Bangkok Post

Blame it all on the voting machines

Brazil riots fit global pattern, write and

- Anuj Chopra, Luiza Queiroz Rossen Bossev

Mobs of rioters who stormed Brazil’s seats of power raised conspiracy-laden slogans against voting machines, a prime target of disinforma­tion campaigns seeking to undermine trust in electoral systems around the world.

Far-right ex-president Jair Bolsonaro’s supporters, who invaded the presidenti­al palace, Congress and Supreme Court in the capital Brasilia on Sunday, demanded access to the “source code” of electronic voting machines.

That slogan effectivel­y questioned the reliabilit­y of voting equipment after a bitterly contested election that saw Mr Bolsonaro defeated by his leftist rival Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

The right-wing rage was the latest illustrati­on of the impact of disinforma­tion campaigns that have sought to cast doubt on voting machines from the United States to France, Bulgaria and the Philippine­s.

“This scenario of rioting and insurrecti­on over baseless theories fuel;ed by technology opacity are very dangerous for the stability of global democracie­s,”

Gregory Miller, the co-founder of the nonpartisa­n nonprofit OSET Institute, told AFP.

Brazil has used voting machines in its elections since 1996, but they only recently became mired in controvers­y, with Mr Bolsonaro leading allegation­s that they were plagued by fraud.

No major security flaw has ever been detected, with political parties, the judiciary and the military allowed to inspect the source code and tests conducted by technology experts to protect against hacking.

The Brazilian riots bore chilling similariti­es to the insurrecti­on at the US Capitol on Jan 6, 2021 by supporters of former president Donald Trump, who claimed the 2020 election had been stolen from him.

Far-right campaigns falsely asserted that voting machines manipulate­d votes away from Mr Trump in 2020. Voting technology companies have filed a flurry of lawsuits against Trump allies and media outlets for false claims that they rigged the vote.

Still, ahead of the 2022 midterm elections in the United States, conspiracy-endorsing Republican politician­s amped up their rhetoric against the machines as two swing state counties moved to allow hand counting.

The contentiou­s push for hand counting came even though US experts warned that it is often less accurate than machine counting and prone to delays.

A 2018 study published in the Election Law Journal analysed two statewide recounts in Wisconsin, including the 2016 presidenti­al election. It found that “vote counts originally conducted by computeris­ed scanners were, on average, more accurate.”

But the rhetoric against the machines continued after the widely anticipate­d Republican “red wave” failed to materialis­e in the November midterms.

Citing the examples of the United States and Brazil, far-right French politician Florian Philippot tweeted earlier this week that electronic voting bred “doubt, fraud, chaos.”

His comments followed a series of online claims that bugs affecting electronic voting machines favoured Emmanuel Macron in the second round of the 2022 presidenti­al election, which he won.

The claims were widely dismissed by media watchdogs such as NewsGuard and AFP’s factchecke­rs debunked several false claims about the reliabilit­y of voting equipment in France.

But he still cast doubt on electronic voting.

“Let’s eliminate all machine voting in France,” the politician wrote on Twitter.

Similar distrust has been rampant in Bulgaria.

In 2021, Bulgaria’s parliament passed a law to introduce machine voting amid widespread suspicion of fraud with paper ballots.

However, paper ballots were returned the following year after sustained disinforma­tion campaigns eroded public trust in the machines.

Baseless theories fuelled by technology opacity are very dangerous for the stability of global democracie­s.

GREGORY MILLER OSET INSTITUTE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Thailand