Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

It was tea, not rice!

-

After learning about the economic developmen­t history of Sri Lanka, there was a question that made me anxious for many years at that time: Why did British planters during colonial times take so much of trouble and risk in introducin­g some plantation crops that were totally alien to Sri Lanka? The flip side of my question was that “instead of tea or rubber, why did they never think of investing in rice production?” Perhaps, we might be able to figure out some political answers, but my question was an economic one.

A rational question

I also had many reasons to make my question a rational one. Rice was our staple food, but at that time Sri Lanka was short of rice; the country could produce only half the people’s rice requiremen­t. The other half was imported, and the colonial government spent foreign exchange to import rice. This means that there was an absolute need for investment in rice production. That was exactly why the national government­s did so after independen­ce.

There was an ancient “high-tech” irrigation system in the country’s dry zone, which was abandoned into jungles as people gradually moved towards the south. A rehabilita­tion of that irrigation system would have supplied the necessary inputs, the capital, and the infrastruc­ture needed for reviving the country’s ancient rice cultivatio­n.

Rice ration scheme

During the time of the Second World War, as import trade was disrupted there was not enough rice in the country. The colonial government took steps to introduce a “rice ration” scheme. Then the World War ended but the rice ration scheme continued for the next 30 years. Under this scheme, rice was imported and distribute­d among all Sri Lankans - both rich and poor! During the 30-year period of time some politician­s lost power on the rice ration scheme while others came to power using this scheme as an election tool.

Sri Lanka also entered into a historical “rice-rubber pact” with China in 1952 to exchange rice for rubber; China received rubber from Sri Lanka which was used as a raw material for industries in China. In return, Sri Lanka received rice from China, which was distribute­d among all Sri Lankans; we cooked and ate it.

Rice was such an important staple food in Sri Lanka which could even topple politician­s showing that the country was in need of investing in local rice production. Yet rice production was not an attractive area for agricultur­e investment for planters who were seeking plantation opportunit­ies in Sri Lanka.

Plantation­s of alien plants

Tea and rubber were both unknown to the Sri Lankans. The British planters brought tea from China and rubber from Latin America to Asian countries like Sri Lanka; the crops were planted as an experiment in the late 19th Century. Before that they had already experiment­ed with some other crops, while one of the thriving plantation crops was coffee. It was also a foreign crop introduced to Sri Lanka from Latin America. Coffee plantation­s flourished by the 1870s and then died due to a disease.

There was no reason to argue that British did not want to invest in any indigenous crop. They had already identified some indigenous crops too, including coconut and some spices. They invested in these crops, but did not show any interest in rice!

Even though the planters were not “politicall­y correct” because they were not seeking election victories, they knew the economics of their investment decisions. From a political point of view, their investment decisions were “correct” in the long term, as the Sri Lankan economy flourished for over more than 100 years on the fortune of tea, rubber and coconut.

Internatio­nal market

The prime concern of British investment in plantation crops was the market; the market has to be a “big market” for an industry to grow and thrive. It would never be the local market of Sri Lanka, which is too small to allow an industry to thrive and grow. Even if the countries like China or India with over 1 billion people consider their local markets “too small” for their industries to grow, how can we talk about the capacity of our local market with just 21 million people?

The planters knew that rice would have never been a commercial­ly viable crop as such; in fact, Sri Lanka achieved self-sufficienc­y in rice production by the 1980s, all due to government support. Even today, rice production in Sri Lanka is sustained by import protection and government support.

This is because, although it is our staple food crop, it does not have the economic competency to grow or, at least to survive in an internatio­nal market. It is not an export crop exposed to internatio­nal market environmen­t and, it would not grow to be an export commodity either. Rice in Sri Lanka has to remain as a “domestic crop” as we have named it, until and unless conditions change in the future.

Why exports?

Why do we need to bother about exporting our products to the internatio­nal market, instead of being content with our local market, just like in the case of rice?

There can be many ways to answer this question. One way is to look at the benefits of the internatio­nal market to the investor as well as to the nation. To an investor, the internatio­nal market offers “unlimited opportunit­ies” to expand the industry. If it was the local market like in the case of rice, either tea or rubber or any other industry would not have grown that far; the boundaries of the market will limit the expansion of any economic activity.

Moreover, there is also an economic benefit of a bigger market known as “economies of scale and scope”; an investor can produce at lower cost (economies of scale) and diversify into similar products (economies of scope), when the market is big enough to permit such changes. This is important to remain competitiv­e in a market where there are many rivals. However, that competitio­n is good because it makes the product developmen­t a constant process.

Prosperity from plantation crops

When you add up all these changes at individual levels, then we have the national picture. At national level, all these changes will accelerate growth and prosperity and, provide sustainabl­e remedies to many economic problems such as trade deficits, budget deficits and debt burden.

The plantation crops brought Sri Lanka to a prosperous position at the time. They brought about enough foreign exchange to the country so that for many years the country had trade surpluses; in fact, the country was able to import the rice it needed.

Plantation crops generated tax revenue to the government so that the government­s could maintain sound budgets. The country’s welfare system including rice ration scheme was maintained with government spending.

The developmen­t of the country’s service sector such as banking, transporta­tion, port services and trade were based on and connected to the progress of the plantation crops at the time.

But the problem was that the country started depending too much and too long on the fortune of the plantation crops. Even by the 1970s, the Sri Lankan economy was surviving on the fortune of plantation crops.

Concluding remark

I have a point to consider, although some of us are reluctant to agree with me. Domestic crops including rice will meet our food requiremen­t so that they will make us “survive”. These economic activities cannot take the country beyond the boundaries of survival.

What would allow the economy to thrive is producing for the internatio­nal market. Export growth is important for all the countries to prosper and, more important for small countries than big ones.

(The writer is a Professor in Economics at the Colombo

University. He can be reached at sirimal@econ.cmb.ac.lk)

 ??  ?? File picture of different varieties of Ceylon Tea
File picture of different varieties of Ceylon Tea
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka