It’s time to press pause on the Tokyo Olympics

Stop the Olympics. It’s time to press pause and re-imagine them. Maybe even give them up for good. When I wrote that in April and asked for suggestions on how to fix the games, readers responded in droves with ideas for how the Olympics could evolve to remain relevant and, yes, morally defensible in future years.

It did not take long for a consensus to emerge. Readers questioned the ethics of holding the Tokyo Games during a summer in which Japan is still grappling hard with the coronavirus pandemic.

They lamented the long Olympic history of bloated budgets, the doping and bribery scandals, the forced removal of residents in host cities to make way for vast new venues, the decision to award the games to countries with autocratic governments and shoddy human rights histories like Russia and China.

Still, give the Olympics up for good? That idea didn’t fly. But most readers were not happy with the notion of a future that keeps the status quo.

“When it gets down to it, removing all the trouble, the games are a celebration of humanity and can be a tremendous force for good,” said Dick Roth of Park City, Utah. He should know. Now 73, Roth won a swimming gold medal for the United States during the last Tokyo Summer Olympics, in 1964.

When I reached him by phone last week, Roth spoke of the connections he made with swimmers from Russia and Japan and of a sense of humanity that he believes has energised his life ever since.

But he was also clear-eyed about the fact that time had altered everything, not for the better, and that now the Olympic movement must drastically alter its course.

His solution? Start at the top, with the Switzerland-based International Olympic Committee (IOC), which lords over the games with an amazing tone deafness.

“The IOC from its very beginning comes from the culture of the upper classes in Europe,” Roth said. “They are so out of touch. They need to realise it’s not all about the money, not all about the galas. It’s about the athletes. The competition. That’s what is getting lost.”

It’s not just former athletes who know something is amiss. Carrie Davis, 42, a Spanish teacher in Denver.

These days, though, she worries that the games are causing more harm than good.

“Let’s face it, the Olympics need some serious changes right now,” she said.

No more Olympics hosts with terrible human rights records. No more excess driven by the insatiable desire for shimmering new venues at every stop. The Tokyo Games will cost about $15.4 billion (495 billion baht), more than any other Summer Olympics.

“Nothing that is simply going to benefit rich people and hurt the poor,” Davis said. “Use what’s already in existence, and that’s it. Nothing more.”

I was heartened to hear a significant groundswell of support for an Olympics that smashes the single-city model. Spreading out the games could decrease corruption in the bidding process. It could even curtail the power of the IOC to hold a single city or country captive to its whims.

“Decentralise the games, absolutely,” said George Hirsch, the chairman of the board of New York Road Runners, the organisation that oversees the New York Marathon.

“We would strip down these enormous costs and commercialism of the games,” he said. “I put all of this in the category of putting the games back on a human scale. ”

I didn’t hear much defence of the IOC. To wit, the continuing efforts to control athlete protests at the games. In the Olympic movement, the athletes are mere pawns.

Yes, we can alter the way the games look. But unless the IOC is completely revamped, what will truly change about the entire undertaking?

Plenty of Japanese residents would undoubtedly agree. As polls show that a majority of them do not want the games to go on this summer.

“People are resigned to the idea that the Olympics are going to go ahead, but people are disgusted and also afraid,” said Koichi Nakano, who teaches political science at Sophia University in Tokyo.

He said the IOC was creating that fear. The Japanese people, Nakano said, believe that the games would be reconsidered more seriously if the host city were London or Paris and the local residents were objecting as strenuously.

“So, we have this sense,” he said, “of an unaccountable, European, snobbish group of people looking down upon Japan.”

“The Tokyo Games,” he added, “need to be cancelled”.

Nakano was right. Not that the Olympic overlords will listen. When have they ever done that?