Bangkok Post

PROFIT VS PROTECTION

Oil and gas drilling in ‘Australia’s Galapagos’ raises hopes of jobs, fears of spill.

- By Jacqueline Williams in Port Lincoln, Australia New York Times

It has been called Australia’s answer to the Galapagos: a stretch of rich, pristine ocean facing the Antarctic that is home to calving whales and teeming fisheries that have turned local boat captains into tuna barons.

But now the waters of the Great Australian Bight have drawn a different sort of resource industry: The Norwegian oil company Statoil plans to start drilling by the end of 2019 to tap what experts call one of the world’s great remaining natural gas reserves.

Here in a country built on resource extraction, where the fossil fuel industry has a long history of political connection­s that often give it priority over the environmen­t, people fear that this haven for some of the most unusual marine life in the world will be damaged and put at even greater risk from a spill.

“Our fishing industry, our tourism industry, our lifestyle, our local food and our wildlife all depend on a pristine coastline,” said a marine adventure company employee, Elise Lavers, while swimming with endangered Australian sea lions. She calls the Bight one of the world’s best-kept environmen­tal secrets.

“We have too much at stake to allow oil drilling in the Great Australian Bight to occur.”

The pressure to seek an oil and gas bonanza is especially intense because of local politics: Much of the Bight extends along the state of South Australia, a struggling post-industrial area where talk of jobs and economic growth dominated a recent local election.

Whether to open the Bight to drilling was a crucial issue in the election last month to select lawmakers for the state Parliament. Politician­s at the national level have chimed in over the years, with pro-growth candidates arguing that the oil and gas industry would create jobs and wealth in South Australia and beyond for decades to come.

“Statoil’s decision to undertake exploratio­n is good news for the South Australian economy,” said Matt Canavan, a conservati­ve senator from Queensland. Even though pro-drilling candidates won in hard-fought races, plans to extract natural gas still have to be approved by regulators. Statoil insists that exploratio­n will be safe.

Australia has reached its 27th consecutiv­e year without a recession by supplying energy and raw materials like iron ore to the manufactur­ing economies of Asia, and particular­ly China. Opening the Bight to drilling would help Australia stay on track to eclipse Qatar as the world’s largest exporter of natural gas by 2020.

But opposition to the drilling plan highlights the limitation­s of relying so heavily on the exploitati­on of natural resources. The plan has met surprising­ly strong resistance, despite the need for jobs in a region where manufactur­ing used to employ one in five workers. Six town councils have raised objections to the drilling.

Communitie­s on the southern coast are questionin­g whether the government can justify putting at risk a unique marine wilderness area that supports the country’s most valuable fisheries and a tourism industry worth more than $1 billion.

The Bight gets its name from its appearance: From space, it looks as if a giant bit into the southern coast. The crescent-shaped bay runs for more than 1,100 kilometres, lined by the longest stretch of sea cliffs in the world.

Port Lincoln, a small seaside town of around 16,000 people where sealing and whaling date back to the 1820s, is the main jumping-off point for access to the Bight. Today, the enormous wealth that it continues to bring is evident in the mansions that dot its coast — homes of the tuna barons who have made millions from selling to Japan, where sushi chefs pay top dollar for Australian tuna.

“There’s potential for an oil spill that would be catastroph­ic for the industry and other industries along the coast,” said Robbie Staunton, marine operations manager at Stehr Group, a major Australian seafood company.

Computer modeling by the British oil company BP, which withdrew in 2016 from its plan to drill in the Bight, projected that an accident similar to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout in the US could cause environmen­tal damage along a wide stretch of the southern Australian coastline. This raised local concerns, particular­ly because the Bight’s waters are deeper, rougher and more remote than those of the Gulf of Mexico.

The projection also raised another problem: whether Australia was even equipped to deal with an accident at an offshore drilling platform. The equipment needed to contain a blowout by capping the flow of oil is thousands of kilometres away in Singapore, and would take up to 35 days to put in place.

“History shows that the risks are often substantia­l,” said Kirsten Rough, a researcher for the tuna industry for more than two decades.

There are also environmen­tal risks in the techniques used to locate the oil and gas before drilling begins. Seismic surveys rely on loud explosions that, according to researcher­s, could drive fish away — especially the tuna that matter most to the area.

Fishermen say they have already noticed disruption­s in the movements of tuna since the surveys began.

Others in the fishing industry, though, are more resigned to sharing the waters with drilling rigs. Though initially opposed to the drilling, Hagen Stehr said the focus should shift to making sure that its impact is limited. This would include ensuring that seismic surveys are not conducted during the times of year when the hauls of fish are the largest.

“You can’t stop the developmen­t in the Bight,” said Stehr, one of the town’s best-known tuna barons, in his Port Lincoln office.

“What right have we got to have exclusive rights?” asked Stehr, a native of Germany who started fishing tuna by hand after jumping ship in Port Lincoln in 1960. “South Australia is on its knees.”

Others worry that drilling will push a fragile environmen­t past its limit.

“The Great Australian Bight is Australia’s Galapagos,” said Jeff Hansen, who led a ship from the environmen­tal activist group Sea Shepherd, which docked in the state last month to persuade politician­s to protect the Bight.

“Risking it in a push to expand the fossil fuel industry is the height of irresponsi­bility.”

Many local residents harbour deep suspicions about the drilling. They describe a lack of transparen­cy about deals between politician­s and big business that has led to a mood of distrust, and a sense of defeat.

“You know you’ll be told this is safe as can be,” said Brendan Guidera, an owner of Pristine Oysters in Coffin Bay, a coastal town near Port Lincoln famed for its oysters.

“When there’s so much money behind something like this, you don’t necessaril­y trust everything you’re told.”

Our fishing industry, our tourism industry, our lifestyle, our local food and our wildlife all depend on a pristine coastline. We have too much at stake to allow oil drilling in the Great Australian Bight to occur ELISE LAVERS Marine adventure company employee

 ??  ?? Wayne Wall sets out cages at an oyster farm in Coffin Bay, where growers fear drilling would hurt their livelihood­s.
Wayne Wall sets out cages at an oyster farm in Coffin Bay, where growers fear drilling would hurt their livelihood­s.
 ??  ?? Diver Mark Taffener surfaces after inspecting a southern bluefin tuna cage in the Bight near Port Lincoln.
Diver Mark Taffener surfaces after inspecting a southern bluefin tuna cage in the Bight near Port Lincoln.
 ??  ?? Port Lincoln is a centre for tourism because of its ready access to the Bight.
Port Lincoln is a centre for tourism because of its ready access to the Bight.
 ??  ?? A fishing boat heads out into the waters of the Great Australian Bight from Port Lincoln.
A fishing boat heads out into the waters of the Great Australian Bight from Port Lincoln.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand