Bangkok Post

PROGRESS PROMISED

Some thorny issues remain unsettled

- YUSSEL GONZALEZ

After five days in Mexico City, negotiator­s overhaulin­g the Nafta deal say they will have ‘results’ by the end of the month.

MEXICO CITY: Negotiator­s overhaulin­g the North American Free Trade Agreement said on Tuesday that they would have “results” by the end of the month, but left some of the stickiest issues hanging as they wrapped up their latest talks.

After five days of negotiatio­ns in Mexico City — their second round — the United States, Mexico and Canada still had no concrete details to report on their revamp of the 1994 trade deal.

But they promised progress by the end of the next round, scheduled for September 23 to 27 in Ottawa, Canada.

“We have instructed our chief negotiator­s to commit to defining the chapters that are closest to completion so we can start seeing the first results at the third round of talks,” Mexican Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo told a press conference.

In the build-up to the second round, President Donald Trump, who demanded the renegotiat­ion, renewed his attacks on Nafta, blaming the deal for US job losses — a regular theme during his campaign — and saying the United States would “end up probably terminatin­g” it.

US Trade Representa­tive Robert Lighthizer was more conciliato­ry in Mexico City, reporting that “we have found mutual agreement on many important issues,” and saying negotiator­s were working at “record pace.”

But he echoed Trump’s rhetoric on Mexico’s impact on the US manufactur­ing sector.

“We also must address the needs of those harmed by the current Nafta, especially our manufactur­ing workers. We must have a trade agreement that benefits all Americans, and not just some at the expense of others,” Lighthizer said.

“I am hopeful we can arrive at an agreement that helps American workers, farmers and ranchers while also raising the living standards of workers in Mexico and Canada.”

Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland said negotiator­s were working toward a “win-win-win” deal.

“I am here to say that all three partners are absolutely committed to getting this done,” she said.

Some thorny issues were left unsettled, however, including the $64 billion US trade deficit with Mexico — much lamented by Trump — and the “rules of origin.”

The United States is pushing to change these rules, including those governing the hotly debated auto sector. It has floated the idea of requiring a certain percentage of cars’ components to be built in the US in order to remain duty-free.

Guajardo told journalist­s no official US proposal had yet been tabled on either matter.

He reported progress on other points, such as eliminatin­g technical barriers to trade — without going into detail.

Negotiator­s said they had tackled more than two dozen chapters of the 1,700page deal.

“The lack of details in the negotiatio­ns show that the room of manoeuvre and the depth of the changes is likely to be limited,” said the Eurasia Group consultanc­y.

“All three parties will work to reach an agreement and not alter Nafta fundamenta­lly.”

Instituted in 1994, Nafta eliminated most tariffs across a region representi­ng some 28% of the world economy.

To supporters, it has been instrument­al in creating tightly integrated supply chains that ensured North America’s competitiv­eness.

To opponents, it has gutted American industry and unleashed a race to the bottom in terms of wages.

Low wages in Mexico were under a microscope during this round of talks.

The daily minimum wage, about $4.50, is well below the hourly minimum wage in both the US and Canada.

Mexico, which became a major exporter under Nafta — sending some 80% of its exports to the United States — has some of the worst wages in Latin America.

Wages have been basically stagnant here for the past 23 years in inflation-adjusted terms, despite Nafta proponents’ argument that free trade would cause them to rise.

Both the US and Canada are pressuring Mexico on the issue.

But Guajardo said Mexico would reject any attempt to “set salaries by decree.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand