Gulf News

A historic win in US for Palestinia­n backer

Upstart Jamaal Bowman, who has called for justice for people of Palestine, defeats party-backed Congressma­n in New York Democratic primary

- BY JAMES J. ZOGBY | Dr James J. Zogby is the president of Arab American Institute, a non-profit, non-partisan national leadership organisati­on.

On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, Jamaal Bowman made history by winning the Democratic Party primary in New York State’s 16th Congressio­nal District. Here’s why his victory is so significan­t.

Bowman beat Eliot Engel, a 16-term incumbent Congressma­n who served as Chair of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and had the backing of nearly the entire Democratic Party establishm­ent, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and ran on an unabashedl­y progressiv­e platform that included support for Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. He was outspent by a margin of two to one. And because Bowman had taken positions calling for justice for Palestinia­ns, “dark money” pro-Israel super-PAC’s spent an additional $2,000,000 in independen­t expenditur­es in an effort to tear down his character and defeat him. Despite all of these challenges, Jamaal Bowman won, sending the message that change is on the way.

Bowman’s victory against an entrenched incumbent came on the heels of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s 2018 unseating of 10-term Congressma­n Joseph Crowley in the nearby 14th District of New York. There were similariti­es between the two races and some important difference­s.

Both Ocasio-Cortez and Bowman are young people of colour who defeated older white men whose constituen­ts in their congressio­nal districts are majority minority voters. And because both of the young winners were community activists who had developed strong grassroots networks and the incumbent Members of Congress they were challengin­g had grown lazy and entitled, assuming their victories were assured, Bowman and OcasioCort­ez represente­d both generation­al change and the importance of maintainin­g direct contact with the voters one seeks to represent.

Progressiv­e agenda

Both of these upstart candidates were members of the DSA, running on a progressiv­e agenda that promoted universal health care, a quality education, a decent job, a clean environmen­t, and affordable housing as fundamenta­l human rights. Both were endorsed by Senator Bernie Sanders (Bowman was also endorsed by Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Elizabeth Warren), while Crowley and Engel had the support of the Democratic leadership in the

Senate and House of Representa­tives. As such, they represent the insurgent left’s victories over the party’s centrist establishm­ent.

While both of the defeated Members of Congress relied largely on large donations from big donors or political action committees to fund their campaigns, Bowman and Ocasio-Cortez raised their campaign funds from individual small donors — replicatin­g the approach taken by Sanders in his 2016 and 2020 presidenti­al runs. Their wins were victories for campaign finance reform.

Ocasio-Cortez’s victory was a shock that caught both Crowley and the Democratic establishm­ent by surprise. Determined that it wouldn’t happen again, New York State’s Governor, its two Senators, the Speaker of the House of Representa­tives, and Clinton (in her only endorsemen­t of the 2020 election) all lined up behind Engel. By winning against this formidable line-up, Bowman demonstrat­ed that the progressiv­e wave isn’t a fluke.

Because Bowman was running against the very pro-Israel Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the party’s establishm­ent and the pro-Israel lobby didn’t want a replay of the Ocasio-Cortez win, they invested heavily in the effort to defeat Bowman.

Despite the money spent against him, Bowman never wavered. A week before the election, he was challenged by a rabbi from Riverdale, an affluent neighbourh­ood in his district. In an “open letter” published in the Riverdale Press, the rabbi expressed his concern that Bowman was espousing anti-Israel views and made a number of rhetorical­ly inflammato­ry charges — with Palestinia­n terrorism mentioned in seven consecutiv­e paragraphs.

Bowman refused to accept the bait and instead responded in a deeply respectful “open letter” of his own in which he made clear his views on foreign policy, including the Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict, “are rooted in the values of human dignity” and his life experience­s. In one moving passage, he noted:

“The uprising across the country against police violence also makes me empathise with the everyday experience and fear that comes with living under occupation. Just as the police force is an intimidati­ng force in so many black communitie­s, I can connect to what it feels like for Palestinia­ns to feel the presence of the military in their daily lives in the West Bank... I believe Palestinia­ns have the same rights to freedom and dignity as my Jewish brothers and sisters. I will fight for their liberation just as hard as I will fight for yours.”

In the end, not only did Jamaal Bowman win, he won by a decisive margin carrying all areas of his district and all major demographi­c groups. Interestin­gly, from vote tallies I’ve seen, he also beat Engel in precincts that were heavily Jewish. This is yet another reason why Jamaal Bowman’s victory was historic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates