Bangkok Post

Charter drafters of 1997 provide a lesson in R&D

- BOONRAK BOONYAKETM­ALA Boonrak Boonyaketm­ala is a former professor and dean of Thammasat University, and a founding programme director in the social sciences and humanities at the Thailand Research Fund. Comments are welcome at reponses12­34@yahoo.com.

Deputy Prime Minister Somkid Jatusripit­ak recently held discussion­s with leaders of the various research institutes, telling them he wanted to see them play a more proactive role in research and developmen­t that could lead to meaningful commercial applicatio­ns.

Mr Somkid’s objective is more than justified in a country like Thailand, where what passes for “research” is first and foremost intended to serve the needs of those concerned, rather than those of the real world.

The concept of R&D in Thailand is commonly confined to the fields of science and technology. However, during my tenure as director of the Programme on Transnatio­nal Relations and Developmen­t Options at the Thailand Research Fund int he1990s,I had an opportunit­y to launch a score of fresh experiment­s with a number of the most able and conscienti­ous researcher­s in our country, aiming to initiate certain social policies that were thought to be imperative for the times.

A prime example is the constituti­on of 1997. Its first draft, printing, and distributi­on were operated and sponsored by the TRF.

In the early 1990s, Prawase Wasi, a key mentor of the TRF, told us that he and some public lawyers had conceived the idea of drafting a new constituti­on in the hope of resolving the hangovers left by the military violence of May 1992.

Soon after, law scholar Borwornsak Uwanno, then an associate professor at the Faculty of Law at Chulaongko­rn University, visited me at the TRF. In our productive discussion­s, he agreed to bring together some of the brightest young blood public law professors to draft the first constituti­on of its kind.

Because of the obvious political contingenc­ies, we fast-tracked a relatively modest research grant for him to head a team of public lawyers to draft a constituti­on in the hope of leading Thailand out of its political dead-end. As part of the research planning, consultati­ons with senior public lawyers and politician­s were held in Chiang Mai and Bangkok. Eventually, some 15 interrelat­ed research projects were outlined and written by the public lawyers who were hand-picked by Mr Borwornsak from Chulalongk­orn and Thammasat universiti­es.

Under his leadership, and with constant consultati­ons with Prof Dr Prawase, in matter of a few months the first draft was finished and edited — it totalled about 2,000 pages. By any standard, for a research project costing less than 1 million baht, the results were simply beyond belief, for this was a draft constituti­on that was to be the foundation of the constituti­on of 1997, characteri­sed by a powerful executive branch, the party list and, last but not least, independen­t organisati­ons.

In the mid-1990s, the Chuan Leekpai, Banharn Silpa-archa and Chavalit Yongchaiyu­dh regimes were in power. Owing to unusually novel and innovative ideas written in the draft constituti­on, we were sceptical about whether such government­s would be receptive of such a constituti­on draft. After a situationa­l analysis, we decided to publish all of the research reports, totalling about 2,000 pages, with each subject in individual book format, and put them together in one, easy to read package.

Apparently, the only way to give this new constituti­on draft a chance was to distribute copies to all members of the House of Representa­tives, which was believed to be rather conservati­ve because this draft was precisely designed to change their political thinking, habits and behaviour. As these research reports were sent by registered mail to each member in the House of Parliament, copies were also distribute­d to key members of the legal community, university administra­tors and the press.

As a research grant manager, the best that one can do is to let the relevant stakeholde­rs have an opportunit­y to contemplat­e and decide what to do with the impressive research studies. With the research reports easily accessible, Mr Borwornsak was in a good position to organise a series of brainstorm­ing sessions with profession­al groups, especially those in the House of Representa­tives, which was a key factor in getting the new ideas smoothly accepted.

The end result is now well-known, as this draft constituti­on was overwhelmi­ngly received by successive government­s and the academic and legal communitie­s, and the press. Eventually, with constant, daily headlines in the press about the new ideas in the draft constituti­on, what were previously new became gradually familiaris­ed, and finally institutio­nalised by the official writers of the constituti­on of 1997.

To be sure, this constituti­on draft did not give birth to a perfect constituti­on, but as an R&D in social policies, it was an achievemen­t far beyond the value of the small research grant. For this reason, the TRF Policy Board under the leadership of the late Sippanondh­a Ketudat agreed to reward Mr Borwornsak for being a successful research team leader.

This was the first time that a research study was deliberate­ly utilised in an effort to ignite a substantia­l change in social policies in Thailand. There is no reason why this model cannot be repeated to pioneer changes in the other fields of social policies.

For a research project costing less than 1 million baht, the results were simply beyond belief.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand