Court to examine legality of polygamy

Women’s rights groups say ‘nikah halala’ and polygamy are discriminatory

Months after declaring the instant “triple talaq” form of divorce unconstitutional, India’s Supreme Court (SC) yesterday agreed to examine the legal validity of polygamy, as well as “nikah halala” — an Islamic process required to remarry one’s divorced wife.

A Constitution Bench of the court, comprising five of the most senior judges, will next month hear four petitions challenging the legal of the two practices.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay filed a petition, along with two Muslim women and another lawyer from Hyderabad, demanding a ban on polygamy and ‘nikah halala’.

“Banning polygamy and ‘nikah halala’ is the need of the hour to secure basic rights for Muslim women. I know so many women who are victims of polygamy. We want the Supreme Court to look into the plight of thousands of Muslim validity women across the country,” Upadhyay said. Over the years, several women’s rights groups have said the practices of ‘nikah halala’ and polygamy were discriminatory.

Triple talaq judgment

Under ‘nikah halala’, a man cannot remarry his former wife without her going through the process of marrying someone else, consummating that marriage and getting divorced.

Meanwhile, the court yesterday issued notices to the central government and Law Commission asking them to make their stand clear on several such petitions asking for the two practices to be abolished.

The court observed that the five-judge bench which examined instant ‘triple talaq’ last year had kept open the issues of polygamy and ‘nikah halala’.

In its judgment, the top court had described instant ‘triple talaq’ as “bad in law”.

“Instant ‘triple talaq’ is not integral to religious practice and violates constitutional morality,” the court had said.

In August last year, Chief Justice J.S. Khehar had said “we have taken a conscious decision to deal only with triple talaq and not polygamy or ‘nikah halala’”.

The court yesterday issued notices to the central government and Law Commission asking them to make their stand clear on several such petitions asking for the two practices to be abolished.