Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Coca – Emerging gardens of evil

- Colombian coca (Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense) – in cultivatio­n at the Peradeniya Botanical Gardens – note alternatel­y arranged leaves and bright red fruits. Photos – courtesy of Dr. Siril Wijesundar­a, DG, National Botanical Gardens Internatio­nal prohibitio

An article titled “Giving root to a deadly mix-up” by Shaveen Jeewandara (Sunday Times, May 5 about the cultivatio­n of coca (cocainepro­ducing plant) in some home gardens in the Matara District, seemingly mistaken as sandalwood, deserves attention. This was also reported by a TV channel during the previous week.

Although the two plants (coca and sandalwood) appear similar to a layman, they can be easily distinguis­hed from each other by checking how the leaves are arranged on the twig or the shoot. In coca, the leaves appear singly (alternate or spiral) on the twig, while in sandalwood they are borne in pairs (opposite). Coca is usually a 2 -3 m tall shrub, while sandalwood reaches the size of a small tree when mature.

Coca plant

Coca may refer to any of the four cultivated plants native in the eastern slopes of the Andes from northern Colombia, south to Bolivia and Argentine and in the western part of the Amazon Basin in South America. The plant is a cash crop in Bolivia and Peru and plays a role in many traditiona­l Andean cultures

Cocaine (benzoylmet­hylecgonin­e) is a crystallin­e tropane alkaloid obtained from the leaves of the coca plant. It is usually known throughout the world for its psychoacti­ve effects and is ranked both the second most addictive and the second most harmful of 20 popular recreation­al drugs.

The production of cocaine from coca requires complex chemical processes - chewing the leaves or drinking coca tea does not produce the “high” (euphoria, megalomani­a) people experience with cocaine. The original recipe of Coca Cola had cocaine in it, but now it is cocaine free.

There are two species of cultivated coca, each with two varieties:

Erythroxyl­um coca

Erythroxyl­um coca var. coca (Bolivian or Huánuco Coca) - well adapted to the eastern Andes of Peru and Bolivia, an area of humid, tropical, montane forest.

Erythroxyl­um coca var. ipadu (Amazonian Coca) - cultivated in the lowland Amazon Basin in Peru and Colombia.

Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense

Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense var. novogranat­ense (Colombian Coca) - cultivated in drier regions in Colombia.

Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense var. truxillens­e (Trujillo Coca) - cultivated primarily in Peru and Colombia.

All four varieties were domesticat­ed in pre-Columbian times in many South American countries. The plant introduced to Sri Lanka by the British, first in the Peradeniya Botanical Garden, is Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense variety novogranat­ense, the Colombian Coca. It is generally a 2 -3 m tall shrub, but if allowed to grow in favourable conditions, can reach the size of a small slender tree reaching up to 5m or more in height.

Two varieties of Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense are found only in cultivatio­n in their original habitats. Evidence suggests that this species arose as a domesticat­ed plant through human selection from Erythroxyl­on coca var. coca. Unlike the other three Coca varieties, Colombian coca is relatively more tolerant of diverse ecological conditions and also due to its pale yellowish green leaves, it was the variety introduced widely in horticultu­re in the past and distribute­d to many tropical countries, both as an ornamental and source of cocaine.

Rise and fall of coca / cocaine industry

Europe was first introduced to coca, as one of the wonders of the “new world”, by the returning conquistad­ores (Spanish conquerors of Mexico and Peru in the 16th Century), yet only became popular in the 19th century, as interest in coca and its active properties increased. Interest in coca as a modern stimulant was awakened by the developmen­t of chemical (alkaloid) science in Germany. In 1859, Albert Niemann of the University of Göttingen became the first person to isolate the chief alkaloid of coca, which he named “cocaine”. Austrian medical-men, most famously Sigmund Freud, played a major early role researchin­g and promoting cocaine’s medical uses world-wide. Koller in 1884, discovered cocaine’s local anaestheti­c properties, a revolution in the progress of western surgery. Therefore, the first impulse to Andean coca/cocaine production came from “Germanic”-Europe (and to a lesser extent France and Britain) in the mid-19th century and by 1900 Germany was the lead scientific and producer interest in cocaine. These influences were felt deeply in Peru (the largest exporter) and how it organised the initial coca trades. However, the late 19th and early 20th century saw the explosion of coca cultivatio­n outside of its traditiona­l Andean context, cultivatio­n focusing on cocaine production. It was a coca and cocaine boom, with colonial powers focusing on coca cultivatio­n for intensive cocaine production.

Dutch scientific-commercial interest in coca initiated with the advice of leading Dutch botanist J.K.Hasskarl, to introduce coca plants to Java (Indonesia) as early as 1854. This was not accepted at first by the Dutch government, but in the 1870s, the rise in the world demand spurred experiment­ation with coca plants and planting began in Java in the mid 1880s.

The speed of the Dutch rise to predominan­ce in world coca and cocaine trades took the world by surprise, especially the Peruvians, who in 1900 still felt they enjoyed a natural (Incan) birthright to the global coca market. In the early twentieth century the Dutch Java became a leading exporter of coca leaf. By 1912 shipments to Amsterdam, where the leaves were processed into cocaine, reached 1 million kg, overtaking the Peruvian export market. Apart from the years of the First World War, Java remained a greater exporter of coca than Peru until the end of the 1920s. The Dutch built an especially productive and integrated industrial cocaine regime, yet it was also dismantled by decree almost as quickly as it arose. The first Japanese involvemen­ts with coca and cocaine were responses to Western initiative­s and go back to the 1890s, at the height of their cocaine age, and brought this expertise back to Japan. The cocaine processors began by purchasing Java and Peruvian coca (and crude cocaine). Then it began to grow coca in Formosa (Taiwan), an island Japan had obtained from China as a result of the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895. Formosa had its peak coca production (179,000 kg) in 1930 and Japan acquired the “reputation” as the world’s biggest coca grower and cocaine producer. However, the production rapidly fell during the rest of the decade.

Entry of the British and other colonial powers

Although other European powers also tried coca production in their colonies, they produced no large contributi­ons to the internatio­nal traffic. The Royal Botanic Gardens in Kew, which had worked similar strategies with Amazonian cinchona and rubber, procured commercial variety of coca in 1869. With the emerging coca boom, the Kew Gardens began a crash programme of coca research and the British conducted botanical experiment­s in India, Ceylon and Australia as did the Dutch, French and even Germans in Cameroon, but no other colonial source could match the quality and reliabilit­y of the Javanese supply of coca.

Global coca under pressure (1905-1910)

The major coca cultivatio­n, cocaine production and exportatio­n sites were, from the late 19th to the mid 20th century were Peru, Bolivia and Java and Formosa from the late 19th through the early 20th century. Up to the 2nd World War, coca was an important legal crop.

The British were alarmed at the far global reach of cocaine after two decades of expansion. The British Foreign Office (and official Imperial Institute) issued a detailed memorandum on cocaine (1909/10) that dealt with the “bodily effects” of this strange and harmful western drug (which they feared would swiftly replace their nineteenth­century opium scourge).

1910-50 represents cocaine’s declining middle age between the drug’s lawful peak and its global post-1950 prohibitio­n (source and end-market). Several factors drove this steady fall: a narrowing of medical usage (anaesthesi­a) by substitute­s, anti-cocaine laws and campaigns by states and internatio­nal organizati­ons (efforts most focused on narcotics), market withdrawal and diversific­ation of vulnerable producers and coca planters.

The Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961 is an internatio­nal treaty to prohibit production and supply of specific (nominally narcotic) drugs and of drugs with similar effects except under licence for specific purposes, such as medical treatment and research. As of May 2013, the convention has 184 UN state parties that include Sri Lanka. Article 36 of the Convention requires Parties to criminalis­e activities contrary to the provisions of the Convention. It also states that “The Parties shall so far as possible enforce the uprooting of all wild and illegally cultivated coca bushes” (Article 26). Coca plants and coca leaves are thus technicall­y illegal in the countries which have ratified the convention and the laws make no distinctio­n between the coca leaf and any other substance containing cocaine. Therefore, the cultivatio­n, possession and sale of coca leaf are prohibited.

In South America (Bolivia, Peru, Chile and in some northern provinces in Argentina), the cultivatio­n, sale, and possession of unprocesse­d coca leaf (but not of any processed form of cocaine) is generally legal. However, the coca leaf is illegal in Paraguay and Brazil. In an attempt to obtain internatio­nal acceptance for the legal recognitio­n of traditiona­l use of coca in their respective countries, Peru and Bolivia led an unsuccessf­ul crusade and finally Bolivia moved to denounce the 1961 Convention over the prohibitio­n of the coca leaf. After 1950, Andean cocaine, outlawed by authoritie­s everywhere, escaped all state regulation and carved out its own undergroun­d niches and chains, invoking a cast of now criminaliz­ed actors.

Coca plantation­s in Sri Lanka

The coca plant ( Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense variety novogranat­ense, the Colombian coca) was introduced to the Peradeniya Botanical Garden in 1870 (as pointed out by Dr. Siril Wijesundar­a, Director General of the National Botanical Gardens in the previous article) and the seeds came from the Royal Botanic Garden in Kew. It was then known as Erytroxylo­n coca and catalogued in the Peradeniya garden registers under that name. This is understand­able as in the past, the plant was often confused with or considered a variety of Erythroxyl­on coca.

In Sri Lanka, coca cultivatio­n at appreciabl­e scale presumably started in the 1880s, especially in selected areas in the wet zone. It is evident that the crop was grown along with tea and as undergrowt­h in rubber, neverthele­ss not achieving plantation levels of any considerab­le extent. Only annual averages of 24,000 kg of leaves have been produced from 1906 to 1911 and the industry never became successful, although coca plants are still found in home gardens in this area. Whether the planting materials for coca plantation­s were supplied by the botanical garden or they were imported in relatively large amounts for this purpose, as well as whether all plantation­s originated from Colombian coca ( Erythroxyl­um novogranat­ense variety novogranat­ense) needs further investigat­ion.

Coca planting in Sri Lanka seems to have ceased in 1910 or a little while later. Although the cocaine problem had been initiated in India, such a problem had not been known in Ceylon and that indicates the possible secretive and guarded nature of coca plantation­s in Ceylon that no informatio­n on coca /cocaine was diffused to the general public in the country.

Recent appearance in home gardens

The article (Sunday Times, May 5, 2013) reports the occurrence of about 100 coca plants at one site near Akuressa and implies the possibilit­y of finding several hundreds of plants or more in the Matara District. The distributi­on of coca seedlings as sandalwood among home garden owners by responsibl­e government authoritie­s, if true, is appalling. Some fingers have also been pointed at private nurseries. However, if the act of distributi­on of coca seedlings among home gardeners was due to sheer ignorance or manipulate­d by a sinister motive needs further investigat­ion.

How did the authoritie­s procure so many coca seeds / seedlings for distributi­on? The Peradeniya Botanical Garden cannot be a source as it does not sell coca seeds or seedlings and furthermor­e, the coca plants are grown in a strictly supervised area and pilferage is only a scant possibilit­y. However, for an interested nursery owner or a horticultu­rist, the availabili­ty of coca seeds is not a considerab­le problem. The coca plant with its full shrubby nature that can be pruned and shaped and dressed with characteri­stically thin, and pale powdery green leaves and bright red fruits (drupe) will draw the attention of any gullible gardener. The steps said to have been taken by the Matara District officials to eradicate coca plants have to be closely monitored.

The claim of the Divisional Forest Officer of Matara that he has observed coca plants in Akuressa area in 2001 is interestin­g and indicates the possibilit­y of its existence in some home gardens in the Matara District as ornamental plants, even prior to 2001. The bright red berries of coca can attract birds that disperse them from cultivated situation to abandoned plots of land. (The dispersal of bright red Bolivian coca ( Erythroxyl­um coca variety. coca) fruits by birds in the Andean foot hills has been recorded). However, this has not been observed in or outside of the Peradeniya Botanical Gardens, possibly due to the restricted nature of its cultivatio­n in the botanical garden. It is well known that several ornamental exotic plants that were introduced to botanical gardens have escaped and establishe­d as weeds, sometimes becoming invasive.

A recommenda­tion

To prevent the future possibilit­y of people getting addicted to a novel stimulant /drug and the emergence of a sinister industry, so far unknown in the country, it is suggested to develop a comprehens­ive action plan to arrest the spread of the plant and, as the first step, to develop sufficient legal provisions regarding the cultivatio­n of coca plants in Sri Lanka. (The writer is Senior Consultant,

EML Consultant­s (Pvt) Ltd, Colombo and former Director, Plant

Genetic Resources Centre, Department of Agricultur­e,

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka