Gulf News

Hannity’s ethical failure deserves condemnati­on

Fox News must take tough action against its biggest ratings star for his appalling conflict of interest

- By Margaret Sullivan ■ Margaret Sullivan is a noted American journalist and columnist.

Does Fox News deserve the second part of its name? Does it deserve to call itself a news organisati­on? If so — a big if — the cable channel’s brass must discipline its biggest ratings star and apologise to viewers for Sean Hannity’s appalling and undisclose­d conflict of interest revealed. Based on everything we know about Fox, and how it handles issues involving ethics, the chances that the network will do the right thing are small.

To recap: Hannity has, for months, campaigned on his nightly show against special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion of United States President Donald Trump.

When an offshoot of that investigat­ion led to a government raid on Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s office, Hannity went ballistic, ranting about attorney-client privilege and abuse of power. But as of last Monday afternoon, we know that Cohen’s much-discussed secret third client was Hannity himself. You don’t need to be an ethics expert to know that this amounts to a conflict of interest, one that clearly required disclosure to Fox viewers. That never happened.

Fox should do the right thing now: It should address the ethical breach in a public statement, apologise to viewers and discipline Hannity.

At any other major news organisati­on, this would be a fireable offence. (Recall, for comparison, that just months ago, CNN forced out three of its journalist­s for bypassing editorial processes in publishing an article that the network said was flawed.) But knowing what we do about Fox News, that’s extremely unlikely.

For one thing, it’s against Fox’s business interest to back down. Its viewers see it as a champion against the Swamp and the Deep State, and they neither understand nor expect the need for objectivit­y. In fact, this chapter may help Fox to continue pandering to its ratings base.

Second, consider the recent past. This is the network that for years countenanc­ed huge payoffs by its former star host Bill O’Reilly to settle sexual misconduct claims. It’s the network founded by Roger Ailes, who went down in flames after a sexual harassment lawsuit by former Fox host Gretchen Carlson, after years of network stonewalli­ng.

Remember, too, Fox’s handling of the story about Seth Rich, the young Democratic aide whose unsolved slaying on the streets of Washington, D.C., became the topic of unfounded conspiracy theories; that unfounded reporting depicted Rich as the leaker of internal Democratic National Committee emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign. The lies were meant to suggest that the Clinton campaign had a hand in his killing. Hannity fanned the flames hard.

Fox eventually retracted the story, saying it did not meet network standards. But the damage was done. Rich’s parents are suing the network, claiming lasting hurt from “extreme and outrageous” misdeeds.

Last Monday, Hannity downplayed the relationsh­ip with Cohen, saying he never retained him, but merely asked him for legal advice. As Trump’s biggest cheerleade­r, Hannity is a major media figure with the power and the platform to shape public opinion. His relentless efforts to disparage the Mueller investigat­ion are immensely helpful to the president. Fox News doesn’t play by the same rules as most media organisati­ons, often taking remedial action only when forced to by advertiser pressure or other bottom-line considerat­ions.

If that’s the case this time, too, it will finally be time — past time — to drop the second word from the Fox News name.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates