Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Nandikadal – becoming a distractio­n

There 's now opportunit­y for reconcilia­tion and developmen­t in the north

- By Ravi Perumalpil­lai Several opportunit­ies have been missed Investigat­ing the whereabout­s of missing and disappeare­d persons The formulatio­n of a new Constituti­on There is now a political opportunit­y

The ninth year celebratin­g Vesak, now universall­y recognised by the United Nations as a global event, has come and gone. Whether this has been an opportunit­y to reflect on the events of the past fifty years in this little island, is to be seen.

This country has championed the compassion­ate discourses of the Prince Siddhartha. The ancient city of Anuradhapu­ra in the north central region of the island was a cradle of Buddhist civilisati­on and teaching. The splendour of the city with its monastic complexes lies within the walls of the current ‘ ancient city’. Barely, eighty kilometres to the north and east is Nandikadal in the Mullaitivu district.

A gust of wind over the drying sands of the Mullivaika­l beach in the Mullaitivu district of the northeaste­rn region of Sri Lanka heralds the arrival of the dry season. The gusts cause swirls of sand and dust like mini ‘tornadoes’ exposing further the ‘ war- scape’ with the beach still strewn by pieces of clothing both civilian and military, shirts, trousers, sarongs, fatigues etc., appear. Semi buried shoes, boots and rubber slippers lie everywhere.

Each northeast monsoon season incrementa­lly uncovers the horrors of the recent past like peeling an onion. One can only wonder and whimper, speculatin­g about the owners of such residue. The caravans of the print and visual media have long gone. There is only the sound of muffled distant drums beating from Hambantota to Toronto. What is dominant is the eerie and deafening silence of the vacuum of political, social and economic developmen­t. There is little resource input to a depopulate­d area that is not being actively resettled.

In May 2009, a small slither of land all but surrounded by the warm waters of the Indian Ocean located along the northeaste­rn coastline of Sri Lanka became the focus and attention of the whole world. “Nandikadal” became a globally recognised name. It captured yet another episode of man’s inhumanity towards his fellow beings. The execution of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’s military leader, Velupillai Prabhakara­n, along with his family and young son went viral in the age of rolling news and internet access. The soldiers of the Sri Lankan military machine supplied much of the visual footage. To this was added the images of scores of civilians maimed and killed and a Vietnamesq­ue picture of the young and beautiful female announcer of the LTTE TV channel, Isaipriya. She had been raped and killed.

The global Tamil diaspora vociferous- ly clamoured for, and demanded an internatio­nal inquiry. They felt betrayed by Sri Lanka’s neighbour, India, and the so- called free world. While it may be years before the atrocities committed are forensical­ly and legally establishe­d, the prima facie evidence of brutality is there for all to see. The brutalitie­s committed in the two world wars, extending to Palestine, the wars in Indochina and the atrocities committed during the partition of India and Kashmir by our ‘friends’ demonstrat­e the global impervious­ness to horror.

The more recent wars in Bosnia, Burundi, Uganda, Iraq and Syria merely confirmed that any reliance on our ‘ friends’ for moral guidance was misplaced. The Mahinda Rajapaksa regime also found that much of the sentiments expressed in the western hemisphere resonated well with its own rhetoric. The LTTE being described as the ‘most ruthless terrorist organisati­on in the world” (US State Department), “if you are not with us, you are against us” (George W. Bush), “standing shoulder to shoulder” (Tony Blair), “shock and awe” (General Schwarzkop­f): All such utterances in the name of freedom and democracy. There is a growing belief that the Indian navy blockaded the only exit from the Nandikadal to the open ocean, forcing the LTTE leader to take his own life or be killed: Sonia Gandhi’s revenge for the assassinat­ion of her husband in 1991, the then Indian Prime Minister. The Americans provided satellite images while China and Pakistan poured in armaments. This was a truly global effort.

Assassinat­ions and killings have been a tradition in Sri Lanka. In the contempory era stretching from the murder of S. W. R. D. Bandaranai­ke to the death of Prabhakara­n, many have died in atroci- ties committed by all sides, groups and the state. They included: Gamini Dissanayak­e, Lalith Athulathmu­dali, Ranasinghe Premadasa, Lakshman Kadirgamar, Neelan Thiruchelv­am, Kumar Ponnambala­m, Suppiah Paramu

Thamilselv­an, Mahathya, Uma Maheswaran,Lasantha Wickrematu­nge, Joseph Pararajasi­ngham, Thiagaraja­h Maheswaran, Nadarajah Raviraj, Appapillai Amirthalin­gam, Alfred Duraiappah, Arumugam Thiagaraja­h, Rohana Wi j eweera, Bharatha Lakshman Premachand­ra, Vettivelu Yogeswaran, etc., to name but a few in no particular order. Many have been profession­als and intellectu­als and others politician­s. Overt killings evolved into ‘disappeara­nces’ in white vans and death in mysterious accidents and circumstan­ces. This must represent a disproport­ionate number of killings per million of the population. A record, if not a ‘ hub’. For this to stop, it needs vision and brave political leadership. Difficult and seemingly unpopular measures have to be formulated and sold to the people for the greater good.

The storm created by the all round atrocities of the final events fuelled the churning bellies of the Tamil diaspora and equally helped create the spectre of a regrouped LTTE amongst the Sinhala Buddhist south. Nine years later both are seemingly on the wane judging by the attendance at meetings and the diminishin­g rhetoric. Here lies the opportunit­y to make strides in bringing about crucial political and developmen­tal changes and rapidly push the Sri Lankan national agenda forward. Such a “national” agenda by definition will bring about reconcilia­tion between the two major linguistic groups and all communitie­s. Currently ‘ reconcilia­tion’ is only an often reported and repeated platitude. Positive actions alone will create the atmosphere of ‘trust’, which is the other side of the coin.

The recommenda­tions of the government-sponsored LLRC (Lessons Learnt and Reconcilia­tion Commission) headed by the late C. R. de Silva are yet to be implemente­d. The Commonweal­th Heads of Government­s facilitate­d the mechanism for learning lessons and bringing about reconcilia­tion under the chairmansh­ip of Cyril Ramphosa, a doyen of South African politics. This too fell by the way side. Such reports in the main were widely supported and their acceptance may have well avoided relentless and continued global scrutiny.

Along with identifica­tion of assassins and their prosecutio­n is basic human rights and a legal requiremen­t in any civilised society. At an individual level, it brings about closure and more widely allows for reconcilia­tion. This should include the period from 1970 when the southern insurrecti­on erupted.

Should be viewed as an opportunit­y to put into practice global standards of human rights -- equality for all, equal opportunit­ies for all, eliminatio­n of narrow racial, linguistic, religion or colour based discrimina­tion and a celebratio­n of diversity. The restoratio­n of the independen­ce of the judiciary and the clear separation of the legislatur­e and the executive should form the cornerston­e of such a constituti­on. The current constituti­on has twenty versions including the original. This in a period of twenty years and clearly not fit for purpose. Although, always referred to as the J.R. Jayewarden­e constituti­on of 1978, it actually bears little resemblanc­e to the original. There are now twenty versions. Very few constituti­ons in the democratic world can aspire to so many changes in such a short time. Undoubtedl­y, what could be a one-page document would be converted to a tome to be closely scrutinise­d by the erudite Members of Parliament before implementa­tion.

State occupation of privately owned land would be anathema in any society during peacetime. Large tracts of such lands around essential areas for economic developmen­t have negative impact on the livelihood­s of people and serve only to be a thorn in festering flesh. The reversal of such policy and the restoratio­n of civilian economic activity will be a major leap in reconcilia­tion and heal a fractured nation. Economic developmen­t has to be sup- ported by infrastruc­ture that includes funding of projects and transporta­tion. The restoratio­n of Palaly airport and Kankesanth­urai harbour in the north for civilian function is a no brainer in achieving this.

Locally in the northern province as well as in the global diaspora. There is a schism and an evolving ‘opinion change’ that has been brought about by the lack of economic progress in the war devastated regions which mere political rhetoric is failing to achieve. This is becoming more evident in the recent utterances of the global diaspora such as the Global Tamil Forum and even in statements made by the chief minister of the Northern Provincial Council.

Four years after the election of the Tamil National Alliance to govern the provincial council, some of the developmen­tal aspiration­s of the population are yet to be fulfilled. Regular visitors to the north, especially the diaspora who are permanentl­y settled abroad, have noted this. They are questionin­g the lack of solid and sustainabl­e progress. Certainly there are more banks and financing institutio­ns, but this only illustrate­s the continued dependence on a remittance economy that is well entrenched and has a negative social and economic impact. There is a crying need for vocational training institutio­ns and easing of the climate to ‘do business’.

The multi-tiered bureaucrac­y needs to be navigated meticulous­ly, whether it is for agricultur­al developmen­t, health care delivery or setting up of commercial enterprise­s. This can be frustratin­g. Private-sector investors both local and foreign would simply find the going too hard. Indeed, it would not be amiss to ask whether all these layers and non-productive expenditur­e is justifiabl­e. Can we as a country afford for the government to be by far the largest employer?

The bringing about of reconcilia­tion is multi- faceted. The process has little meaning if attempts are made to implement such policies around tables in air-conditione­d offices. One needs to get out and ‘ smell the coffee’. As we move away from the narrative of Nandikadal, sustainabi­lity of long-term peace has to recognise the ground reality. As the old adage goes: “It’s the economy stupid”. Economic developmen­t has to underpin all of the political and judicial measures that protect individual­s and communitie­s. It is for the leadership to formulate policy and articulate the benefits and the developmen­tal needs. In short, lead opinion. In the absence of this, the experience of this country is one of insurrecti­ons in the south and the north.

Who is going to step up to the plate!

 ??  ?? End of the war: The Nandikadal area nine years ago
End of the war: The Nandikadal area nine years ago

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka