Bangkok Post

ECONOMIC CYCLONE ALERT

From Pakistan to the Maldives, foreign-exchange and debt risks grow across South Asia as inflationa­ry headwinds build. By Karan Mehrishi in Mumbai

-

For over a decade, Mattias Martinsson has been investing in frontier economies, including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Now, he says, South Asia is “in the eye of the storm”.

“The next couple of months will be painful for the South Asian markets,” predicted Martinsson, chief investment officer at the US$220 million Swedish fund Tundra Fonder. “There is a high possibilit­y that we will see both inflation and interest rates rising and currencies depreciati­ng.”

Sri Lanka’s rapid descent into the economic abyss has shocked the world. As the country’s accessible foreign reserves dwindled to next to nothing and citizens suffered under acute shortages of fuel, food and medicine, the government last month “preemptive­ly” defaulted on its internatio­nal debt for the first time.

But while the Indian Ocean island is the most desperate country, it is not alone. From the beaches of the Maldives and the mountains of Nepal to the bustling streets of Pakistan, much of South Asia faces similar risks from shrinking foreign-exchange coffers and surging global inflation.

While countries around the world are feeling similar headwinds, South Asia is home to a particular­ly vulnerable cluster.

South Asian nations have also run up relatively hefty foreign debt, including significan­t amounts to China, which has courted them under what Indian and American foreign policy wonks refer to as the “string of pearls” strategy.

Over the years, Beijing pumped in cheap loans in exchange for strategic assets through long-term leasing programmes, giving itself a strategic hedge against India. Sri Lanka owes an estimated 10% of its debt to China, while the figure for Pakistan has been reported at 27.4%.

As the pressure builds, countries are eyeing escape routes.

The woes stem partly from factors beyond the control of government­s, experts say. First, Covid-19 severely strained public finances. Then rising commodity prices amid the Ukraine war slammed South Asian countries that are net importers.

‘THE FIRST DOMINO’

Rohan Gunaratna, a leading South Asian scholar who has written several books on Sri Lanka, described the country as the “first domino to fall”, adding that its “weak economy was crippled by the loss of tourism, loss of foreign workers’ remittance­s and rising energy prices”. Sri Lanka’s inflation rate for May hit a record 39.1%, its statistics office said recently.

But observers also say Sri Lanka lacked foresight. After President Gotabaya Rajapaksa won the 2019 election, Martinsson said that “the new government’s idea was to stimulate the country out of the debt trap by lowering taxes. It could have worked, but when Covid hit Sri Lanka’s tourism revenue was impacted, along with its ability to service its foreign debt”.

Rather than negotiatin­g with foreign lenders and the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund early on, Sri Lanka continued to pay as its reserves evaporated.

“They did not want to go to [the IMF] because this would require stringent fiscal discipline,” Martinsson said. “Instead, they took a bet on the tourism industry recovering in time.”

That did not happen. Panicked officials resorted to capital controls, limiting the withdrawal of foreign currency by citizens, companies and foreign investors, further discouragi­ng outside investors.

Making matters worse, the government banned fertiliser imports last year in an ill-fated attempt to conserve foreign currency. Partly as a result, the country’s vital tea exports hit their lowest level in more than two decades in the first quarter of this year, according to reports.

In April, Sri Lanka’s usable liquid reserves were said to be just $50 million, enough for only a few days’ worth of imports. “It is one of the worst crisis examples of management that I’ve seen, if not the worst,” Martinsson said. “I can’t explain it as anything else but a gamble, which they lost.”

UNEASE IN ISLAMABAD

Pakistan is another economy on the precipice.

While conditions are not as dire as in Sri Lanka, Pakistan’s total foreign reserves plunged to $16.4 billion at the end of April, down from $24 billion last fall, according to the State Bank of Pakistan. Its ratio of external debt to gross domestic product stood at nearly 35% as of the beginning of the year, versus Sri Lanka’s 58%.

“Sri Lanka and Pakistan are stressed due to high external debt to GDP levels, plus current-account deficits, caused by too much previous optimism [and] borrowing,” said Mike Gallagher, research director at Continuum Economics, a macroecono­mic research specialist that counts BlackRock and the IMF as clients.

“Now their central banks are faced with a crisis at the worst possible time — when the [dollar] is strong and the Fed is pushing interest rates to 2.5% to 3.0%.”

Tightening by the US Federal Reserve affects emerging markets by increasing their debt burdens and sucking capital out of their economies.

Like Sri Lanka, where protesters have raged against Rajapaksa, Pakistan has been rocked by political instabilit­y. Former prime minister Imran Khan’s government was ousted in a no-confidence vote in April, prompting massive protests. The new government of Shehbaz Sharif is attempting to right the economic ship, starting with an unpopular decision to [slash fuel subsidies] in a push to unlock IMF funding.

Analysts again blame a lack of foresight.

“It is tempting to try and lay blame for Pakistan’s current economic situation on any one government’s policies,” said Asim Ijaz Khwaja, director at the Center for Internatio­nal Developmen­t at Harvard University and co-founder of the Centre for Economic Research in Pakistan.

“The reality is that our situation has been decades in the making and reflects, sadly, a set of poor choices and systematic­ally inadequate policy formulatio­n and refinement processes. At its essence, the problem is one of lack of long-term planning and no focus on productivi­ty.”

Sharif, under intense pressure to call fresh elections, presented a new budget earlier this month that he hoped would demonstrat­e that his administra­tion is on the right track. The 9.5-trillion-rupee ($47 billion) budget for fiscal 2022-23 promises tight fiscal consolidat­ion in a bid to convince the IMF to restart much-needed bailout payments.

But the IMF said additional measures would be needed to bring the budget in line with the key objectives of the bailout programme.

The IMF expressed concerns about the budget numbers, including fuel subsidies, a widening current account deficit and the need to raise more direct taxes.

However, Finance Minister Miftah Ismail said his government was confident they could adjust the budget to bring the IMF on board.

Usama Abid, chief investment and research officer at the Pakistani investment app YPay Financial Services, warned of possible further erosion of foreign reserves and political chaos ahead of the next polls, which are due by October 2023 at the latest.

“Reserves with Pakistan’s central bank need to go above 2.5 to three months’ worth of imports, as that’s the thermomete­r of confidence,” Abid told Nikkei Asia. The latest figures from the CEIC database showed just 1.6 months’ worth as of March.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s central bank in May raised its key interest rate by 150 basis points to 13.75%, aiming to contain inflation that hit 13.8% the same month. Abid said that if the policy rate moves to 15%, it will be “painful” for the stock market and banks with heavy exposure to longer maturities.

Then there is neighbouri­ng India, the world’s sixth-largest economy. It, too, is feeling the impact of inflation, with retail prices rising nearly 7.8% on the year in April. The country’s foreign reserves shrank for nine straight weeks until mid-May, according to local media, though observers say the total of around $600 billion is adequate. The central bank has raised rates by 90 basis points so far this year to tame prices that have run above its 6% tolerance limit.

TROUBLE IN PARADISE

Also on the radar is the Maldives, where there was concern about a $250-million bond due this month. The finance minister insisted to local media that there was no risk of default. The US investment bank JPMorgan, however, included the tourist haven on a list of countries at risk of defaulting by the end of 2023.

Total debt to GDP in the Maldives exceeds 100%, with the ratio of external debt at nearly 67% in January — a heavy load for its fragile economy. The Bahamas, another tourism-driven island state on JPMorgan’s watch list, had an external debt ratio of 36.5% according to the data provider Macrobond.

“The Maldives is highly vulnerable to external and macroecono­mic shocks due to its dependence on tourism and limited sectoral diversific­ation,” said Faris Hadad-Zervos, country director at the World Bank, which warned in April that the Ukraine war risked pushing up the Maldives’ fuel bills and fiscal burden.

“The fiscal deficit and debt-to-GDP ratio are both expected to remain high. Therefore, more prudent debt management and investment planning remains critical to improve fiscal sustainabi­lity,” Hadad-Zervos said.

Nepal’s macroecono­mic stability is also under scrutiny. The government even suspended the central bank governor, reportedly for not doing enough to maintain reserves.

Gunakar Bhatta, executive director and spokespers­on at Nepal Rastra Bank, the central bank, argued that “Nepal’s public debt to GDP is a manageable 40%, and out of this only 950 billion Nepalese rupees ($7.6 billion) is held by internatio­nal institutio­ns, which are mainly multilater­als. There is no question of the country defaulting as Nepal currently has about 6.6 months’ worth of import coverage, provided by its forex reserves.”

Bhatta did concede that inflation and the adverse effects of the country’s trade deficit are threats, however.

An exception is Bangladesh. Inflation hit 6.3% in April, but the country has so far kept reserves and external debt at more sustainabl­e levels, thanks to some tough decisions. Dhaka did not opt for aggressive Covid lockdowns, helping to maintain tax revenue.

It has also refrained from intervenin­g extensivel­y in the open market to prop up its currency, saving funds for a rainy day, while carefully managing its fiscal deficit and current-account balance.

Essentiall­y, Bangladesh made a macroecono­mic trade-off.

“With current challenges of high inflation, and subsequent policies of narrowing down fiscal expenditur­es and undertakin­g tight monetary approaches, recovery would be slower than expected,” explained Monzur Hossain, research director at the government-backed Bangladesh Institute of Developmen­t Studies. But for the sake of macroecono­mic stability, he said, “GDP growth may be compromise­d”. Still, there are no easy answers. To save foreign currency, several countries have restricted imports of luxuries and nonessenti­al goods. Back in March 2020, Sri Lanka prohibited imports ranging from vehicles and air conditione­rs to beer. This had little effect.

“I can’t explain (Sri Lanka’s economic strategy) as anything else but a gamble, which they lost”

MATTIAS MARTINSSON Frontier market investor

CHINA CONNECTION

The China connection is also a complicati­on. In Sri Lanka’s case, Beijing has reportedly resisted taking a haircut on the debt. Natixis Asia Research recently suggested that “this is due to China’s role as the largest creditor to the emerging and developing countries”.

It pointed out that China accounts for almost one-quarter of their external debt based on World Bank estimates, and that it is likely reluctant to set a precedent “for other distressed debtors”.

Most analysts do not anticipate a repeat of the 1997-98 crisis that swept Southeast Asia. But to avoid becoming the next domino to fall, Continuum’s Gallagher prescribed for frontier economies a carefully handled combinatio­n of interest-rate increases, some currency depreciati­on to help exports, prudent use of remaining forex reserves and IMF support. Sri Lanka is seeking a multibilli­on-dollar bailout from the IMF.

To an extent, South Asian economies will also remain at the mercy of the Fed. Dwijendra Srivastava, chief investment officer for debt at Sundaram Mutual Fund — one of South Asia’s largest with over $7 billion under management — called US tightening “the biggest threat”, along with geopolitic­s elevating energy and food prices.

Gallagher agreed. “If the Fed becomes restrictiv­e, then a risk exists that others could follow the current preemptive default in Sri Lanka,” he said.

As they scramble to avoid that fate, these economies could strive for greater diversific­ation over the long term. The scholar Gunaratna stressed they need a sharper eye for trouble.

“To mitigate against future global shocks,” he said, “South Asian government­s must develop capabiliti­es in both foresight and intelligen­ce to anticipate and prevent crises.”

 ?? Source: Macrobond BANGKOK POST GRAPHICS ??
Source: Macrobond BANGKOK POST GRAPHICS
 ?? ?? Workers load goods onto a cargo vessel in the Buriganga River in Dhaka. Bangladesh has made some tough decisions that essentiall­y ensure economic stability but at the expense of growth.
Workers load goods onto a cargo vessel in the Buriganga River in Dhaka. Bangladesh has made some tough decisions that essentiall­y ensure economic stability but at the expense of growth.
 ?? ?? Like much of South Asia, the tourist-dependent Maldives faces growing economic pressure, but its finance minister has played down talk of a debt default.
Like much of South Asia, the tourist-dependent Maldives faces growing economic pressure, but its finance minister has played down talk of a debt default.
 ?? ?? From a Maldives bond payment to India’s central bank and Pakistan’s budget, economic strain in South Asia has been in focus.
From a Maldives bond payment to India’s central bank and Pakistan’s budget, economic strain in South Asia has been in focus.
 ?? BANGKOK POST GRAPHICS ?? Source: Macrobond
BANGKOK POST GRAPHICS Source: Macrobond
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand