UK court rules against 3rd Heathrow runway

LONDON: The expansion of Heathrow Airport was declared unlawful by an appeal court judge yesterday, a major setback for the $18 billion project that could prompt the British government to pull its support for a third runway.

The new runway was approved by the government in 2018, but British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has previously opposed expanding Heathrow, Britain and Europe’s busiest airport.

During last year’s election campaign, Johnson said he would have to find some way of honouring an old promise to lie down in front of bulldozers at Heathrow to halt the expansion plans.

The judge said yesterday that the government had not sought permission to appeal the ruling in the supreme court, meaning that it will now have to rework the policy if it wants it to go ahead.

Heathrow Airport said, however, that it would appeal to the Supreme Court, and that recent commitments made by the aviation industry on meeting carbon commitments by 2050 were in with the Paris Agreement.

In his ruling, the judge said that in its current form the government’s policy was unlawful as it failed to take into account climate change commitments made by the government when it signed up to the Paris Agreement in 2015.

The airport’s two runways are operating at full capacity meaning that it cannot add new flights to drive exports and trade links. In two years, Heathrow be overtaken as the busiest airport in Europe by Paris, whose Charles de Gaulle hub has four runways.

Under the £14 billion ($18.2 billion) plan, Heathrow’s new runway would open in 2028.