Bangkok Post

If you’re willing to take an educated gamble on a performanc­e diesel, both Audi and BMW have plenty to offer.

Despite the headlines and hullabaloo, now could be the perfect time to buy a fast diesel executive car. But does Audi or Alpina rule the roost?

- By Matt Saunders

The diesel-gate scandal will have to run on for a long time yet, in this tester’s opinion, before it starts to seriously dent the appeal of either the Alpina D3 Biturbo or Audi A7 BiTDI Black Edition. Fully loaded l uxury executive cars are rarely more tempting than when they’re packing large diesel engines that combine instant and easy pace with strong fuel economy.

Some will say that now’s the wrong time to be spending big on a performanc­e diesel. Let them say it. My reply is that the uncertaint­y only strengthen­s your bargaining position.

So, assuming you’re willing to take an educated gamble, which way should you jump? It wasn’t very long ago that the decision would have been made for you. BMW had the fast diesel niche largely sewn up for a decade or more. That was until three years ago, when Audi started ushering its 3.0-litre, 300hp-plus BiTDI V6 diesel into its A6, A7 and Q5, giving people an alternativ­e to BMW’s 35d models for the first time.

Renowned BMW tuner Alpina subsequent­ly leaped to the defence of Munich’s honour, fitting an overhauled 345hp twin-turbo 3.0-litre straight six into its D5 Biturbo in 2012, and then into the current F30-generation 3 Series-based D3 Biturbo in 2013. The D3 Biturbo was cracked up as the fastest diesel production car in the world and, along with the rest of the 3 Series, has just been facelifted.

So as well as the many mechanical tweaks to the standard 3 Series’ steering and suspension made for BMW’s facelift this year, the Alpina D3 Biturbo inherits BMW’s improved interior, on top of which Alpina adds its own inimitable layer of material lavishness, notably via beautifull­y tactile lavalina leathers and downy Alcantara.

Alpina’s usual hallmarks — white-on-blue instrument­s, Alcantara steering wheel with blue and green stitching, those Alpina crests on the steering wheel boss and seats — lift the 3 Series’ ambience to new heights of richness and charisma.

But the A7’s interior is equally rich in its own way and even more solidly constructe­d, although its style is much more restrained. Our test car’s mix of black, silver and grey trims make for a much more sombre feel than the D3’s.

But although some of the Audi’s fittings are showing their age, its technical highlights — intelligen­t LED headlights and a large multifunct­ion colour trip computer capable of relaying navigation mapping in crisp detail, to name just a couple — still really distinguis­h the car.

The Audi’s front seats are larger and more comfortabl­e than the Alpina’s, its second row better endowed with leg room and its boot more generous on overall capacity in normal five-seat mode, below the window line. The Audi is the bigger car, of course, so such things should be expected.

Sure, the Alpina’s cabin is the warmer and more inviting, but it’s the Audi that’s the more luxurious, and comfort matters in an everyday-use high-mileage motorway machine.

But outside-lane punch matters, too. And although the Audi’s superior size wins it points on long-range comfort, it also threatens to prevent it from scoring as a driver’s car. Being at a disadvanta­ge to the Alpina on peak power and torque is one thing. Exacerbati­ng that with almost 200kg of extra kerb weight is another.

But in practice, the difference between the D3 and A7 on outright performanc­e is only just large enough to notice — and there’s actually a bigger difference in the style of delivery. In other words, these apparently quite similar cars are separated not so much by how fast they go, but how they go fast.

The Alpina’s straight six has a more sporting edge than the Audi’s V6. It wants to tear up the rulebook and rev like a turbo petrol engine — and its gearbox is tuned to allow that, being always keen to kick down and often reaching a ratio lower in the ZF eight-speed gearbox than you expect.

Flex the D3’s accelerato­r and you’ll find engine and gearbox work to keep the revs between 3,500rpm and 4,800rpm. That, in turn, maximises the rate of accelerati­on, but it doesn’t conform to the fast diesel stereotype by falling back on a tide of mid-range torque.

The Audi, by contrast, does exactly what you expect it to do when you waft the accelerato­r pedal towards the carpet. It plays the performanc­e GT instead of the sports saloon, choosing a higher gear, pulling from lower revs, riding its surge of torque from around 2,500rpm and rushing forwards like a powerboat rising out of Lake Como.

All of a sudden, the car doesn’t feel all of its near-two tonnes. Audi’s exhaust-mounted “sound actuator” (a speaker to you and me) helps to fashion a more exotic warble for the car than the Alpina has and makes the engine one you can enjoy listening to — once you get over the fact that what you’re listening to isn’t really engine noise at all. It gives the A7’s performanc­e a qualitativ­e vibrancy as a repost to the D3’s superior quantitati­ve urge.

All of which seems to be gently nudging us towards the conclusion that these cars aren’t actually cut from the same cloth at all, a suspicion that their ride and handling traits only confirm.

Both cars strike a pleasingly pragmatic, road-appropriat­e compromise. Both are more supple and softly sprung than their 500-horsepower M and RS-badged petrol equivalent­s and can be laid back one moment and then agile and entertaini­ng the next. But whereas the Alpina is a true athlete in air-cushioned loafers, the Audi feels more like a uniformed doorman in running shoes.

The Audi tries mostly to insulate your fingertips and backside from the workings of its mechanical­s and the variabilit­y of the road surface under its wheels, allowing you to plough on as unperturbe­d as possible. In stark contrast, the Alpina’s chassis and steering acknowledg­e all but somehow filter out the patina of the road’s surface better than the Audi, while still feeding back the influences of traction, road camber, wheel deflection and cornering load much better through its controls and bodily reactions.

The D3’s ride is slightly the firmer and more reactive and, at times, the A7’s body control is better, keeping its body flatter when push really comes to shove. But when the road is smoother, the Alpina’s agility and superior balance of grip make it a far more rewarding steer than the Audi, because it corners with more alacrity and engages its driver more vividly.

The D3 Biturbo plays perfectly to an audience of keen drivers who want to live in a world where a BMW M3 would be the perfect everyday car — but simultaneo­usly recognise that they don’t.

They accept that they need something relatively economical, comfortabl­e and sensible, but want to look forward to driving that “something” every bit as much as they would a 500hp super-saloon.

So the D3 Biturbo is this test’s irresistib­le and thoroughly deserving winner.

But it’s a winner on points, not by knockout, because the A7 BiTDI retains its appeal alongside its conqueror as the more elegant, luxurious, laid-back choice. You could even argue that it’s the more fit-for-purpose car here, for the wearing, high-mileage use that powerful diesel execs get. And, as losing hands go, that’s not a bad one.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? LACKING FEEL: You’re more insulated from the action in the A7, which feels more of a performanc­e GT.
LACKING FEEL: You’re more insulated from the action in the A7, which feels more of a performanc­e GT.
 ??  ?? RARING TO GO: The D3 gives the kind of feedback that keen drivers seek and its engine thrives on revs.
RARING TO GO: The D3 gives the kind of feedback that keen drivers seek and its engine thrives on revs.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand