Sarkozy phone-taps legal, court rules
ALLIES HAD BEEN CONFIDENT TAPS WOULD BE FOUND INADMISSIBLE, CLEARING THE WAY FOR POLITICAL COMEBACK
French magistrates ruled yesterday that authorities had acted legally in tapping ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy’s phone as part of an investigation into allegations of influence peddling, in a potential blow to his hopes to run for president in 2017.
Sarkozy allies had been confident the court would declare the taps inadmissible and clear the way for him to seek the conservatives’ ticket for the 2017 ballot without that judicial cloud hanging over him.
But magistrates approved the measure as part of investigation of the funding of Sarkozy’s successful 2007 election campaign.
Sarkozy compared the tapping last year to the mass surveillance of the Stasi secret police of former communist East Germany. He has denied any wrongdoing.
Corruption investigation
His lawyers said they would appeal against the decision, but that will not stop resumption of the investigation over allegations of corruption and influence peddling, a judicial source said.
The news came just three weeks before a key party congress and two days after the UMP leadership decided on a new name — “The Republicans”.
Some party supporters said the magistrates’ decision might be politically motivated.
“Nicolas Sarkozy has for a long time had a pack on his heels trying to make him stumble, but let’s stress that he has never been convicted,” party official Nadine Morano said on Twitter.
Sarkozy himself did not react to the court’s decision but aides said he was “unfazed and determined”.
Sarkozy, who lost the 2012 presidential election to Socialist Francois Hollande, had seen his return to politics at the end of last year challenged by party rivals before strengthening his hold on the party with local election victories in March.
But a string of judicial investigations also represent a threat.
Sarkozy was questioned by investigators a few weeks ago in a separate investigation over whether it was legal for his party to pay over 500,000 euros of fines he incurred for overspending on his failed 2012 re-election campaign.
Investigators are also looking into the affairs of an events organisation company called Bygmalion that they suspect of over-billing in order to raise covert money for election campaigning.