Clear up all bridge doubts

ABangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) plan to build a pedestrian bridge that that will link Bangkok’s Tha Phra Chan and Wang Lang area on the Thon Buri side has drawn heavy criticism and strong opposition. The criticism comes from academics who question the cost-effectiveness of the bridge that will cost taxpayers about 1.7 billion baht. Simply put, they do not think the project is worth building.

It was reported in social media that the BMA spent 50 million baht on the project’s feasibility study which took nine months. The BMA claims that the study, conducted by four consultant firms — Epsilon, Final Design, Plan Pro, and United Analyst and Engineering — shows bright prospects for the project.

Some academics have blasted the proposed structure which they say is too large, at nine metres wide, with two levels at a height of four metres each. Others have criticised it as visual pollution — an eyesore.

There are questions about the appropriateness of the designated spot in a narrow part of the river. With such a huge structure, the bridge will need strong, large foundation posts which are likely to affect the river flow that may lead to other problems relating to water transport.

In defending the project, the Public Works Department says the planned bridge is designed for pedestrians, cyclists and the disabled. Since Wang Lang is connected to Siriraj Hospital, the BMA says it will provide easier access to people who need to visit the hospital. Interestingly, the study suggests the bridge will help commuters to depend less on ferries which are considered by some to be unsafe.

According to the Public Works Department, the spot will connect Rama VIII Bridge to Phran Nok and Buddha Monthon Sai 4 roads; the Chao Phraya River’s sky walk and promenade project; and the Light Red and western Orange Line electric railways which link Taling Chan and Salaya and Taling Chan and Thailand Cultural Centre respectively.

But this is another project, while touted as a city landmark, that has sparked controversy. The BMA cannot convince the public to agree with its Chao Phraya promenade project which has been inundated with criticism.

Putting questions about design and appearance aside, the planned bridge has drawn flak largely because of the process which gave little importance to people’s participation. The previous two hearings passed without the public noticing. The third hearing which took place earlier this week came as a surprise.

We have still not heard the views of the Committee on the Conservation of Rattanakosin and Old Towns and the Fine Arts Department about the project that will alter the look of Bangkok’s old town quarters permanently.

Given the fact that the project is designed with an aim to promote the city’s “walkability”, the BMA deserves a round of applause. We indeed need facilities to make Bangkok more walkable.

But city administrators must realise that walkability can be achieved without such a huge structure. On the contrary, a structure that is designed appropriately, in a more suitable location, may be worth considering.

Claim by consultants the bridge will reduce the use of ferries are absurd. Over past decades, ferry boat services have provided an alternative travel mode that enables commuters to escape from traffic. It is the duty of the BMA and relevant agencies to ensure the safety of ferry boat services which enhance city walkability.

With such public opposition, it is necessary the BMA goes back to square one and clears all doubt. More public hearings are needed. It must be a process that ensures genuine participation, not just a ceremonial one that seeks to justify a shameful project.

Claims the bridge will reduce the use of ferries are absurd.