Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Palestine to lead UN’s largest group of developing nations

- By Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, (IPS) - The Group of 77 (G77) — the largest single coalition of developing countries at the United Nations– is to be chaired by Palestine, come January.

“It’s a historical first, both for Palestine and the G77,” an Asian diplomat told IPS, pointing out that Palestine will be politicall­y empowered to collective­ly represent 134 UN member states, including China.

Created in June 1964, the 54- year- old Group comprises over 80 per cent of the world’s population and approximat­ely twothirds of the United Nations membership. Traditiona­lly, the G77 speaks with a single voice before the 193- member General Assembly, the highest policy making body at the UN, and also at all UN committee meetings and at internatio­nal conference­s.

Under a system of geographic­al rotation, it was Asia’s turn to name a chairman for 2019. The Asian Group has unanimousl­y endorsed Palestine, which will be formally elected chair at the annual G77 ministeria­l meeting, scheduled to take place in mid-September.

Palestine will take over from the current chair, Egypt, which is representi­ng the African Group of countries.

The chairmansh­ip is a tremendous political boost for Palestine at a time when it is being increasing­ly blackliste­d by the Trump administra­tion which is kowtowing to the Israelis.

Although it is not a full-fledged UN member state, Palestine is recognised by 136 UN members, and since 2012, has the status of a “non- member observer state” – as does the Holy See (the Vatican).

Nadia Hijab, President, Al- Shabaka Board of Directors, told IPS: “At a time when Israel is moving on all fronts to wipe Palestine definitive­ly off the map through relentless colonisati­on – and to muscle in on UN committees despite its flagrant violations of internatio­nal law — it is a source of solace to see Palestine slated for a very visible role at the UN.” However, comforting as this may be, she pointed out, it will take a lot more than this to make “Palestine” a reality on the ground.

Sadly, the Ramallah- based Palestinia­n leadership has been unwilling or unable to end security coordinati­on with Israel and to heal internal divisions. Instead, she said, it is cracking down on peaceful Palestinia­n protests.

“It is also reshaping the Palestine Liberation Organisati­on, which has always been recognised as the sole legitimate representa­tive of the Palestinia­n people, in a way that excludes alternativ­e and opposing views,” Hijab declared.

Martin Khor, Advisor to the Malaysiaba­sed Third World Network, told IPS: “I think it will be a historic and a significan­t developmen­t -- first for the G77 countries to elect Palestine as its chair, and thereby affirm their confidence in its leadership.” The election will also prove that the State of Palestine itself has decided it can mobilise its human and material resources to take on the complex task of coordinati­ng the largest grouping in the UN system – even though it has to fight its own very challengin­g battles of survival and independen­ce, said Khor, the former executive director of the Geneva-based South Centre.

“Both Palestine and the G77 deserve the support of people around the world to wish them success in voicing and defending the interests of developing countries in these very difficult times when internatio­nal cooperatio­n and multilater­alism are coming under attack,” he said.

Last week, the Trump administra­tion refused to grant visas to a six- member Palestinia­n delegation that was expected to participat­e at the UN’s High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainabl­e Developmen­t which took place on July 16-18.

This was clearly in violation of the 1947 US-UN Headquarte­rs Agreement which calls on the US, among other obligation­s, to facilitate delegates participat­ing at UN meetings.

Asked about the visa refusal, UN deputy spokespers­on Farhan Haq told reporters last week: “Well, certainly, we’re aware of this latest incident, but as far as I’m aware, there is a Host Country Committee that deals with disputes involving access to the United Nations and any problems dealing with the host country on that.”

“As of now, the Host Country Committee has not been approached or formally informed of this, so they haven’t acted on this. But it’s normally their role to deal with this situation. Of course, we would hope that all of those who are here to attend UN meetings would have the ability to do so,” he added.

Samir Sanbar, a former UN Assistant Secretary- General who headed the Department of Public Informatio­n (DPI), told IPS chairing the G- 77 will be an unpreceden­ted role for Palestine.

He said leading that large, varied yet collaborat­ive group will require tactful handling by all sides at a time when the rightful Palestinia­n cause needs every support as the region—and a fragmented conflicted, almost leaderless world— is facing serious challenges.

“It is hoped that Ambassador Riyad Mansour, Permanent Observer of the State of Palestine and an experience­d diplomat with proven UN record, will be given the opportunit­y and required leeway to oper- ate in an inclusive, patient and fruitful manner to enhance the role of the G 77 while advancing the status of Palestine, said Sanbar, who served under five different UN secretarie­s-general.

At the UN, the Trump administra­tion has been increasing­ly underminin­g the Palestinia­n cause – a cause long supported by an overwhelmi­ng majority of member states in the world body.

In May, the US relocated its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem even though the UN has deemed it “occupied” declaring that the status of East Jerusalem should be subject to negotiatio­ns and that East Jerusalem will be the future capital of the State of Palestine.

Last month, the Trump administra­tion also reduced its funding—from an estimated $360 million in 2017 to $60 million this year — to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), created in 1949 to provide assistance to over 5.5 million refugees resulting from the creation of Israel in 1948

Last year when Secretary- General Antonio Guterres proposed the appointmen­t of former Palestinia­n Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad as UN’s Special Representa­tive in Libya, the proposal was shot down by US Ambassador Nikki Haley, purely because he was a Palestinia­n.

And speaking before the US House Appropriat­ions State and Foreign Operations Subcommitt­ee, Haley went even further down the road when she indicated she would block any appointmen­t of a Palestinia­n official to a senior role at the UN because Washington “does not recognise Palestine” as an independen­t state.

Suddenly, the Palestinia­ns, for the first time, seem blackliste­d– and declared political outcasts– in a world body where some of them held key posts in a bygone era.

Guterres, who apparently submitted to US pressure by stepping back on Fayyad’s appointmen­t plucked up courage to tell reporters: “I think it was a serious mistake. I think that Mr. Fayyad was the right person in the right place at the right time, and I think that those who will lose will be the Libyan people and the Libyan peace process.”

And, he rightly added: “”I believe that it is essential for everybody to understand that people serving the UN are serving in their personal capacities. They don’t represent a country or a government – they are citizens of the world representi­ng the UN Charter and abiding by the UN Charter,” he said, pointedly directing his answer at Haley.

A former chair of the G77 chapter in Vienna told IPS although the Palestinia­n issue is fundamenta­lly a political one, centred as well on the legitimacy and legality of Israeli occupation, it no longer remains in the political-legal realms exclusivel­y.

He said there are a large number of issues of economic, social and cultural and environmen­tal nature, including health, education, food, water, etc, which arise both directly from conditions of occupation, as well as laterally from other conditions such as denial of humanitari­an access, and, very recently, the declaratio­n of “Israel as a Jewish state”.

It is logical that advancing a struggle on these issues calls for a broad forum of solidarity, and the G 77 fits the bill, he noted

In an op-ed piece marking the 50th anniversar­y of the G77, Mourad Ahmia, the G77 Executive Secretary said: “When it was establishe­d on Jun. 15, 1964, the signing nations of the well- known “Joint Declaratio­n of Seventy-Seven Countries” formed the largest intergover­nmental organisati­on of developing countries in the United Nations to articulate and promote their collective interests and common developmen­t agenda.

Since the First Ministeria­l meeting of the G-77 in Algeria in October 1967, and the adoption of the “Charter of Algiers”, the Group of 77 laid down the institutio­nal mechanisms and structures that have contribute­d to shaping the internatio­nal developmen­t agenda and changing the landscape of the global South for the past five decades, he pointed out.

“Over the years, the Group has gained an increasing role in the determinat­ion and conduct of internatio­nal relations through global negotiatio­ns on major North-South and developmen­t issues.” The Group has a presence worldwide at UN centres in New York, Geneva, Nairobi, Paris, Rome, Vienna, and Washington D. C., and is actively involved in ongoing negotiatio­ns on a wide range of global issues including climate change, poverty eradicatio­n, migration, trade, and the law of the sea.

“Today, the G-77 remains the only viable and operationa­l mechanism in multilater­al economic diplomacy within the UN system. The growing membership is proof of its enduring strength,” he declared.

 ??  ?? Palestine's flag at UN headquarte­rs: Picture credit: Institute for Palestine Studies
Palestine's flag at UN headquarte­rs: Picture credit: Institute for Palestine Studies

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka