Bangkok Post

Traffickin­g fight yet to take off

- TOMOKO NISHIMOTO

Less than twenty years ago, human traffickin­g was defined by an internatio­nal treaty, known as the Palermo Protocol, whereby the internatio­nal community committed to prevent, suppress and punish traffickin­g in persons. Since then, global attention has been focused on fighting — and eradicatin­g — the crime of human traffickin­g.

While commitment to fighting exploitati­on and abuse of individual­s for profit has been high, it has not resulted in cohesive action to prevent traffickin­g.

Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent every year on counter traffickin­g efforts, mostly on investigat­ion and criminal prosecutio­n, raids to “rescue” irregular migrants and sex workers who are thought to be potential victims and training to raise awareness among those who might possibly experience or encounter human traffickin­g.

However, from the latest global data on the prevalence of human traffickin­g to reports from grass-roots organisati­ons, all signs show that we have failed to reduce the number or severity of abuses.

Many different state and private institutio­ns who have a role to play in combatting human traffickin­g can do it more effectivel­y.

As employers, businesses need to comply with national labour legislatio­n. At the same time, law enforcemen­t officials, labour inspectors, immigratio­n and border officials all have a role in the protection and promotion of human rights.

There has been an increased focus on the role of businesses in perpetuati­ng human traffickin­g. Against the backdrop of a worldwide pursuit of ever-cheaper labour and reduced regulation, responsibl­e business was anticipate­d to be a force for change.

Drawing upon the sensationa­lism of “modern slavery”, calls for expanded auditing of supply chains and for corporate disclosure­s on sourcing have proliferat­ed. However, these voluntary initiative­s have not brought substantiv­e improvemen­t, but rather have avoided the changes to business models that could make a real difference — such as paying workers a living wage or expanding social protection.

Addressing traffickin­g more effectivel­y requires a clearer understand­ing of the underlying issues. Human traffickin­g is not the result of a few criminals who have managed to avoid prosecutio­n. It is a systemic problem, with roots in the violation of labour rights: unsafe workplaces, excessive working hours, lack of overtime pay, wage theft and lack of freedom of associatio­n.

Primarily, human traffickin­g is grounded in unfair labour, gender and class relations. Yet, anti-traffickin­g measures have failed to address the causes of vulnerabil­ity, particular­ly for women and girls in the informal labour sector. Justice demands criminal prosecutio­n of those who profit from traffickin­g. But this response has proved insufficie­nt to reduce the problem. Change must occur at a more fundamenta­l level.

Today is World Day Against Traffickin­g in Persons. It reminds us that there is still the need for a greater focus on protection of labour rights and ensuring decent working conditions to reduce vulnerabil­ity of workers to human traffickin­g.

Increasing labour rights protection for workers would enable us to move beyond reactive responses. This means bringing those employed precarious­ly in domestic work, agricultur­e, fishing, entertainm­ent, and other informal work under the full protection of labour laws.

It would also mean reducing discrimina­tory treatment towards the most vulnerable segments of the workforce, particular­ly women and migrant workers. At the same time, broadening the mandate and resources of labour inspectora­tes to enforce labour laws would help accessing workplaces at risk of human traffickin­g. There should also be efforts to strengthen social protection schemes so that all workers can benefit.

Reinforcin­g outreach and legal assistance to workers can also help victims to register complaints when they face abuses. Meanwhile, workers themselves should be empowered to tackle this problem. That means the role of trade unions in combatting human traffickin­g should be promoted, while all workers should be ensured they have the right to organise and bargain collective­ly for better working conditions and wages.

In 2014, the Internatio­nal Labour Organisati­on adopted a new internatio­nal labour standard against forced labour. It emphasises the link between forced labour and traffickin­g in persons and establishe­s the obligation­s on three main levels: protection, prevention and compensati­on. The tools are here to combat human traffickin­g effectivel­y and uphold our commitment. The question is whether we have the courage to make use of them.

Tomoko Nishimoto is the regional director for the Internatio­nal Labour Organisati­on in Asia and the Pacific.

Anti-traffickin­g measures put in place have failed to address the causes of vulnerabil­ity.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand