Bangkok Post

Europe has now enshrined Islamophob­ia in law

- SOFIA AHMED INDEPENDEN­T ©THE Sofia Ahmed is an activist, writer and journalist.

Islam and Muslims are no longer welcome in Europe. If that message wasn’t already clear to most people it has been set in law yesterday by EU judges. The decision by the European Court of Justice to allow employers to ban staff from wearing the headscarf seems certain to only further marginalis­e and push Muslim women out of public life.

With France’s ban on the niqab in 2010, and countries such as Germany wanting to follow suit, the trend of enshrining Islamophob­ia into law became increasing­ly common. Proponents of such policies deceptivel­y told the public these decisions will emancipate Muslim women from the proposed shackles of Islam. Yet, what these laws represent is a discrimina­tory form of social engineerin­g to try and enforce Muslim women to adopt a secular identity.

Such discrimina­tory and openly xenophobic policies contradict Europe’s inherent belief that it is a bastion of freedom in an otherwise barbaric and intolerant world. The hypocrisy is galling to say the least — the very European leaders that pit themselves against supposedly misogynist­ic and regressive societies in the Muslim world have no qualms in applying discrimina­tory and gendered Islamophob­ia towards Muslim women in their own countries.

They convenient­ly ignore the impact that such legislatio­n is having on the lives of ordinary Muslim women. An inquiry by the Women and Equalities Committee found that Muslim women were three times less likely to be employed. The report highlighte­d the role of “unconsciou­s bias” in discrimina­tion against women that wear the hijab or have Muslim sounding names.

A similar report by the European Network Against Racism, which covered eight countries ranging from France to The Netherland­s, suggests that the such discrimina­tion in the workplace and it’s negative impact on Muslim women is widespread across Europe.

Economic marginalis­ation is of course not the only obstacle that women must face due to decisions like the one made today. There are much more dire consequenc­es for the average woman on the streets of London or Paris. With reports of a woman in hijab being dragged along the streets of London and another woman attacked and bitten for wearing hijab in Vienna, what kind of message does this sends out to those people that find a piece of cloth offensive enough to attack a woman for it?

Alarmingly, the decision the EU judges made is strikingly like the anti-Jewish legislatio­n that was passed in Germany prior to World War II. The Nuremberg laws specifical­ly targeted a social group by restrictin­g them on an economic level. Jews were banned from profession­s such as midwifery and law, and state contracts were cancelled with Jewish-owned businesses. That is not dissimilar to telling a woman that she is not welcome at a workplace if she decides to identify as a member of a given faith.

There will be those that hail today’s decision as a victory for Europe’s long held secular ideals. However, history tells us that such excuses are always used to justify much more sinister trajectori­es. This new ban is a worrying indication of Europe’s hostility towards its Muslims citizens.

Let us not forget that it was in times of similar social and economic upheaval that Europe’s Jews became the scapegoats for all of society’s ills. It’s increasing­ly becoming apparent that history might be repeating itself as Muslim women become the new victims of Europe’s identity crises ensuing from its social and economic woes.

The decision the EU judges made is like the anti-Jewish legislatio­n that was passed in Germany.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand