Bangkok Post

Iran seeks to reclaim frozen assets

Claims Washington broke ‘Treaty of Amity’

-

THE HAGUE: The United States confronted Tehran at the UN’s top court on Monday over billions in frozen assets, in a case that could deepen the Trump administra­tion’s rift with internatio­nal justice.

Iran had dragged Washington before the Internatio­nal Court of Justice in June 2016 to oppose a US Supreme Court ruling that the US$2 billion should go to victims of terror attacks blamed on the Islamic republic.

Monday’s hearing of US objections against Iran’s appeal comes a week after the ICJ in a separate case ordered the US to ease sanctions reimposed after President Donald Trump pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran.

Both the assets and the sanctions cases are based on a 1955 “Treaty of Amity” between Washington and Tehran that predates Iran’s Islamic revolution.

Last Wednesday the Trump administra­tion announced it was not only tearing up the 1955 treaty but also that it was quitting the internatio­nal accord relating to the UN top court’s jurisdicti­on.

It remained unclear how Washington will respond to the latest case before the court.

The ICJ was set up after World War II to rule on disputes between United Nations member states. Its rulings are binding but it has no power to enforce them.

At Monday’s hearing a 15-judge bench listened to arguments by Washington’s lawyers over whether the ICJ can take up the case under its strict rules governing its procedure.

The US Supreme Court ruled in April 2016 that US$2 billion in Iran’s frozen assets must go to American victims of terror attacks.

These included the 1983 bombing of a US Marine barracks in Beirut in which 241 soldiers were killed and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia. In total the decision affects more than 1,000 Americans.

Iran angrily accused Washington of breaking the 1955 treaty — even though it was signed at the time with the pro-US regime of the Shah — and called for the US “to make full reparation­s to Iran for the violation of its internatio­nal legal obligation­s”.

Tehran said that because the US has maintained its designatio­n of Iran as a major state sponsor of terrorism, its assets including the Central Bank also known as the Bank Markazi, have been “subjected to enforcemen­t proceeding­s in the US” even if they should benefit from immunity under the 1955 treaty.

In response, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the US was terminatin­g the 1955 friendship treaty.

But Mr Trump’s national security advisor John Bolton also announced that the US was pulling out of the 1961 Optional Protocol and Dispute Resolution of the Vienna Convention.

The protocol establishe­s the ICJ as the “compulsory jurisdicti­on” for disputes unless nations decide to settle them elsewhere.

Mr Trump last month at the UN also virulently rejected the authority of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court over a probe into the actions of US forces in Afghanista­n.

 ?? AP ?? The US delegation, left, and that of the Islamic Republic of Iran rise as judges enter the Internatio­nal Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherland­s.
AP The US delegation, left, and that of the Islamic Republic of Iran rise as judges enter the Internatio­nal Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherland­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand