Bangkok Post

Are we on the eve of destructio­n?

- SIPPAKORN CHONGCHUWA­NICH

What we cannot prepare for, we must prevent. Nuclear weapons are among humanity’s darkest and most inhumane arsenal of war. It is high time, then, 75 years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to look back and acknowledg­e the incalculab­le human impact of this dangerous instrument of destructio­n.

The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused suffering and devastatio­n never seen before. So much so that humanity continues to live in the shadow of this traumatisi­ng memory to this very day. 75 years ago, on Aug 6 1945, a new type of weapon exploded above the city of Hiroshima. Within a fraction of a second, a massive dome of fire filled the sky. The intense heat of the explosion eclipsed the centre of the city, immediatel­y vaporising all living things. A millisecon­d later, a violent supersonic blast wave expanded outwards from the fireball in all directions, destroying most of the city and its 340,000 inhabitant­s. Three days later, this new weapon was once again unleashed upon Nagasaki, resulting in death and injury of 60% of the city’s population.

It would later come to light that the explosion had instantly killed tens of thousands of people and inflicted unspeakabl­e suffering upon many others. A few weeks later, Fritz Bilfinger, a delegate of the Internatio­nal Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), arrived in Hiroshima to assess the damage. The telegram he sent back to his colleagues painted a chilling picture: “City wiped out; 80% of all hospitals destroyed or seriously damaged; inspected two emergency hospitals, conditions beyond descriptio­n, full stop; effects of bomb mysterious­ly serious, stop.”

The unspeakabl­e suffering and devastatio­n witnessed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, led the ICRC and the wider Internatio­nal Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to conclude that this inhumane and indiscrimi­nate weapon must never be used again.

In the following decades, however, the stockpilin­g of nuclear weapons continued. After 75 years, there are still nearly 14,000 nuclear weapons in the world, thousands of which are ready to be launched at a moment’s notice. Many states are now intensifyi­ng their efforts to develop faster, “more precise” and “more useable” nuclear weapons.

Meanwhile, nuclear weapons are given an increasing­ly prevalent role in security policies and military doctrines. Furthermor­e, the UN secretary-general has warned that “The Cold War is back … but with a difference. The mechanisms and safeguards to manage the risks of escalation that existed in the past no longer seems to be present.” These developmen­ts contribute to a further deteriorat­ion of an already hostile internatio­nal security environmen­t.

The use of even a fraction of these weapons would cause mass suffering and destructio­n on an unimaginab­le scale. Recent research by the ICRC and UN agencies shows that no government or internatio­nal organisati­on has the capacity to respond to the colossal humanitari­an needs that would follow a nuclear detonation. Who, then, will assist the victims of a nuclear explosion, and how?

Our inability to answer this question makes it clear that prevention is the only responsibl­e course of action. We know that even a limited use of nuclear weapons would have long-term and irreversib­le effects on human health, the environmen­t, the climate and food-production — that is, on everything that life depends — threatenin­g future generation­s and the very survival of humanity. What can we do, then? To this, we say: What we cannot prepare for, we must prevent.

The first step is to recognise nuclear weapons for what they are: weapons of war with unacceptab­le humanitari­an consequenc­es. Military objectives can never justify using inhumane or indiscrimi­nate weapons. These considerat­ions led the ICRC and the wider Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement to conclude it is difficult to envisage any use of nuclear weapons that would be compatible with the principles of internatio­nal humanitari­an law (IHL) and to call for their prohibitio­n in 2011.

Throughout history, the internatio­nal community has taken steps to prohibit and eliminate weapons that have unacceptab­le humanitari­an consequenc­es. In 2017, States responded to the evidence of the immense suffering that would result from any use of nuclear weapons by adopting the landmark Treaty on the Prohibitio­n of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

Thailand is party to all major treaties related to nuclear weapons, such as the Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT), the Treaty on the Non-Proliferat­ion of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), along with the TPNW. In addition, Thailand is also a party to the Bangkok Treaty of 1995, which establishe­s Southeast Asia as a nuclear-weapon-free zone. All countries of Asean are party to the Bangkok Treaty. Thailand remains engaged in efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons and has called on states to endorse similar positions.

Speaking at the 50th Anniversar­y of the Treaty of Tlatelolco Internatio­nal Seminar, Thani Thongphakd­i, ambassador and permanent representa­tive of Thailand to the United Nations and Other Internatio­nal Organisati­ons in Geneva and chair of the 2016 Openended working group (OEWG), outlined the objective of multilater­al nuclear disarmamen­t negotiatio­ns:

“Looking ahead, we do not yet know what shape or form this legal instrument will take. I wish to reiterate though what most participat­ing countries called for ... is “a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total eliminatio­n, which would establish general prohibitio­ns and obligation­s as well as a political commitment to achieve and maintain a nuclear-weapon-free world.”

A nuclear-weapon-free world. A promise to ourselves and those that will come after us. A promise that we will no longer allow such power for devastatio­n to be used ever again. It is fitting, then 75 years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that we now honour the memory of the victims and take action to eliminate the use of nuclear weapons. Cognisant of our inability to respond to the consequenc­es of a nuclear explosion, any risk of use of nuclear weapons is unacceptab­le. To this, we say, once again: What we cannot prepare for, we must prevent.

‘‘

The intense heat eclipsed the centre of the city, immediatel­y vaporising all living things.

Sippakorn Chongchuwa­nich is a legal adviser at the Internatio­nal Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Bangkok Regional Delegation.

 ?? PICTURES COURTESY OF THE INTERNATIO­NAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS (ICRC) ?? A majestic building in the city of Hiroshima, before and after a massive bomb that devastated the city in 1945. It is later known as the Atomic Bomb Dome or Genbaku Dome.
PICTURES COURTESY OF THE INTERNATIO­NAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS (ICRC) A majestic building in the city of Hiroshima, before and after a massive bomb that devastated the city in 1945. It is later known as the Atomic Bomb Dome or Genbaku Dome.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand