Peers seek terror, trade, climate deals
TAORMINA: The differences are wellknown: climate change, trade and migration threaten to throw a summit of the Group of Seven wealthy democracies off its consensus game, with US President Donald Trump cast as the spoiler-in-chief. But it may not play out exactly that way, according to long-time G7 observers.
“It is a forum made for Donald Trump’s particular style. It is highly informal, highly interactive and they speak in very colloquial language to each other,” said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto.
“It is the ultimate lonely hearts club. No one understands how tough it is to have the top job except the peers with the top job in other countries.”
While Mr Trump has met all of the leaders one on one, this will be the first time all seven are around the same table, including also newcomers Emmanuel Macron of France, Theresa May of the United Kingdom and the Italian host, Paolo Gentiloni — forging a new dynamic after a year of global political turmoil amid rising nationalism.
Climate policy promises to be the real buzzkill at the G7 party. Endorsing measures to combat terror is expected to find easy agreement, especially after the attack on a Manchester pop music concert killed 22 people on Monday night. But some of the trust that fuels such meetings was undermined by a leak of British intelligence in the Manchester attack blamed on a US official, prompting the UK to decide not to share further intelligence in the case. Mr Trump is also going against the grain on trade with more protectionist stand.
His pending review of US climate policies and decision not to make up his mind before Taormina has braced environmentalists for the possibility of bland language that says little after years of increasingly stronger commitments to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and emissions of in greenhouse gases under the Paris Agreement.
“What we do not want to see is a false compromise on nothing,” said Tobias Muenchmeyer, a political expert for Greenpeace.
“We want to see determination and commitment over unity,” with the other partners going ahead without the United States.