Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Authoritie­s have not taken into account that an industry such as theirs cannot be subjected to such a drastic change at such short notice. By our calculatio­ns, it’ll take six months to a year to adjust to the new conditions laid down by the Govt.

- By Sandun Jayawardan­a

Polythene manufactur­ers and recyclers say, while they aren’ t opposed to the ban on certain types of polythene, Govt insistence on enforcing it from September is impractica­l, and will put many in the industry out of business.

Industry representa­tives met with Deputy Minister of Mahaweli Developmen­t and Env i ronment, Anuradha Jayaratne as well as senior officials from the Ministry and the Central Environmen­t Authority (CEA) on Thursday (20), to voice their concerns.

Accordingl­y, the Deputy Minister is due to brief President Maithripal­a Sirisena, who is the Minister o f Mahawe l i Developmen­t and Environmen­t, while further discussion­s are to be held to find common ground.

Key points of contention include the ban’s enforcemen­t date as well as the type of biodegrada­ble polythene that the CEA wants manufactur­ers to start producing.

The Govt announced last week that polythene lunch sheets, grocery bags, shopping bags and food containers made from polystyren­e, will be banned from September 1. This was after Cabinet approved a proposal submitted by the President in his capacity as Environmen­t Minister.

The President’s Cabinet paper was submitted on the implementa­tion of short, medium and long term measures recommende­d by a committee of intellectu­als appointed to study ways to manage the use of polythene, in a way that minimises its impact on the environmen­t. .

“How can you simply shut down an entire industry in 45 days?," questioned PresidentP­olythene Manufactur­ers & Recyclers Associatio­n ( PMRA), Anura Wijethunge.

Mr Wijethunge claimed there were over 1,000 polythene manufactur­ers and recyclers in the country. “About 40,000 people are directly employed by the industry, while some 300,000 others are indirectly employed as sub agents, wholesaler­s and retailers.”

While the PMRA does not oppose a ban on non-biodegrada­ble polythene, Mr Wijethunge said the problem was that no one had bothered to consult manufactur­ers on how long it’ll take to phase out non-biodegrada­ble polythene, and what kind of alternativ­es can be put forward.

Mr Wijethunge was severely critical of the CEA. “We wrote to the CEA thrice, before the ban was announced and once more after the announceme­nt, to brief them from our side, but none of the letters were answered,” he charged. In the end, PMRA representa­tives met Deputy Minister Anuradha Jayaratne, who arranged a meeting with officials.

"Authoritie­s have not taken into account that an industry such as theirs cannot be subjected to such a drastic change at such short notice," the PMRA President charged.

“By our calculatio­ns, it’ll take six months to a year to adjust to the new conditions laid down by the Govt,” he claimed.

"Raw material needed for the manufactur­e of polythene based material must be ordered at least one month in advance from overseas. Manufactur­ers usually order about two months stock of raw material," he explained. "In most cases, it takes a further month for materials to be shipped to the country. As such, many orders have already been placed, while other stocks are currently in shipment. Meanwhile, manufactur­ers, wholesaler­s and retailers keep about three months of finished polythene products in their stocks. There’s no way we can be ready by September. Who’s going to compensate for our losses when the ban goes into force?”

According to Mr Wijethunge, the uncertaint­y surroundin­g the matter had already led manufactur­ers to scale down their production. “Personally, I have scaled down production by 50%. There are others who have completely stopped work for now, as they are concerned about further losses.”

Meanwhile, manufactur­ers and the CEA also disagree on the type of bio- degradable plastic/ polythene that the authority wants manufactur­ers to produce. The manufactur­ers want to produce oxo- biodegrada­ble plastics, which are recyclable, while the CEA is pushing for compostabl­e, hydro-biodegrada­ble plastics.

Working Committee Member on biodegrada­ble plastics at the Sri Lanka Standards Institutio­n ( SLSI) and Director- Evinco Polymers, Thilan Samarawick­rama claimed oxo-biodegrada­ble plastics was the best form of degradable polythene for the country, as the industry could quickly transition to mass manufactur­e, mostly through the use of existing resources. “Some manufactur­ers, who are exporting packaging overseas, already produce oxo-biodegrada­ble plastics. Plus the cost won’t be as severe.”

"In contrast, if the industry were to shift to hydro-biodegrada­ble plastics, as the CEA wants, it would not be able to do so using existing machinery and special machinery would need to be imported. Costs would skyrocket," he cautioned. "The products from such plastics can’t be recycled either," he said.

Meanwhile, some other industries were also voicing concern regarding the timing of the ban. President- Canteen Owners’ Associatio­n, Asela Sampath warned many restaurant­s will be forced to close if the ban on polythene items were to go into effect from September.

Mr Sampath said restaurant owners too were supportive of the ban, but to implement it so quickly, without first introducin­g viable alternativ­es, would create enormous problems for the industry.

The CEA, for its part, is still adamant the ban should go into effect by September 1. However, the CEA will be discussing with industry re presentat ives regarding how best to implement the ban and was open for compromise, Director- CEA’s Waste Management Division, Ajith Weerasunda­ra told the Sunday Times.

Mr Weerasunda­ra pointed out the Govt has so far only announced a decision to ban certain types of polythene products and no laws had been drafted. “We are willing to consult all stakeholde­rs when drafting the new laws,” he said.

"The CEA was also ready to discuss what type of bio-degradable plastic was the best option for Sri Lanka," he assured.

Mr Weerasunda­ra pointed out strict measures were needed to control the impact of polythene on the environmen­t. “People are unnecessar­ily discarding polythene into the environmen­t, and controllin­g that is a must,” he observed.

"While manufactur­e of biodegrada­ble polythene was one aspect, it was also important to promote natural alternativ­es to polythene," he further added. “If you take lunch sheets, we can use banana, lotus and kenda leaves to wrap lunch parcels. We must also encourage people to use lunch boxes. If all office workers in Colombo brought lunch boxes to work for example, we can prevent so much polythene being discarded into the environmen­t,” he opined.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka