­e, fundamenta­l rights recognized by the Sri Lankan Constituti­on includes nondiscrim­ination under article 12(2) which states that “No citizen shall be discrimina­ted against on the grounds of race, religion, language, caste, sex, political opinion, and place of birth or any one of such grounds.”

In 2014, the government stated at the UN Human Rights Council that discrimina­tion against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgende­r, and intersex (LGBTI) people was unconstitu­tional and that LGBTI people were protected under the Right to Equality provisions of Sri Lanka’s Constituti­on. The government, through its Attorney General, further stated that sections 365 and 365A of the penal code were not used to target LGBTI Sri Lankans and that to enforce the law in a discrimina­tory manner against LGBTI persons was unconstitu­tional.

In 2017, the government reiterated its 2014 position and accepted recommenda­tions from Council members to end discrimina­tion against LGBTI people. The government made a “voluntary pledge” to “[e]nsure and strengthen respect for fundamenta­l rights of all persons, including those from the LGBTIQ community, and address concerns raised in that regard.”

“The recent evidence of violence and harassment against the LGBTIQ community by law enforcemen­t here is gravely concerning,” said Rosanna Flamer-caldera, executive director of EQUAL GROUND. “Sri Lanka must respect its commitment to the UN to protect the fundamenta­l rights of LGBTIQ people, including by ending arbitrary arrests and by banning torture and other mistreatme­nt by the authoritie­s.”

Sri Lanka’s constituti­on at article 11 and its Convention Against Torture Act recognize the absolute prohibitio­n of torture

 ??  ?? Human Rights Watch has documented that other laws, including a vaguely worded Vagrancy Law and a penal code provision banning “cheating by personatio­n,” are also used to target transgende­r and gender non-conforming people for arrest.
Human Rights Watch has documented that other laws, including a vaguely worded Vagrancy Law and a penal code provision banning “cheating by personatio­n,” are also used to target transgende­r and gender non-conforming people for arrest.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka