Bangkok Post

RED, HOT AND BLUE RS4 VS C63 S

If you feel the need to lug stuff about at speed, is a bit of driver involvemen­t too much to ask? Here are four very potent estates

-

The explosive Audi RS2, all 315hp of it, is often reckoned to be the world’s first high-performanc­e estate. Certainly it was the first car to combine the practicali­ty of a bigger-booted wagon body with the straight-line speed of a supercar.

Thanks to its quattro four-wheel-drive system and punchy turbocharg­ed engine, it was actually faster to 50kph than the mighty McLaren F1 of the mid-1990s — but the first rapid estate car it was not.

BMW’s E34 M5 Touring had arrived two years before it, in 1992, albeit in lefthand-drive markets only. Another two years before that, Subaru had endowed an estate car with more power than was strictly necessary by offering the Legacy with as much as 200hp in its home market of Japan.

Whether it was Audi, BMW or Subaru that invented the fast estate is a matter for debate, then. But which manufactur­er builds the best high-performanc­e wagons in 2018? That we can answer for certain.

As the leading proponents of the breed, it’s a face-off between Audi Sport and Mercedes-AMG. First, we’ll pitch Neckarsulm’s brand new RS4 against Affalterba­ch’s C63 S, before lining the RS6 up against the E63 S. Only then will one of these German companies be crowned king of the crushingly fast estate car.

Beneath its bonnet, the RS4 has come full circle. Between 2006 and 2015, the Mk2 and Mk3 RS4 were propelled by highrevvin­g, normally aspirated V8s, the kind of engine that made you prod the throttle pedal not only for the surge in accelerati­on but also for the serrated edge to the power delivery and the dramatic, soaring soundtrack. This fourth-gen RS4 junks the 4.2-litre V8 in favour of a twin-turbo V6 — the same configurat­ion of motor that powered the first RS4 back in 1999.

Giving up a pair of cylinders and more than a litre of displaceme­nt to the AMG C63 S puts the RS4 at a disadvanta­ge. The Merc’s 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 is comfortabl­y more potent than the Audi’s V6 — in fact, with 510hp to 450hp it’s not even close — and it feels it. Whereas the RS4 is simply very quick, the C63 S has the sort of unrelentin­g, runaway-train straight-line performanc­e that makes your passengers panic.

Sure, the four-wheel-drive RS4 is quicker off the line, but everywhere else the Mercedes emphatical­ly hauls itself off into the distance. More important than its sheer performanc­e advantage, however, is the manner with which the AMG delivers its power.

It’s a lunatic, walloping along on a tidal wave of torque, quad exhaust tips spewing forth a torrent of fire and fury, traction control fighting desperatel­y to keep the two driven wheels from roasting the rubber wrapped around them.

The RS4? Its engine is perhaps a little more responsive but it offers nothing like the thump to your back. The soundtrack is strained and bland even though this test car, like its counterpar­t, is fitted with the optional sports exhaust. That’s aside from an odd, occasional whining noise under full load, as though there’s a supercharg­er up front rather than a pair of turbos. The V6 spins quickly to the limiter. But with all four contact patches sharing a much-reduced load, the Audi simply punts along without a hint of a drama. Effective, then, but entirely forgettabl­e.

And yet in some important ways, this RS4 is the best of the dynasty. It has balance for one thing, thanks to the new V6 weighing some 31kg less than the old V8 and sitting further back in the chassis. This RS4 doesn’t chase its nose like RS4s of old. And if you over-commit to a corner, you’ll just as likely feel the rear end come round as sense the front pushing on. That is a deeply unusual — but brilliant — thing to feel in an Audi estate car. It means the car is less frustratin­g at the limit than its forebears. Out of a corner it feels positive and agile, too, the RS sport differenti­al diverting drive to the outside rear corner to great effect.

The second huge step forward from old RS4 to new is the ride quality. Rolling on the optional RS sport suspension, the latest model has a plushness to it over rough roads whereas the previous model was tight and unyielding.

But despite those very commendabl­e steps forward, it is the C63 S that is the more involving and rewarding performanc­e car. It steers more faithfully, it’s more playful and agile and it’s better balanced still. The ways in which its body moves and rolls in corners makes it easier to read and manipulate at the limit, too, and if you switch the stability systems off it can play the hooligan in the finest AMG tradition. The Mercedes is simply a lot more fun.

Does a performanc­e estate really need to be fun to drive, or is fast and competent good enough? Perhaps it is, in which case the new RS4 is a very fine car indeed. But if you happen to think that a performanc­e car should be in some way engaging to drive regardless of its body type, as we happen to, then the Mercedes-AMG is the clear victor.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Audi’s 4WD means its power is delivered in a more sanitised manner explaining the same 4.1sec 0-100kph as the Merc; the C63 not only has more performanc­e but it also delivers it in a more engaging way.
Audi’s 4WD means its power is delivered in a more sanitised manner explaining the same 4.1sec 0-100kph as the Merc; the C63 not only has more performanc­e but it also delivers it in a more engaging way.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The RS4 produces 450hp and 600Nm from its downsized 2.9-litre twin-turbo V6;
C63 S makes a more compelling 510hp and 700Nm from a 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8.
The RS4 produces 450hp and 600Nm from its downsized 2.9-litre twin-turbo V6; C63 S makes a more compelling 510hp and 700Nm from a 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand