Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Immigratio­n win for Republican­s could help Clinton in the end

- Firing up Latino voters

WASHINGTON (REUTERS)Republican­s cheered after the US Supreme Court thwarted President Barack Obama's plan to offer millions of undocument­ed immigrants relief from deportatio­n, but any sense of triumph might last only until the November presidenti­al election.

If recent history is a guide, the stalled cause of immigratio­n reform could energize Hispanic voters in support of likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, hurting Republican Donald Trump's chances of reaching the White House.

Four years ago, Obama, seeking reelection to a second term, made Republican opposition to reform a central theme of his campaign. He ended up swamping his opponent, Mitt Romney, by almost a 3 to 1 margin among Latino voters, who now make up around 12 percent of the US electorate.

Republican hopes for securing a larger share of that vote this election already seemed grim given Trump's vow to deport the estimated 11 million immigrants in the country illegally and to build a wall along the southern US border.

Democrats were quick to assail the ruling and voice concern about the fate of the 4 million or so immigrants who were to be shielded from deportatio­n by Obama's executive action. But it was also clear that they believe the high court has handed them a potent weapon to spur Latinos -- the fastest-growing segment of the US electorate -to vote in greater numbers.

The Latino voting bloc is expected to swell to 27.3 million in 2016, up 4 million from 4 years ago.

The prospect of Clinton filling the current vacancy on the top court with a liberal-leading justice who could, potentiall­y, protect immigratio­n-reform programs, may galvanize those voters as well. Republican­s in Congress have refused to accept Obama's pick for the top court to fill the vacancy left by the death of conservati­ve jus- tice Antonin Scalia in February.

The justices' ruling sent the question of the legality of Obama's program back to a Texas federal court for trial, leaving open the possibilit­y that the matter could return to the high court on appeal at a later date.

The court's decision “just adds fuel to the fire that's already raging,” said Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist. “Each of these events raises the intensity and the Latino turnout even more.” In the wake of the ruling, immigratio­n activists vowed payback in November's election and staged protests on Thursday.

A recent survey by Latino Decisions, a polling firm, showed that about half of the U.S. Hispanic electorate showed greater enthusiasm to vote in 2016 as compared to 2012, with support for Obama's pro-immigrant executive orders running high.

“We should expect similar dynamics this fall, perhaps even more so given the election is likely to determine the ideologica­l direction of the Supreme Court,” said David Damore, an analyst for the firm.

Given Trump's unpopulari­ty with Latino voters, the question for many Democrats both in and outside the Clinton campaign has been less about attracting the bloc's support and more about making sure it votes in large enough numbers to help offset Trump's expected advantage among white voters.

The court's decision may also help make traditiona­lly Republican states with increasing Hispanic population­s such as Arizona more competitiv­e this election, strategist­s in both parties said.

Reed Galen, a Republican strategist in California, said the ruling could boost Democratic hopes in Latino-heavy battlegrou­nd states such as Nevada, Colorado, and Florida.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka