WATCHING ‘THE CROWN’ WITH BRITAIN’S ANTI-ROYALS
There has been a rise in republican sentiment since the show’s 2016 debut. By Alex Marshall
On Monday evening, Finna Ayres and Matt Turnbull met in Ms Ayres’ London home to do something their friends would have found shocking: watch the latest season of The Crown, Netflix’s show about the ins and outs of Britain’s royal family. Ms Ayres, 80, a retired architect, and Mr Turnbull, 35, a brand strategist, are members of Republic, an organisation that wants to abolish Britain’s monarchy in favour of an elected head of state. Neither were fans of the show, but had agreed to watch the new season as an experiment.
The evening ahead was such a potentially unsettling experience that Mr Turnbull had brought two packs of beer with him. “If I’m going to sit through a hagiography for the royal family, I need to be lubricated,” he said.
Within minutes of the first episode, Dominic West, playing Prince Charles, appeared onscreen. “I do like him,” Ms Ayres said, before calling the actor “dishy”.
“I wish he hadn’t sullied his reputation by playing Prince Charles,” she added.
Ms Ayres and Mr Turnbull kept up similarly jokey commentary for the next half-hour, until they came to a scene in which Queen Elizabeth (Imelda Staunton) meets John Major (Jonny Lee Miller), Britain’s prime minister for most of the 1990s, and asks that the British taxpayer fund the refurbishing of her yacht.
As the scene unfurled, Mr Turnbull put his head in his hands, then started watching through his fingers. “Oh, God, I feel queasy,” he said.
As it began looking like Mr Major might accept the queen’s demand for financial assistance, Mr Turnbull said he felt angry.
“This is exactly how I imagine the royal family to be!” he said, adding that the royals cost Britons hundreds of millions of pounds a year. The show was “making my skin crawl”, he said. Not long after, he went to the kitchen to grab another beer.
Since The Crown debuted in 2016, there has been a steady increase in support in Britain for abolishing the monarchy and replacing the institution with an elected head of state — from 17% of the British public in 2016, to 22% this May, according to IPSOS, a polling company.
Pauline Maclaran, a professor at Royal Holloway, University of London, who has written a book on the monarchy, said anecdotal evidence suggested the show had altered some people’s perceptions of the royals.
The show’s early series portrayed Queen Elizabeth II — who died in September — as relatable, Dr Maclaran said, and many young people had told journalists that they warmed to her because of it.
But, Dr Maclaran said, the show’s portrayal of Charles has been more complicated — especially given his tumultuous relationship with his first wife, Diana — and that might have turned some people against him. The new series “couldn’t have come at a worse time” for the new King Charles III, Dr Maclaran added.
This season of the show has certainly fuelled concern in Britain about the accuracy of the portrayal of the royals.
Last month, Mr Major, the former prime minister, told the British newspaper The Mail on Sunday that the show was a “load of malicious nonsense” for implying that Charles had lobbied him to back the queen’s abdication.
Actor Judi Dench heightened that criticism by writing to The Times of London to say that the show’s fictionalised scenes were “cruelly unjust to the individuals and damaging to the institution they represent”.
Graham Smith, the CEO of Republic, said he felt the new series could be beneficial to his movement, especially when it portrays the royals as cold and out of touch.
His organisation now has 4,500 paying members, he said, and some of the newer members had told him that The Crown was the reason they joined. He said that complaints about the show’s accuracy were “special pleading” from royalists.
Mr Smith said that growing support for republicanism had more to do with recent scandals involving the monarchy, including accusations of sexual assault against Prince Andrew and the stormy exit from the royal family of Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan. Those events eroded respect for the institution, Mr Smith said.
The blanket media coverage of Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in September, Mr Smith added, has also made some people question why a death in one family was elevated above others. In the month of the queen’s funeral, donors gave Republic £70,000 (about 2.9 million baht), which Mr Smith called “a significant sum” for a relatively small organisation.
This season of The Crown is the first to feature plotlines that heavily question the monarchy’s existence, with Charles and others fretting about its relevance. The final episode even begins with a clip from a 1997 British television special, Monarchy: The Nation Decides, in which viewers called in to vote to keep or abolish the monarchy (some 2.6 million votes were registered with 34% of callers saying that they no longer wanted the queen to reign over them).
In the episode, Diana (Elizabeth Debicki) is shown repeatedly calling into the show herself to vote for the monarchy’s abolition. As Diana voted, Ms Ayres laughed. Yet Mr Turnbull seemed surprised.
“Did this really happen?” he said, referring to the televised phone vote. He hadn’t realised that 25 years ago, British TV was openly discussing whether the country should become a republic. Despite these pleasant surprises, asked if they would watch The Crown again, both had a simple answer: No.
Ms Ayres added, “I’ve better things to do”.