Bangkok Post

Economics is changing with time and trends

- Noah Smith ©2019 BLOOMBERG OPINION Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.

The 2010s began with a financial crisis and deep recession in developed countries and ended with social unrest and the spread of authoritar­ian populism. The field of economics was far from immune to the upheaval. Here are a few of the ways the field changed in the past decade:

THE CREDIBILIT­Y REVOLUTION

In the 1990s, economics started becoming more empirical. But there was always the danger that it would devolve into lazy correlatio­n studies and dubious methodolog­y. The response to this worry was called the credibilit­y revolution. Starting in the late 2000s, empirical economics began to rely much more on quasi-experiment­al methods, which either study the effects of random variations in economic conditions, test the results of policy experiment­s or set up controlled trials. The recent Nobel awarded to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer for their work on randomised controlled trials seems to validate the shift. The new approaches aren’t without their own challenges and limitation­s, but they promise to make economics much more scientific.

SHIFT TO THE LEFT

In the 1970s and 80s, libertaria­n economists such as Milton Friedman commanded the limelight and dominated the policy conversati­on, while conservati­ve supply-siders filled Washington’s thinktanks. But in the 2010s, a number of left-leaning economists became the public face of the discipline. Chief among these was the Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, who called relentless­ly for more fiscal stimulus and eviscerate­d Republican policy ideas. Thomas Piketty became a bestseller with his book “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”; together with frequent co-authors Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman he has raised awareness of inequality and proposed sweeping new taxes. Meanwhile, the group Economists for Inclusive Prosperity has gathered an entire army of left-leaning academic stars and their ideas are making their way into the policy proposals of US Democratic presidenti­al candidates.

FIGHT AGAINST SEXISM

The pervasive sexism in the economics profession has long been an open secret. But in the 2010s the problem began to get the attention it deserved. A series of research papers showed how female economists suffer discrimina­tion in publishing and tenure decisions and harassment online. The revelation­s sparked a major push for change. The American Economic Associatio­n has taken official steps to create a more welcoming environmen­t for women in the profession and culture and awareness are shifting within many academic department­s.

WARMING TO MINIMUM WAGE

The basic theory of supply and demand says that minimum wage increases kill jobs. But a huge flood of new evidence in recent years has shown little or no negative effects. Research is also suggesting that concentrat­ed corporate market power is a reason the real world doesn’t work like the simple theories in introducto­ry textbooks. Although US economists are still pretty evenly split on the question of a US$15 (455 baht) national minimum wage, the debate has definitely shifted in favour of the policy.

WARNING ABOUT MONOPOLIES

As mega-mergers become more common, gigantic companies are taking over industry after industry. Economists are warning that this could be leading to low productivi­ty growth, higher consumer prices and greater inequality as profits suck up a rising share of national income. The jury is still out about whether technology or lax regulation is the root cause of the trend, and what policy makers’ response should be.

HERESY ON TRADE

Previously, unfettered free trade was the one thing economists could agree on. But growing literature suggests that China’s entry into the World Trade Organisati­on had dire consequenc­es for the US workforce. Meanwhile, amid the success of China and other manufactur­ing-oriented developing countries, more economists are turning back to the idea that industrial policy can be a good tool for poor countries to get rich.

DIMINISHED CLOUT OF ECONOMICS

It’s a sad coincidenc­e that just as economics is improving in so many ways, its public influence is on the wane. But the financial crisis and the devastatin­g recession that followed discredite­d the discipline in the eyes of the public. Meanwhile, decades of rising inequality and stagnating mobility has made economists the targets of ire and scorn just as the field has become substantia­lly more progressiv­e. On the right, President Donald Trump has thrown’ advice out the window, promoting political sympathise­rs over serious scholars and launching an ill-advised trade war. Economists are still doing good work, but their influence in the halls of power may take decades to recover.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand