The virus is hitting the most vulnerable

The coronavirus challenge will provide an impetus for donors and organisations to further innovate

How are people in conflict-torn countries like Yemen, South Sudan and Syria affected by the pandemic? Crowded living conditions and insufficient access to water and health services put many of them at acute risk of infection, while lack of testing may exacerbate the spread of the virus. The covid-19 crisis adds new obstacles to how over-extended humanitarian organisations including UN agencies, the Red Cross/Red Crescent movement, and non-governmental organisations deliver aid to those in need. But the pandemic’s effects on humanitarian aid are likely to extend well beyond the immediate crisis. Here are five ways covid-19 may affect humanitarian aid:

1More people will need help. As of December 2019, an estimated 167.6 million people — 1 in 45 people worldwide — needed some sort of humanitarian assistance. Of these, some 71 million had to flee their homes and are displaced within or outside their countries of origin. And crises — even before the pandemic — tend to last longer than in the past.

Covid-19 is likely to exacerbate existing crises in places like Burkina Faso, and northeast Nigeria, and further tax poorly resourced health systems in places like Venezuela and Congo. The pandemic is also likely to increase the numbers of people in need of aid as local economies suffer, and people lose access to remittances, livelihoods and basic resources. The World Food Programme projects that the number in need of food aid may double — to 265 million — by the end of 2020. Unicef warns that shifting health resources to respond to covid-19 could result in up to 1.2 million extra deaths in children under 5 in the next six months.

2Funding will be even more tight. In 2019 only 63 per cent of needed funding was available to humanitarian organisations. As of the end of April, the United States and other countries had donated only 13 per cent of what humanitarian organisations needed for 2020.

The economic impact of covid-19 on these donor countries may lead to a decrease in aid in the near term. The NF, however, has warned that the magnitude of the economic effects of covid-19 will be significantly more severe than that of recent recessions.

3It may be more difficult to reach those in need. Restrictions on movement aimed at slowing the spread of the virus are already preventing humanitarian agencies from reaching populations in need. Border closures, flight cancellations, lockdowns of ports, and other movement and transport restrictions mean that aid workers and supplies cannot get to those who need them. For example, a governmentmandated lockdown of Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh prevented 80 per cent of aid personnel from doing their work in the camps. Aid groups are advocating for increased access and reduced restrictions for humanitarian work, and for increased funds to safeguard humanitarian supply chains.

4Non-coronavirus issues may take a back Crises, including disease outbreaks, affect women and men differently due to differences in gender norms and roles, and they exacerbate gender inequalities.

There is some evidence that intimate partner violence has been increasing with the implementation of Covid-19 control measures — while access to assistance has been decreasing. Intimate partner violence is the most common form of gender-based violence in humanitarian crises.

Despite high rates of gender-based violence in emergencies, a review of humanitarian funding data from 2016-2018 by VOICE and the International Rescue Committee found that only .01 per cent of all humanitarian funding was for work related to gender-based violence. Two-thirds of humanitarian programmes to address this violence received no funding.

5Local organisations will play an increased aid role. In 2016, the UN convened the World Humanitarian Summit, which brought together humanitarian organisations and others to help reimagine and reshape humanitarian aid. One outcome of that meeting and related processes was a commitment to work towards giving greater power and more resources to local organisations to shape and lead humanitarian responses.

While some countries have made progress towards this type of “localisation,” overall the summit’s targets have not been met. But the border and financial restrictions may now result in reduced international capacity and staffing. The shift to greater reliance on local groups is not without challenges. In the short term, international humanitarian organisations have adjusted their relationships with local groups to continue their efforts during the pandemic.

Crises create challenges as well as opportunities. But this emergency may also provide the impetus for humanitarian donors and organisations to innovate and to accelerate reform efforts.