Bangkok Post

Apple wins major tax fight against EU

- ALEX PIGMAN

BRUSSELS: A European court yesterday annulled an EU order that Apple Inc repay Ireland €13 billion ($15 billion) in back taxes, in a major legal setback for Brussels.

The iPhone-maker and Ireland had appealed the 2016 order that Apple CEO Tim Cook had slammed at the time as “total political crap”.

The unambiguou­s decision by the EU’s general court will be open to a further appeal at the top European Court of Justice no earlier than 2021.

The commission’s historic ruling against Apple was delivered in August 2016 by Competitio­n Commission­er Margrethe Vestager in a shock decision that put Europe on the map as a scourge of Silicon Valley.

Vestager was derided as “tax lady” by US President Donald Trump because of the Apple case as well as the heavy antitrust fines she imposed on Google.

The EU accused Ireland of allowing Apple to park revenue earned in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and India and sparing it almost any taxation.

Brussels said this gave Apple an advantage over other companies, allowing it to avoid Irish taxes between 2003 and 2014 of around €13 billion.

EU officials argued that constitute­d illegal “state aid” by Ireland.

But the EU court said the commission “did not succeed in showing the requisite legal standard that there was an advantage” as required by EU law.

The commission “was wrong” to declare that Apple units based in Ireland “had been granted a selective economic advantage and, by extension, state aid.”

Apple welcomed the decision and reiterated that the profits in question were always intended to go to the United States and not Ireland.

“This case was not about how much tax we pay, but where we are required to pay it,” an Apple spokesman said in an e-mail to AFP. “We’re proud to be the largest taxpayer in the world as we know the important role tax payments play in society.” Dublin also hailed the decision. The government said it had “always been clear” Apple received no special treatment, adding: “The correct amount of Irish tax was charged... in line with normal Irish taxation rules.”

Some observers have expressed doubts on the Apple case, wondering whether the EU was using antitrust law to crack down on tax optimisati­on strategies by multinatio­nals.

In similar cases, the same EU court struck down an order by Brussels that Starbucks Corp pay €30 million in back taxes to the Netherland­s.

In a separate decision, however, it said Fiat Chrysler Automobile­s NV must pay roughly the same amount to Luxembourg.

The case comes as the EU is trying to come up with ways to better ensnare digital giants to pay taxes where they do business, though this has been opposed by some European capitals.

“Today’s court decision illustrate­s how difficult it is to use EU state aid rules to collect tax,” said Tove Ryding, tax expert at the European Network on Debt and Developmen­t.

“If we had a proper corporate tax system, we wouldn’t need long court cases to find out whether it is legal for multinatio­nal corporatio­ns to pay less than one percent in taxes,” she said.

The Apple decision came on the eve of another landmark case at the EU courts, this one a lawsuit brought by an Austrian activist against Facebook Inc over data privacy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand