Wonderstruck:A complex kids’ film
For many younger moviegoers, Wonderstruck will be their first Todd Haynes film. “Depends on what kind of parent you are,” Haynes chucked while sitting in a shady rooftop corner of the Cannes Film Festival’s hub, the Palais. The director’s other options aren’t quite kid-friendly. There was his transgressive cinema landmark Poison and his portrait of toxic suburbia Safe. The ‘70s glam rock drama Velvet Goldmine might catch a young one’s attention, but its surreal excesses certainly aren’t PG. And then there’s his remarkable string of period melodramas: Far From Heaven, the miniseries Mildred Pierce and his last film, the sumptuous, Oscarnominated romance Carol.
While Wonderstruck is chalk-full of Haynes’ touch, it’s an undeniable left-hand turn. It’s based on Brian Zelnick’s colourful young-adult book, which tells parallel stories of two runaway 12-yearolds, 50 years apart, who have fled their homes for New York. The 1927 section features a deaf girl seeking her mother; the 1977 half follows an orphaned boy (Oakes Fegley) from the Midwest.
Is it thrilling to make a film that will reach younger moviegoers you haven’t before?
That was really the motivation for wanting to do it. And to maintain an almost stubborn respect for the ability of kids to deal with something this unique and strange and oneof-a-kind that also unabashedly looks back in time, and that really honors the complexity, the peculiarity, the uniqueness of their experience.
And it does this kind of lovely paralleling with the theme of deafness, which I think speaks to a universal understanding that kids get that they have limited abilities and they understand limits of perception and mobility and freedom.
The movie The Miracle Worker was a favourite of mine when I was a kid. That movie is also very much about language and understanding what language means and how that frees us or connects us back to the world.
How were you even open to a project like this?
I like a maybe broader range of movies than people might expect. I didn’t really know Brian’s books that well before. I don’t have kids, but kids are all around me and my life. I have nephews I adore, and kids of friends.
But this wasn’t really on my radar but it came to me through Sandy Powell who became close to Brian Selznick after Hugo. She was the one who said, “I think this is a Todd Haynes movie.”
It was just so sweet and unexpected to get the script. When I started to look at the script and I saw how much of a cinematic take he had brought to the structuring of it so that it was really an editorial experience.
It’s quite a cinematic feast. There’s black-and-white, vibrant ‘70s colour, long periods without dialogue, a dream sequence and a striking section told with miniatures that recalls the dolls of your
It’s a film that really asks for that. I used all the tools in my toolbox and I used all the personnel and the creative partnerships in my family of filmmaking.
This movie, because of its theme of deafness, because of the silent film aspect, functions without dialogue for so much of the film that it’s a purely cinematic experience.
And it calls on a visual storytelling - certainly music and production design. I knew that I could immerse in the production and collect all the material, but I knew it was ultimately going to be about how we cut the movie.