Sunday Times (Sri Lanka)

Shocking drug forgery: Indian firm denies it exported allergy-causing immunoglob­ulin vials

Health Ministry makes Rs. 40 million part payment to a supplier, without verifying from where or how the injections came to Sri Lanka Medical community expresses serious concern over life-threatenin­g corruption in the health sector

-

The Health Ministry has paid Rs. 40 million for and distribute­d to hospitals a part-consignmen­t of sensitive human immunoglob­ulin injections without verifying from where or how they came to Sri Lanka.

It was only when adverse reactions were recorded in Colombo, Kandy and Matale that doctors raised concerns about the human immunoglob­ulin 5-6g vials that had been distribute­d to government hospitals for intravenou­s use between July and September this year by the Medical Supplies Division (MSD).

The Sunday Times broke the story on October 1, 2023. A day later, Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwell­a said three separate complaints were lodged with the Criminal Investigat­ion Department (CID), alleging that this immunoglob­ulin had been procured and cleared on the basis of a forged waiver of registrati­on purporting to be from the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) CEO. This is yet to be proven through an inquiry, either internal or external.

Had the allergies not drawn attention to this questionab­le tender, the full shipment of 22,500 vials is likely to have been bought at a cost of over Rs. 942 million.

Where did it come from?

Senior officials still do not know from where these immunoglob­ulin vials originated or who produced their contents. One even claimed (on condition of anonymity) that they could have been smuggled in on personal luggage, thereby compromisi­ng the cold chain and causing adverse reactions in patients. Or, he maintained, the local supplier—named the Seeduwa-based Isloez Biotech PharmaAG Ltd.—might have manufactur­ed or compounded the drug here.

Health Ministry, MSD and NMRA documents state that the immunoglob­ulin was manufactur­ed by an Indian company based in Gujarat. This is now establishe­d to be false.

On official documents in Sri Lanka, the Indian entity’s name is spelt in different ways, including 'Livealth Bio Pharmaceut­icals Pvt Ltd’ and ‘Livealth Biopharmas (Pvt) Ltd’. The problemati­c immunoglob­ulin vials were in boxes that said ‘Livealth Bio pharma [sic] (PVT) Ltd’.

The Sunday Times contacted the company. A representa­tive categorica­lly denied any connection with this order, saying Livealth Biopharma Pvt Ltd has not produced and is not even licensed to manufactur­e human immunoglob­ulin.

Categorica­l denial

“Please note that these products are neither manufactur­ed nor supplied from our end,” he reiterated. “The best part is we have never manufactur­ed, supplied or exported these products to any party to date.” Human immunoglob­ulin is not even on the list of its advertised items. And the drug is made by just three to four companies in India, he said.

On October 3, two days after our report, the MSD issued a circular ordering the human immunoglob­ulin IV 5-6g vials to be immediatel­y withheld from use based on the recommenda­tion of the NMRA’s Safety and Risk Evaluation Subcommitt­ee. SAFRESC had given the guidance on September 20, two weeks prior. Samples were instructed to be made available to the NMRA quality assurance lab for tests. It is not immediatel­y known whether this has been done.

It was on the same date, October 3, that Livealth in India first learned about its reported associatio­n with immunoglob­ulin through an email from the NMRA’s regulatory pharmacist. On receipt of this communicat­ion, the company did a limited search and acquired three product images circulatin­g in the pharmaceut­ical community in relation to “a consignmen­t fraudulent­ly forwarded to Sri Lanka under our name”.

It wrote back to the NMRA that all informatio­n on the product boxes, including company name, address, and email, was incorrect. “We believe this has been done intentiona­lly to avoid being identified in case of such happenings,” the representa­tive said. The packaging mentions an address in Gujarat with a Mumbai telephone number. It contains no licence number or any other details mandatory for the export of drugs.

“We wonder what paperwork was submitted to legitimise export,” he said, adding that Indian Customs and Drug Regulatory Authority are “extremely vigilant and strict about minute details”. “The question in our minds is, was this even exported from India? Looking at this packaging, this consignmen­t could not have been passed or allowed for export.”

The packaging also mentions another company named “Curimed Lifescienc­e” with a Gujarat address. The Livealth spokesman said he couldn’t vouch for this entity with which Livealth had no associatio­n. But he pointed out that the telephone number on the packaging attributed to Curimed had 11 digits instead of the usual ten.

No response from NMRA

Livealth has asked NMRA to identify “the source of such fraudulent and unwarrante­d activities under our label”. For its own investigat­ion, it has requested the full names of the Indian exporter and Sri Lankan importer, the Indian port of dispatch, and the Sri Lankan port of arrival.

“With the above informatio­n, once received from your end, we would like to officially file a complaint with the Indian Central FDA [Food and Drug Administra­tion], State FDA, Zonal FDA and Indian Customs to ensure such intentiona­l fraudulent companies are identified and brought to justice to save genuine exporters' image and more importantl­y precious human lives,” Livealth notified NMRA.

NMRA had not responded to the Indian company at the time of going to press. But the regulator issued a statement this week regarding what it said was the import and distributi­on of human immunoglob­ulin by Isolez, the quality failure of the drug, and the submission of forged documents to gain Customs clearance for the consignmen­t.

After adverse reactions were reported from the Matale District Hospital and the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, the NMRA inquired into whether the drug was brought on a waiver of registrati­on (WoR) that it had issued, the statement said. But there was no record whatsoever in the NMRA of this medicine consignmen­t or any evidence of approval being granted. The product was neither registered nor exempted from registrati­on. The relevant documents, including the official seal of the NMRA CEO, were forgeries.

Isolez Chairman Hewage Sudath Janaka Fernando admitted that they received a part payment for the vials they had supplied so far. (The Health Minister told parliament that 3,085 of the requisitio­ned 22,500 vials were received.) Mr.Fernando protested that the product was withdrawn without a quality lab test. And that the NMRA’s SAFRESC had not been appointed in terms of the law. He also contested the authentici­ty of the adverse reaction reports filed by the Kandy and Matale hospitals. Mr.Fernando requested the Sunday

Times not to publish other responses he provided to our questions—such as who supplied the immunoglob­ulin or whether Isolez had an agreement with Livealth—saying he had answered on the basis of confidenti­ality.

Isolez is not a member of the Sri Lanka Chamber of Pharmaceut­ical Industry.

Dangerous situation

The risks related to the low standard of human immunoglob­ulin are considerab­le, medical specialist­s unanimousl­y agreed. The product directly affects human lives—it could spread blood-borne diseases such as HIV and hepatitis B or C—and is globally manufactur­ed under stringent, specific conditions that are highly regulated. It has to be under refrigerat­ion and is usually stored in separately-managed facilities.

In Sri Lanka’s case, there is zero informatio­n from the NMRA or Health Ministry about the stocks that were distribute­d among patients or what was even administer­ed to them. Medical experts pointed out that the situation was dangerous because immunoglob­ulin is extracted from large quantities of human blood from many contributo­rs.

Although the NMRA and the Health Ministry absolve themselves of guilt by stating the stocks were brought on forged documents, the MSD made the payment and released the drugs to hospitals. Health Secretary Janaka Chandragup­tha confirmed he was the head of the relevant tender board. His signature is on a letter accepting expression­s of interest from Isolez under the Indian credit line. This document was not claimed to be forged.

Yesterday, Mr. Chandragup­tha confirmed his role on the tender board and said Cabinet approval hadn’t been necessary for the immunoglob­ulin purchase. He said to call him back for further details and thereafter did not answer the phone. The purchase passed many gatekeeper­s, but the “forgery” story surfaced only after allergies were reported.

It is now critical to check whether the NMRA CEO’s alleged “forged seals” were used to buy other medication­s, medical profession­als urged. All regulatory processes have broken down, as evidenced by this case. The issuance of indiscrimi­nate WoRs by the NMRA on the Health Ministry’s instructio­ns has opened the floodgates.

“When the regulatory system is weakened or abused, when the regulator is asleep, this is what happens,” a senior doctor concluded.

Livealth has asked NMRA to identify “the source of such fraudulent and unwarrante­d activities under our label”. For its own investigat­ion, it has requested the full names of the Indian exporter and Sri Lankan importer, the Indian port of dispatch, and the Sri Lankan port of arrival

 ?? ?? The packaging mentions an address in Gujarat with a Mumbai telephone number. It contains no licence number or any other details mandatory for the export of drugs
The packaging mentions an address in Gujarat with a Mumbai telephone number. It contains no licence number or any other details mandatory for the export of drugs
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Sri Lanka