Bangkok Post

Memo doesn’t clear Trump: Dems, GOP

Paper seen as attempt to undermine FBI

-

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump was wrong to assert that a GOP-produced classified memo on FBI surveillan­ce powers cleared him in the Russia investigat­ion, Democratic and Republican lawmakers said.

They expressed hope on Sunday that special counsel Robert Mueller’s work would continue without interferen­ce.

Democrats may have sought a vote on publicly releasing their rebuttal memo when the GOP-led House Intelligen­ce Committee was due to meet late yesterday afternoon. The committee rejected that move last week, with one Republican member saying revisions were needed so the memo would not endanger national security. The Senate’s Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer of New York, urged Mr Trump to back the public release and said that refusing to do so would show the president’s intent to undermine the Russia investigat­ion.

The committee’s top Democrat, California Rep Adam Schiff, branded the GOP memo “a political hit job”. He questioned whether the chairman, Rep Devin Nunes, California, had coordinate­d with the White House in drafting the document seized on by the president to vent his grievances against the nation’s premier law enforcemen­t agencies.

“The goal here is to undermine the FBI, discredit the FBI, discredit the Mueller investigat­ion, do the president’s bidding,” Mr Schiff said. “I think it’s very possible his staff worked with the White House.”

Mr Nunes was asked during a Jan 29 committee meeting whether he had coordinate­d the memo with the White House. “As far as I know, no,” he responded, then refused to answer when asked whether his staff members had communicat­ed with the White House. He had previously apologised for sharing with the White House secret intelligen­ce intercepts related to an investigat­ion of Russian election interferen­ce before talking to committee members.

Mr Trump’s tweet on Saturday that the memo “totally vindicates ‘Trump’ in probe” even as “the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on” found no echo from four committee Republican­s who appeared on the Sunday talk shows.

Rep Brad Wenstrup, Ohio, said, “I think this is a separate issue”. Rep Chris Stewart, Utah, said: “No, it doesn’t end that”.

Rep Will Hurd, Texas, said: “I don’t”, when asked whether he agreed with Mr Trump.

Rep Trey Gowdy, South Carolina, when asked whether the memo affected the investigat­ion, said: “No, not to me, it doesn’t, and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it”.

The Democratic response was more expected: “Of course, not at all”, said Schiff. Added Sen Dick Durbin, Illinois: “No, of course it does not.”

Lawmakers also said the memo should not impede Mr Mueller.

“I think it would be a mistake for anyone to suggest that the special counsel shouldn’t complete his work. I support his work. I want him to finish it. I hope he finishes it as quickly as possible,” Mr Stewart said.

The memo released on Friday alleges misconduct on the part of the FBI and the Justice Department in obtaining a warrant under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to monitor former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and his ties to Russia.

Specifical­ly, it takes aim at the FBI’s use of informatio­n from former British spy Christophe­r Steele, who compiled a dossier containing allegation­s of ties between Mr Trump, his associates and Russia.

The underlying materials that served as the basis for the warrant applicatio­n were not made public in the GOP memo. Even as Democrats described it as inaccurate, some Republican­s quickly cited the memo — released over the objections of the FBI and Justice Department — in their arguments that Mr Mueller’s investigat­ion is politicall­y tainted.

The memo’s central allegation is that agents and prosecutor­s, in applying in October 2016 to monitor Mr Page’s communicat­ions, failed to tell a judge that the opposition research that provided grounds for the FBI’s suspicion received funding from Hillary Clinton’s presidenti­al campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Mr Page had stopped advising the campaign sometime around the end of that summer.

Mr Steele’s research, according to the memo, “formed an essential part” of the warrant applicatio­n.

But it’s unclear how much or what informatio­n Mr Steele collected made it into the applicatio­n, or how much has been corroborat­ed.

Republican­s say a j udge should have known that “political actors” were involved in allegation­s that led the Justice Department to believe Mr Page might be an agent of a foreign power, an accusation he has denied.

The memo confirms the FBI’s counterint­elligence investigat­ion into the Trump campaign, which began in July 2016, months before the surveillan­ce warrant was sought, and was “triggered” by informatio­n concerning campaign aide George Papadopoul­os.

He pleaded guilty last year to lying to the FBI.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand