BoJ dials down inflation view

Kuroda pledges to keep easy policy intact

The Bank of Japan yesterday downgraded its view on inflation in a fresh blow to its long-held 2% price goal, giving the central bank barely any room to manoeuvre as it tries to map a path to roll back its crisis-era stimulus.

As widely expected, the BoJ maintained its ultra-loose monetary policy, keeping its short-term interest rate target at -0.1% and a pledge to guide 10-year government bond yields around 0%.

The move contrasts with the European Central Bank’s decision to end its asset-purchase programme this year and the US Federal Reserve’s steady rate increases, which signalled a break from policies deployed to battle the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

“Consumer price growth is in a range of 0.5 to 1%,” the BoJ said in a statement accompanying the decision. That was a slightly bleaker view than in the previous meeting in April, when the bank said inflation was moving around 1%.

BoJ governor Haruhiko Kuroda conceded that price growth remained “somewhat weak” despite a solid economic recovery. But he blamed it mostly on temporary factors like past yen rises that pushed down prices of durable goods, made mostly by imported parts.

“More companies, particularly in the service industry, are passing on rising costs to consumers. Companies’ pricesetting behaviour appears to be changing. The economy is sustaining momentum to achieve the BoJ’s 2% inflation target,” Kuroda told a news conference after the policy meeting.

The BoJ stuck to its view the economy was expanding moderately, unfazed by a first-quarter contraction that many analysts blame on temporary factors like bad weather.

But it also maintained its cautious assessment on prospects for hitting its elusive 2% inflation target, saying that inflation expectations were moving sideways.

The central bank said it would continue buy bonds so that the balance of its holdings increases at an annual pace of 80 trillion yen ($722.67 billion).

The delay in pulling out of crisis-era stimulus would leave the BoJ with a lack of ammunition to fight another economic downturn, even as its US and European peers start restocking their tool-kit.

“It is almost certain the BoJ will cut its inflation forecasts at its next meeting in July, when it conducts a quarterly review of its projections,’’ said Hiroshi Miyazaki, senior economist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities.

“The BoJ is already stealth tapering and it wants to sound out markets for an exit, but it may have to wait until inflation gets above at least 1%.”

The central bank has been slowing its bond buying to around half the pace it commits to purchase annually, arguing that it can keep long-term rates around its yield target with less purchases due to its dominance in the bond market.

In a sign of concern over feeble price growth, BoJ board member Goushi Kataoka — a consistent, sole dissenter to keeping policy steady — said the bank should ramp up stimulus if it offers a bleaker view on inflation expectations in the future.

Japan’s economy shrank an annualised 0.6% in the first quarter, though many analysts expect growth to bounce back on solid exports and capital expenditure.

Before the latest contraction, the economy benefited from a global exports boom that continues to underpin a synchronised uptick in world growth.

Core consumer prices rose 0.7% in April from a year earlier, slowing for the second straight month, casting doubt on the BoJ’s view a solid recovery will prompt firms to raise wages and help accelerate inflation to its target.

Given weak inflation, the central bank may look more closely into structural factors that may be holding back price growth at its July meeting, according to sources familiar with its thinking.

“No matter how long the BoJ continues its current easing, it won’t be able to achieve 2% inflation target for the foreseeable future,” said Izuru Kato, chief economist at Totan Research.

“The Fed and ECB are moving flexibly to rectify excessive monetary stimulus as their economies expand, but the BoJ would lack such flexibility in guiding policy as long as it persists in achieving the 2% inflation target.”