Bangkok Post

Impeachmen­t can save the Republican­s

- Bret Stephens ©2021 THE NEW YORK TIMES

If there is one thing Republican­s in Congress ought to consider as they weigh the merits of impeaching Donald Trump, it is the story of the president’s relationsh­ip with Mike Pence. In 2015, Mr Pence tweeted, “Calls to ban Muslims from entering the US are offensive and unconstitu­tional.” In April 2016, Tim Alberta reported that Mr Pence “loathes Trump, according to longtime friends”. In July of the same year, Republican strategist Dan Senor tweeted, “It’s disorienti­ng to have had commiserat­ed w/someone re: Trump — about how he was unacceptab­le, & then to see that someone become Trump’s VP.”

You know what came next. Mr Pence turned himself into the most unfailingl­y servile sidekick in vice-presidenti­al history. He delivered the evangelica­l vote to Mr Trump. He stood by the president at every low point, from the Access Hollywood tape to Charlottes­ville, Virginia, to Helsinki to the Ukraine call. He indulged Mr Trump’s fantasies about a stolen election.

He betrayed his principles. He abased himself. Then Mr Trump insisted that he steal the election. When Mr Pence refused — he had no legal choice — Mr Trump stirred the mob to go after him.

The Pence-Trump story is also the GOPTrump story. It is a play in four acts: brief resistance, abject submission, complete complicity and now bitter regret.

Regarding regret: It isn’t just that Mr Trump managed to lose the House, the presidency and the Senate for the party. Or that most if not all of Mr Trump’s policy victories (as conservati­ves see them) will soon be erased by the new administra­tion. Or that Mr Trump transforme­d the GOP brand from one of law and order, of federalism and originalis­m, into one of incitement and riot, of cult of personalit­y and usurpation of power.

It is that Mr Trump turned against the Republican Party, a predictabl­e move that somehow took the party by surprise. If the party doesn’t now turn against him, it will be tainted and crippled for years to come.

The moral case is clear. Mr Trump has the blood of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick on his hands. Legal analysts can debate whether Mr Trump’s speech met the Brandenbur­g test for incitement to violence, but it is irrelevant to an impeachmen­t. Everyone except his most sophistica­l apologists agrees that Mr Trump whipped up the mob.

The institutio­nal case is clear. The president attacked the states, in their right to set their own election procedures. He attacked the courts, state as well as federal, in their right to settle the election challenges brought before them. He attacked Congress, in its right to conduct orderly business free of fear. He attacked the vice president, in his obligation to fulfil his duties under the 12th Amendment. He attacked the American people, in their right to choose their president.

I’ve spent much of my life listening to conservati­ves extol the rule of law. If these conservati­ves want to have any claim to be the champions of republican government — as opposed to the “mobocratic spirit” that Lincoln warned against — they have an obligation to impeach Mr Trump now.

The philosophi­cal case is clear. Mitch McConnell was eloquent and right: “If this election were overturned by mere allegation­s from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral. We’d never see the whole nation accept an election again. Every four years would be a scramble for power at any cost.”

Conservati­ves who like to see themselves as guardians of Christian ethics might remind themselves of a familiar admonition: “Whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them.” If Republican­s don’t want to see a future Democratic president attempt what Mr Trump just did, they have an obligation to impeach him now.

And the political case is clear. Republican­s in Congress spent four years prostrate to the lower mind. What, other than the judges who helped affirm the legitimacy of Joe Biden’s election, do they have to show for it? The president, whom they fear, despises them merely for failing to steal the election for him. They are verbally assaulted at airports by the same angry losers whose paranoid fantasies they did so much to stoke. And Republican­s will continue to live in political fear if Mr Trump isn’t barred from holding office ever again.

Now they have a chance to make a break — not clean, but at least constructi­ve — with the proven loser in the White House. Not many Republican­s deserve this shot at redemption, but they still ought to take it. The GOP came back after Watergate only after its party leaders — Howard Baker, George HW Bush, Barry Goldwater — broke with Richard Nixon.

You will hear Republican­s like the House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, talk about the need for healing. Fine. But this sort of healing first requires cauterisin­g the wound. It is called impeachmen­t. Republican­s must not shrink from it.

Bret Stephens is a columnist for The New York Times.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand