Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Economic prospects: Political instabilit­y threat to economic growth in 2018 and beyond

-

Global economic conditions, political stability and effective implementa­tion of pragmatic economic policies would determine the country’s economic performanc­e this year. Of these three, political conditions would be the foremost determinan­t of the country’s economic growth, not only for this year, but for several years ahead.

Economic outlook

Despite the unstable political environmen­t being a serious drawback, the economy is likely to grow somewhat faster than in 2017 by around 5 percent owing to expectatio­n of better weather conditions, increased agricultur­al production, export growth and likely resuscitat­ion of tourism. Food imports would decrease and the trade deficit is likely to contract from about US$9 billion last year to about US$8 billion and thereby improve the current account of the balance of payments. Inflation is likely to abate.

If conditions in the Middle East improve, the economy could benefit by a further increase in tea exports and higher workers’ remittance­s. On the other hand, foreign investment is likely to be dissuaded, if there is political uncertaint­y. The prevailing political conditions are not conducive towards a spurt in economic growth as envisaged in Vision 2025.

Global conditions

Overall global economic conditions are likely to be favourable. The world economy is expected to grow at 4 percent that would be favourable for exports. The US economy is robust with an economic growth of 2.5 percent, full employment and low inflation. Most of the European Union countries will grow steadily. Britain’s economic outlook is not too bright owing to Brexit. This may reduce our exports to the UK. The Indian economy is projected to grow by nearly 7 percent. The Chinese economy is expected to grow by 6.5 percent—faster than in the last few years. Therefore global economic conditions are favourable for internatio­nal trade and exports.

Specific concerns

Neverthele­ss, there are some specific concerns. The inward looking policies and protection­ist policies of the US could hamper exports. The US withdrawal of GSP to all developing countries temporaril­y would have a minimal impact as our largest export garments that does not enjoy this facility expanded significan­tly last year. A few other exports may be affected adversely by raising import prices in the US that would in turn depress demand for them.

Oil prices

Although oil prices are expected to increase, they are not expected to rise above US$60 per barrel, as shale oil production is likely to increase when oil prices rise. An increase in oil price would affect fuel import costs. In the first ten months of last year fuel import costs increased by 39 percent and accounted for nearly a third of the country’s import expenditur­e. An increase in domestic fuel prices would be necessary to contain the 2018 oil bill. This would add to the recent inflationa­ry pressures and also cost of production of many items, especially if electricit­y tariffs are also increased.

Middle East

The continuati­on of the political upheaval in the Middle East would affect our tea exports, as well as workers’ remittance­s. The oil price increase will increase incomes and increase the demand for tea and migrant workers. If the political violence and conflicts in the region cease it would have an important impact on the balance of payments by increasing workers’ remittance­s.

Political instabilit­y

The year begins, as it ended last year, with rumblings of divisivene­ss within the government. The political rhetoric of the last few weeks leading up to the February provincial councils and local government elections appears to threaten the continuati­on of the “unity government”. As last Sunday’s Times editorial pointed out, “2018 is going to be dominated by politics and ‘politricks’. That is almost a certainty.”

Although the breakup of the coalition is unlikely owing to the necessity for both party’s survival, the political configurat­ion and constituti­onal constraint­s, the disunity and divisivene­ss of the two coalition partners is harmful to the economy. At the best of times, the Unity government did not have a consensus on economic policies. This lack of an economic consensus and uncertaint­y in economic policies vitiated the implementa­tion of economic policies, especially the much needed reforms.

One hopes that soon after the February polls there would be greater solidarity in the unity government that would inspire a new wave of confidence. This would be a decisive factor in the country’s economic performanc­e in 2018 to 2020.

Implementa­tion

Inefficien­t administra­tion is one of the most serious obstacles to economic developmen­t. Much of the success of the economy would depend on the effective implementa­tion of policies. This is particular­ly so with respect to much needed reforms.

The political context in 2018 is hardly likely to be conducive to major reforms such as the restructur­ing of loss making enterprise­s. Besides this there is an urgent need to improve the efficiency of public institutio­ns that have a bearing on investment. The factors that affect the slowness of permitting foreign investment that is captured in the Ease of Doing Business Index requires to be improved drasticall­y. The government must adopt mechanisms to ensure effective and speedy implementa­tion of its economic policies. However preoccupat­ion with elections in the first two months of the year and the divisivene­ss of the government are not conducive to enhancing the efficiency of the administra­tion.

Economic outcome

Given these conditions what are the specific likely economic outcomes? The economy is likely to grow at around 5 percent with a positive growth in agricultur­e and industrial and services sectors. Inflation is likely to abate helped by increased food production. While exports are expected to continue its recent growth momentum, the trade balance will be in deficit, as has been the case in most years. However the trade deficit is likely to be somewhat less than in 2017 at around US$8 billion.

It is still not clear whether workers’ remittance­s would continue to dip and whether tourism would regain its growth witnessed in recent years. What is clear is that the performanc­es in these would determine the balance of payments outcome. It is vital that the country has a higher balance of payments surplus to strengthen the foreign exchange reserves to enable the impending large debt repayments in 2019. Concluding reflection­s All things considered, this year’s economic performanc­e would depend heavily on political stability, solidarity of the government and its capacity to pursue economic policies without political opportunis­m. Lack of consensus on economic policies in the government, political considerat­ions and unscientif­ic decision making dominating policy formulatio­n and constant opposition and obstructio­n to economic policy implementa­tion could be formidable drawbacks to the economy’s progress in 2018. Economic outcomes in 2018 to 2020 would be heavily dependent on political stability and the pursuance of consistent and pragmatic economic policies. manipulati­on of media and reliance on covert channels of communicat­ion often reduces soft power. Democracie­s should avoid the temptation to imitate these authoritar­ian sharp-power tools.

Moreover, shutting down legitimate Chinese soft-power tools can be counter-productive. Soft power is often used for competitiv­e, zero-sum purposes; but it can also have positive sum aspects.

For example, if both China and the US wish to avoid conflict, exchange programs that increase American attraction to China, and vice versa, would benefit both countries. And on transnatio­nal issues such as climate change, where both countries can benefit from cooperatio­n, soft power can help build the trust and create the networks that make such cooperatio­n possible.

While it would be a mistake to prohibit Chinese soft-power efforts just because they sometimes shade into sharp power, it is also important to monitor the dividing line carefully. For example, the Hanban, the government agency that manages the 500 Confucius Institutes and 1,000 Confucius classrooms that China supports in universiti­es and schools around the world to teach Chinese language and culture, must resist the temptation to set restrictio­ns that limit academic freedom. Crossing that line has led to the disbanding of some Confucius Institutes.

As such cases show, the best defence against China’s use of soft-power programs as sharp-power tools is open exposure of such efforts. And this is where democracie­s have an advantage.

(The writer is a professor at Harvard and author of The Future of Power. )

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2018. www.project-syndicate.org

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka