Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

MT New Diamond fire: Singapore-based salvor settled AG's claims

-

Contrary to some reports, it was the Singapore-based salvor, and not the owners of MT New Diamond that settled the payment requested by the Attorney General over expenses incurred when fighting the fire that swept through the vessel.

The salvor, SMIT Singapore Pte Ltd, was appointed by the ship’s Greek owners M/s. Porto Emporios Shipping Inc. on September 6; three days after a boiler room explosion onboard the vessel started a fire onboard.

The salvor retained the services of local law firm M/s Julius & Creasy through their lawyers in London to make representa­tion for and on behalf of them as their legal counsel in the country. The team from Julius & Creasy consisted of Senior Partner S.A. Cader, Upeksha Weerasingh­e, Sumudu Dissanayak­e and Farha Huzair.

During their meetings with the AG, the firm had pointed out that it was acting in the national interest and working to convince their clients to agree to an immediate transfer of funds and a full and final settlement, rather than resolve the claims at Arbitratio­n in London, as is the usual internatio­nal practice.

The owners of the vessels and the salvor divided between themselves the responsibi­lities related to the ship, the Sunday Times learns. Accordingl­y, it fell on the salvor to take care of the claims submitted by state agencies in fighting the fire while the owners were required to take care of any claims made by the Marine Environmen­t Protection Authority (MEPA) for environmen­tal damage caused by any oil spill.

An authoritat­ive source stressed that the owners had appointed the salvor under the Lloyd’s Standard Form of Salvage Agreement, universall­y known as the ‘Lloyds Open Forum.’ The salvage contract was under the “No Cure - No Pay” policy enshrined in the 1989 Internatio­nal Convention Salvage. According to the policy, salvors respond to incidents at their own risk in the expectatio­n of fair reward if they are successful. “The Government did not do anything wrong, but under the agreement, it is the owners who appoint the salvors and that is how SMIT Singapore Pte Ltd was appointed as the salvor in this case. The Government could not have carried out the salvage operation without entering into a salvage agreement with the owners. Therefore, the notion that the state lost revenue (in relation to salvage) is without any basis,” the source added.

The salvor agreed to settle costs incurred by state agencies including the Sri Lanka Navy, Sri Lanka Air Force, Colombo Dockyard and the Sri Lanka Ports Authority. This was conveyed to the Attorney General by lawyers representi­ng the salvor. After discussion­s, an agreement was reached to pay the total claim requested by the AG and accordingl­y, on October 1, USD 2, 130, 967.03 (Approximat­ely Rs 390 million) was transferre­d to an account nominated by the Attorney General and maintained by the Treasury.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka