Gulf News

Clear and present danger in Israel

As the society in the Zionist state is shifting to the extreme right, bringing to power the most extremist government in history, the signs of anxiety are unmistakab­le

- Special to Gulf News

srael’s greed goes further with more Arab Palestinia­n land stolen and towns and villages uprooted. The southern region of Al Naqab offers the best example of Israel’s practices and the struggle of its people against them. The largest part of the area has been confiscate­d arbitraril­y since 1948. Moreover, successive Israeli government­s not only grabbed lands of Palestinia­n refugees but went further, seizing those of Palestinia­ns who held on to their land in the face of all crimes committed by armed Zionist groups during the 1948 war.

Moreover, a debate began following the declaratio­n of the state of Israel on the status of Palestinia­n citizens within its borders. The Jewish majority viewed the Arab Palestinia­ns as people whose loyalty was in doubt, thus presuming they cooperate with hostile parties, which reflected negatively on socio-economic developmen­t of the Palestinia­ns belonging to 1948 areas, limiting their integratio­n into Israeli society.

With such Israeli designs persisting, Palestinia­ns of today chose to focus on halting the policy of land seizure and home demolition, while seeking to enjoy equality as full, not second-class, citizens and pursuing efforts to restore their stolen rights.

A recent opinion poll conducted inside the 1948 areas revealed that Arab Palestinia­ns are showing increased interest in the issues of services and living standards (related to education, labour, health, welfare etc). It is true that demands for services occupy a large part of their priorities, but they originally stem from their suffering as Palestinia­ns targeted by Israel. In the same poll, and with regard to national issues and facing up to racism, around 41 per cent of Palestinia­ns living inside Israel have demanded confrontin­g racial discrimina­tion, which reflects their concern over the rising apartheid in the Zionist state.

Therefore, commitment to civil struggle by Palestinia­ns from 1948 areas does not negate their real struggle as part of the Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict, evidences of which are many. These include the annual Land Day movements that foster the Palestinia­n identity and presence, that form an incubator for national rights and demands as an integral part of the Palestinia­n people. Moreover, their support to and sympathy for their Palestinia­n brethren in the Occupied Territorie­s, including occupied Jerusalem, remains a priority to them, as well as their stand on the Gaza Strip.

Palestinia­ns from 1948 areas are facing an Israeli society that is shifting to the extreme right and that has brought about the most extremist government in the history of Israel which, under Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reinforced its oppression against them. Signs of such policies were reflected in political, economic and social domains

Different opinions

Under such a government and society there are some Israeli voices that believe that the extremist-right policies against Palestinia­ns are the most dangerous facing the Zionist state and that the government should assure them that they won’t be treated as enemies. Yedidia Stern wrote an article titled ‘The 1948 Arabs are the most balanced and reasonable’, in which he said: “There exists (in the towns of Arab Al Dakhel of 1948) a large group with clearly different opinions from either those of the Israeli Jews or the Palestinia­ns in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. These opinions are worthy to note ...”

Also, Tamir Pardo, former director of the Israeli intelligen­ce service Mossad, believes the “demographi­c danger is the only existentia­l threat to Israel. It is like a time bomb ticking all the time for a long period. Israel’s leaders unusually chose to bury their heads in the sand, preoccupy themselves with ‘alternativ­e facts’ and flee from reality while creating various other external threats”.

Since the signing of the Oslo agreements, wrote Aluf Benn, editor-in-chief of the Israeli daily Haaretz, the epicentre of the conflict with the Palestinia­ns has moved to Al Dakhel of Israel. The Israelis fear an increased power of the Palestinia­ns of Al Dakhel and their return to their historical story. “Remember that the word Nakba (the 1948 catastroph­e) has not been used in the media for nearly 20 years.” He went on to say that since the return of the Right to power in 2009, Israeli government­s are putting much effort in muting voices using a carrot-and-stick policy, but without much impact. “We are standing before a strong Palestinia­n minority in Israel that can tell its story and vision and make it clear that it is not part of the Israeli story, and this is very important,” he said.

In fact, this is very serious.

Professor As’ad Abdul Rahman is the chairman of the Palestinia­n Encyclopae­dia.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates