Baldwin charges could be hard to prove
It’s a very aggressive charging decision, and the defence has a strong case. FORMER PROSECUTOR, NEAMA RAHMANI
>>Prosecutors could face long odds convincing a jury that Alec Baldwin is criminally liable for the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins during the filming of the Western Rust, according to several legal experts.
New Mexico District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies said on Thursday that her office will file involuntary manslaughter charges against the 30 Rock actor and the film’s armourer Hannah Gutierrez Reed following more than a year of investigation into the October 2021 shooting.
Baldwin, 64, has said he was told the gun did not contain live rounds when it was handed to him and that he did not pull the trigger. His attorney on Thursday called the decision to criminally charge the actor a “terrible miscarriage of justice”.
Legal experts said they were doubtful that a jury would convict Baldwin over the shooting, which occurred during a rehearsal on the set in October 2021, if the evidence shows the tragedy was an accident that occurred despite safety precautions in place to prevent it.
“It’s a very aggressive charging decision, and the defence has a strong case,” said personal injury attorney and former prosecutor Neama Rahmani, who is not involved in the Rust case.
The most serious charge prosecutors are pursuing — which carries five years in jail — would require them to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Baldwin was more than just negligent.
Legal experts said this would likely require proving his behaviour was reckless, or “an extreme departure from the care a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.”
In announcing the charges, Ms Carmack-Altwies said that “every person that handles a gun has a duty to make sure... that it is not going to fire a projectile and kill someone.”
But legal experts questioned whether that standard applies if on-set weapons experts told Baldwin the gun was safe.
They said that criminal charges are rare even in accidental shooting deaths that take place in non-professional settings without safety protocols.
Criminal liability is a stretch unless prosecutors “can show it was absolutely reckless in terms of the level of safety on set,” said defence lawyer and former New Mexico US attorney John Anderson, who is not involved in the case.
“Here it sounds like they had multiple safety checks built in,” Mr Anderson said.
Experts interviewed by Reuters could not cite another instance in which criminal charges stemmed from an accidental shooting death on a film set.
When Bruce Lee’s son, Brandon Lee, was fatally shot by an improperly inspected gun on the set of The Crow in 1993, prosecutors concluded it was an accident caused by negligence and declined to bring charges.
Andrea Reeb, the special prosecutor appointed in the Rust case, said “the evidence clearly shows a pattern of criminal disregard for safety on the Rust film set.”
New Mexico’s worker safety agency in April fined the film’s production company $137,000 (4,471,680 baht) for what they described as “wilful” safety lapses. And civil suits against Baldwin that are pending have claimed systemic cost-cutting led to dangerous conditions on set, allegations Baldwin and the film’s production company have denied.
But prosecutors would face a much higher burden in a criminal case and would likely need to demonstrate extraordinary safety lapses across the board, legal experts said.
Involuntary manslaughter charges are most common in fatal traffic accidents involving extreme recklessness, such as intoxication or excessive speeding, according to experts.
None of the publicly available information indicates Baldwin’s state of mind was reckless enough to meet that standard, said defence attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter.
“We don’t have all of the evidence, but it still feels like prosecutors face an uphill battle. It seems obvious that everyone involved thought they were just rehearsing a scene,” Ritter said.