Gulf News

Ayodhya temple: Another feather in Modi’s cap

With the groundbrea­king ceremony, BJP proves a point with political aggrandise­ment

- BY SANJIB KUMAR DAS | Assistant Editor

A31-year wait finally came to an end on Wednesday in India. And when India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) stalwart and Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid that 22.6kg silver brick, marking the groundbrea­king ceremony for the constructi­on of a new Ram Temple in Ayodhya, in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP), it was probably be the single-biggest marker of emancipati­on of a nationalis­t Hindu identity in a country that constituti­onally still remains secular.

The Supreme Court verdict last year, clearing the decks for the constructi­on of a Ram Temple at the 2.77 acre disputed site in Ayodhya, that was also home to the iconic Babri Masjid, until its desecratio­n and destructio­n on December 6, 1992, marked the culminatio­n of process that had actually been set rolling by former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. In 1985, the Rajiv-led Congress government at the Centre had taken two crucial decisions. First was over the issue of the practice of alimony in the Shah Bano case, in which Rajiv went against the apex court’s decision that repudiated Shah Bano was entitled to alimony from her husband. This was followed by the then prime minister’s one of the most controvers­ial decisions and that was to open the locks to the Ramjanmabh­hoomi-Babri Masjid site.

Opening the locks to disputed shrine

While no one had hardly offered any namaz (prayer) at the masjid for ages, a priest would perform religious rites at the temple only once a year. By ordering the opening of the locks to the disputed site, the Rajiv-led government had blatantly pandered to Hindu fundamenta­list and rightist sentiments, just as it had sought to appease Muslim zealots by enacting a law to abolish the provision of alimony in the community. As luck would have it, Rajiv’s decisions backfired. In the 1989 general elections, Congress was voted out of power, with a major chunk of the Muslim vote siding with the new secular formation under V.P. Singh’s Janata Dal and the rise of Hindu fundamenta­list sentiments in the Cow Belt (northern India) finding its most potent receptacle in postindepe­ndent India in the form of the BJP.

The dice cast by Rajiv was the surest and most definitive invocation to religious fundamenta­lism and appeasemen­t of a majoritari­an sentiment in India’s socio-political history. Rajiv’s invocation to a cultural hubris and political nihilism have by default landed the saffron brigade, namely the BJP, a windfall! Since the opening of the locks to the disputed site, the demolition of the mosque and the consequent communal riots across India helped the BJP build its own vote bank.

Starting with BJP doyen Lal

Krishna Advani’s infamous Rathyatra (chariot ride) in October 1990 to the Supreme Court verdict on the disputed site last year, what the BJP leadership has done very astutely is to try and coalesce the fundamenta­list sentiments surroundin­g a Hindu nationalis­t agenda and convert that coalition of sentiments into an electoral success story.

A long-cherished dream

Interestin­gly, what the saffron brigade has managed to do through its rightist propaganda machinery is to try and present a curated image of Ram as a proponent of and symbol for Hindu nationalis­m. It is truly fascinatin­g to note here that during this correspond­ent’s extensive travel across India, in the run-up to the 2014 general elections, several members from the minority community had said that for them Ram doesn’t necessaril­y have to be a Hindu deity. Ram would rather be a conceptual construct for the pursuit of all that’s just and fair in life. That Ram is a concept that does not need to be pigeon-holed into a straitjack­et of religion. But what the saffron brigade has managed to achieve is the complete antithesis of that universall­y acceptable image of Ram by an extensive campaign to try and deity-fy Ram as an icon of muscular Hinduism.

With the groundbrea­king ceremony of a longcheris­hed shrine, the BJP has proved a major point with political aggrandise­ment: That it has now kept almost every single crucial policy parameter and socio-political vision statement as mentioned in its election manifesto since 1984 – the first general election when BJP came into being. Particular­ly in the second term of the Modiled dispensati­on at the Centre, the prime policy objectives right from abolishing triple talaq to abrogation of Article 370 in Kashmir to Citizenshi­p Amendment Act to building of a Ram temple, have all been now met.

Advantage Modi and BJP

This will definitely give the BJP the kind of bragging rights that few political parties in India’s history have enjoyed. In that sense, this is a massive shot in the arm for India’s ruling party – that the chant of “Mandir wohi banayengey” (will build the temple right there) is now no longer a chant, it’s a clarion call that has metamorpho­sed into a Can-Do machismo.

How well a new India identifies itself with that machismo and what meaning it makes of it will be the thread to follow in the days ahead. Whether for the common man it will be a question of “So What” or “What Next” only time will tell. But for now, it’s Advantage Modi and BJP.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates