Gulf News

A tale of dispossess­ion:

- BY JUMANA AL TAMIMI Associate Editor

The 1948 Arab-Israel war led to the expulsion of about 800,000 Palestinia­ns. The conflict remains unresolved, 70 years

It has been 70 years, and the Palestinia­n conflict remains unresolved. Since the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, which the Palestinia­ns call the ‘Nakba’ and Israel celebrates as its ‘independen­ce’ day, the Palestinia­ns have recognised Israel, but Israel has not acknowledg­ed their rights.

Today, the Palestinia­n-Israeli conflict seems more distant from a solution than ever before, analysts and politician­s say. “The Nakba has scattered people and deprived them of their homeland; 700,000 people became homeless and more than 500 villages were flattened,” said Ahmad Al Tibi, Leader of the Arab Movement for Change — an Arab party in Israel — and a member of the Knesset.

“The Nakba, its impact and policies have not ended even today. The war of 1967 was part of the [Israeli] expansion, and a continuati­on of colonialis­t [practices] of 1948,” Al Tibi, former adviser to late Palestinia­n president Yasser Arafat, told Gulf News in an interview.

Following the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, Israel captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.

“Despite the 70 years that have passed, [Palestinia­ns continue] to mark Nakba Day. The Palestinia­n generation­s that followed have not lost the appetite to confront the Israeli occupation,” said West Bankbased analyst Jihad Harb.

Commenting on what has changed in the past seven decades for the Palestinia­ns, Harb told Gulf

News, “The Palestinia­ns recognised Israel – an acknowledg­ement of the two-state solution, and they also accepted the United Nations resolution­s, among which was the one related to Israel’s establishm­ent. This happened without any change in the nature of the conflict.”

Harb also noted that the means of struggle “shifted from armed conflict to negotiatio­ns, which occurred amid popular resistance, internatio­nalisation of the cause and the introducti­on of aspects of legality to the Palestinia­n-Israeli conflict”.

The 1948 war started after the Arabs, including the Palestinia­ns, rejected the November 1947 UN General Assembly Resolution 181, which called for the partition of British Mandate Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. On May 14 of that year, the formation of the State of Israel was announced. On the eve of the announceme­nt, four Arab armies – from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Egypt – launched an attack on Tel Aviv. Saudi Arabia sent troops that fought under Egyptian command, according to researcher­s.

Six years ago, Palestinia­n President Mahmoud Abbas said in an interview to Israel’s Channel Two that Arabs made a “mistake” by rejecting the 1947 UN proposal.

“At that time, in 1947, there was Resolution 181, the partition plan, Palestine and Israel. Israel existed. Palestine diminished. Why?” Abbas asked, speaking in English.

However, according to the Israeli historian and socialist activist Ilan Pappe, that was not a mistake.

Though the Palestinia­n liberation movement suffered from issues such as corruption and internal rifts, and it committed “many mistakes” throughout its history, rejecting the Resolution 181 was not one of them, he said. “To the contrary, it was the right decision,” Pappe said.

“I have a feeling that even if the Palestinia­ns did not commit any mistake, they would have found themselves in the same place they are in today,” he was quoted as saying in an interview with Londonbase­d Al Quds Al Arabi newspaper recently.

“That was because the Palestinia­ns faced a strong alliance that no other people could have confronted better than the Palestinia­ns. The US and the European countries told the Palestinia­ns, ‘Now you will pay the price of everything we did to the Jews,” said Pappe, who teaches at the College of Social Sciences and Internatio­nal Studies at the University of Exeter in Britain.

Pappe believes the only way out of the current stalemate is the internatio­nal community standing up to exert pressure on Israel and changing the reality on the ground, but “the world is not ready for that yet”, he said.

Many analysts believe one of the big mistakes the Palestinia­n leadership made was signing the Oslo Accords.

The signing ceremony was held at the White House in September 1993 after months of secret talks in the Norwegian capital. According to the agreement, Israel accepted the Palestinia­n Liberation Organisati­on (PLO) as the sole representa­tive of the Palestinia­n people, and the PLO recognised Israel’s right to exist. The two sides agreed that a Palestinia­n National Authority would be establishe­d and assume governing responsibi­lities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a period of five years. After that, permanent status talks would begin on issues of borders, refugees, and occupied Jerusalem.

However, efforts at peace ran aground only a few years after Oslo.

Twenty-five years since the accords were signed, the final status talks never kicked off.

“It [Oslo] was a successful Israeli manoeuvre to make the occupation more comfortabl­e ... Israel wanted an occupation through other means without any intention of peace and [for] two states … as if Israel was telling the world, ‘Here, the Palestinia­ns are happy. They have a flag in Ramallah and another flag in Gaza and they have given up the right

The Nakba, its impact and policies have not ended even today. The war of 1967 was part of the [Israeli] expansion, and a continuati­on of colonialis­t [practices] of 1948.”

Ahmad Al Tibi |

Leader of the Arab Movement for Change

to return. The Palestinia­n president has signed [the document] and the conflict is over’”, said Pappe.

Commenting on the Oslo Accords and the Israeli recognitio­n of the PLO, Al Tibi said, “At that point in time, the PLO was not at its strongest, [also] the internatio­nal community said it would guarantee the mutual recognitio­n … Undoubtedl­y, the scales are lopsided between a powerful occupation [regime] and a weak Palestinia­n [National] Authority.”

Neverthele­ss, he said, “the Palestinia­n people are strong, and despite everything that has happened, it would be impossible to surrender or give up”.

It remains to be seen what direction the Palestinia­n struggle will take in the future. But Al Tibi and other analysts do not anticipate any progress, especially during the rule of extreme right-wing government­s in Israel. On the contrary, more Israeli extremism and “more apartheid” is expected against the Palestinia­ns, deepening one of the longest unresolved conflicts in modern history.

 ??  ??
 ?? AFP ?? The scene after heavily armed Jewish terrorists attacked the Palestinia­n village of Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948.
AFP The scene after heavily armed Jewish terrorists attacked the Palestinia­n village of Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948.
 ?? AP ?? Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (left) and PLO chairman Yasser Arafat after signing the 1993 peace accords in the presence of US President Bill Clinton in the White House.
AP Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin (left) and PLO chairman Yasser Arafat after signing the 1993 peace accords in the presence of US President Bill Clinton in the White House.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? AP ?? Top: Palestinia­n refugees fleeing their homes in 1948, from the front cover of ‘The Birth of the Palestinia­n Refugee Problem’
AP Top: Palestinia­n refugees fleeing their homes in 1948, from the front cover of ‘The Birth of the Palestinia­n Refugee Problem’
 ??  ??
 ?? Rex Features ?? Left: A 1948 photograph of the Haganah, the Jewish terror group.
Rex Features Left: A 1948 photograph of the Haganah, the Jewish terror group.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates