Russia’s next president: If not Putin, then who?
Russia’s elections are scheduled to take place from March 15–17. For decades, Russia's presidential elections have been closely watched and scrutinised by countries around the world because Russia is the largest country in the world and the richest in natural resources. It is despised by the West and loved by the rest of the world.
Russia’s current President, Vladimir Putin, is a candidate for the presidency. He easily won the elections in 2000, 2004, and 2012, and in 2018, he won the election garnering 77% of the vote.
Many aspiring candidates
Among the candidates seeking the presidency are experienced politicians. On the campaign trail, they talk about various issues, including their love for Russia and protecting it from the West’s devious attempts to dismantle it; promises to end the war in Ukraine; and offers of various perks and promises.
Some candidates talk about eradicating corruption, lack of economic growth, low living standards, high cost of living, and improving relations with the West.
These are persuasive slogans to many, but not to the elderly Russians who lived in the Soviet era that ended with the humiliating disintegration of the Soviet Union.
I know of many prominent and proven politicians who are winnable candidates, but they refrain from contesting as they prefer Putin as a viable candidate.
As elsewhere, Russians evaluate the candidates based on their qualities, qualifications, past service to the nation, and most importantly, their ability and desire to protect the unity and sovereignty of Russia.
Currently, Putin is indisputably the leading candidate for multiple reasons. Whether he can win another term depends on many issues, past and present.
Russia’s trials and tribulations
Russia has been in the news since its Socialist Revolution in 1917, for winning the second world war, for freeing the Eastern European countries from the Nazis, and for marching to Berlin to end the brutal war.
It is a documented fact by the Military Tribunal in Nuremberg that the former Soviet Union lost more than 27 million people—8.7 million military personnel and 19 million civilians—and that the largest number of civilian deaths in a single city occurred during the Siege of Leningrad, where 1.2 million Russians died.
But the country was rebuilt from the total devastation of the Second World War and further developed to the amazement of the whole world.
When I visited Moscow in 1962, the Soviet Union was a proud nation with a thriving economy, marvels of industrialisation, advances in science, technology, and medicine, escapades into outer space (ahead of the United States), and basking in the glory of a superpower.
During the Cold War era, the Americans and Soviets partnered in many mutually beneficial scientific and educational projects and cooperated in many bilateral arms reduction treaties to reduce their stockpile of nearly 70,300 nuclear warheads to a total of 13,865—still ample to scorch our earth—when compared to the two American atomic bombs that scorched Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing 140,000 and 74,000 people, respectively.
Those were the good old pragmatic days when we had sagacious leaders engaging in the concepts of ‘détente’ and ‘peaceful coexistence’ and who worked for the peace and prosperity of all mankind.
The dreaded, unforgettable and unforgiving past
The tragic downfall of the former Soviet Union began in the 1980s as its social, political, and economic problems began to accumulate.
During my routine biennial visits to Moscow in the 1990s, it was heartbreaking to see the downfall: bribery, corruption, and criminality had permeated the entire state apparatus and businesses.
Food rationing, unpaid salaries and pensions, rampant crime, and gang rivalry were the norm. Russian politics, economy, military, and society were in disarray, and by 1998, the government was officially bankrupt, having devalued the ruble and defaulted on its debts, and more than 42 million Russians lived below the poverty line.
I vividly recall the era of Presidents Gorbachev and Yeltsin— with Ronald Reagan’s humiliating commands to “tear down that Berlin Wall” and “dismantle the evil empire”.
Also, a mistake of that era was for Gorbachev to blindly accept America’s request to vacate the Soviet presence in Eastern European countries, saying that “we [NATO] will not move an inch into those former Eastern European countries towards Russia”.
Thus began NATO’s aggressive and intrusive military expansion towards Russia, and it continues, violating Russia’s security interests. Putin reiterates this as a major factor in the current war in Ukraine.
When Yeltsin came to power in 1991, the US held high hopes of getting inside Russia and provided tens of billions of dollars in economic assistance from the IMF, World Bank, etc.
The US sent political and economic advisers to work with Yeltsin’s officials in the nascent private sector to promote democracy and install a market economy. That miserably failed, ending in absolute chaos, enriching a few and impoverishing many—a colossal financial loss, embarrassment, and disappointment for the US.
For Russians, the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 was the most humiliating and unforgettable moment in Russian history.
I reminisce about this recent past, as the distressed elderly Russians (today’s majority of voters) are constantly fearful of the fate of their beloved Russia.
Putin resuscitates Russia Vladimir Putin came to power in 2000, inheriting a run-down military and a literally bankrupt Russia in a deep recession and absolute disarray. It was so chaotic that Gorbachev admitted that Putin inherited “political chaos, military chaos, chaos everywhere”. A disgraced Russia was in shambles.
Putin quickly developed the economy with new industries and investments, revamped its military, decreased poverty by boosting agricultural production and construction, increased workers’ salaries, and granted higher pensions to pensioners who had silently suffered for decades.
For over twenty years, Putin has preserved the unity of Russia, advanced its military supremacy, zealously guarded Russia’s sovereignty, and restored its status as a global power.
I have known young and old Russians quite well for over 60 years. They are proud of their centuries-old history and heritage, having patriotically defeated Napoleon and Hitler, and proud of their status as a world power. They are content with the current free-market economy and the perks that come with it.
Russia-West animosity
Young voters question why Putin cannot collaborate with the West.
Putin has answered that question many times. He has reiterated, “America loves subservient leaders who obey their orders; the US prefers diktat rather than dialogue; America does not need allies, it needs vassals." Therein lies the problem.
As I know well, Putin abhors orders, especially if the West’s demands are contrary to the best interests of Russia. When Western leaders realised that Putin could not be manipulated, they began to demonise him. Thus began the “Putin-mania” and “Russophobia”.
I have known young and old Russians quite well for over 60 years. They are proud of their centuries-old history and heritage, having patriotically defeated Napoleon and Hitler, and proud of their status as a world power. They are content with the current free-market economy and the perks that come with it.
Russians are well-educated, disciplined, and knowledgeable about local and foreign affairs.
They love their country, and they prefer a steadfast leader. Therefore, they will vote for a candidate who will not only develop the country but also zealously protect Russia from foreign intervention.
Coincidentally or not, during his address to the nation last week, Putin said he would “continue to defend Russia’s freedom, preserve its history and traditions, further develop its democratic institutions, and protect its sovereignty, not allowing anyone to interfere in its internal affairs”.
(Somar Wijayadasa, a Moscoweducated international lawyer, was a Faculty Member of the University of Sri Lanka, worked in UN organisations (IAEA & FAO), was a Delegate of UNESCO to the UN General Assembly, and was a Representative of UNAIDS at the United Nations in New York).