Court dismisses petition on Taj Mahal, raps petitioner
Petition cited claims of historians about mausoleum being an old Shiva temple
The Allahabad High Court’s Lucknow bench yesterday dismissed the petition seeking opening of 22 rooms in the Taj Mahal premises.
The two-judge bench ripped into the petitioner who sought opening of the 22 locked rooms, stating that the truth about the iconic monument needs to come out, and that he has filed multiple PILs for the same.
“Tomorrow you will ask for permission to see our chambers. Please, don’t make mockery of the PIL system,” the bench said.
Locked rooms
The writ petition, seeking to “find the truth” behind the 22 locked rooms, was filed last week before the Lucknow bench by Rajneesh Singh, who is the media in-charge of the BJP’s Ayodhya unit.
The petition cited the claims of some historians and Hindu groups about the mausoleum actually being an old Shiva temple. The petition has sought the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) form a special committee to examine the locked rooms and release the report to the public.
Singh said that the demand is not to make the Taj Mahal a temple but to bring out the truth of the matter for the sake of social harmony.
Justices D.K. Upadhyay and Subhash Vidyarthi questioned the petitioner on what his plea is. Pointing out that the petitioner wants the court to issue a writ of mandamus, they stated it can only be issued in case of infringement of rights.
“What judgement do you want us to pronounce? Who built the Taj Mahal? Don’t go into historical facts … Mandamus can only be issued when rights have been infringed. What rights of yours have been infringed?” the bench asked.
‘Go and do P.hD’
The petitioner said he is asking for a fact-finding committee to be constituted to get to the bottom of the issue and reiterated his demand to be allowed access to the 22 rooms as the “truth” needs to emerge about the Taj Mahal,” he said.
The bench responded sharply, saying: “Who are you asking the information from? If you are not satisfied that the rooms have been closed for security reasons, use your remedies in law to challenge that. Do some research first — do MA, Ph.D, enrol yourself somewhere. Don’t make a mockery of this.” Several right-wing organisations claim Taj Mahal to be Tejo Mahalaya, a Hindu temple.
Tomorrow you [the petitioner] will ask for permission to see our chambers. Please, don’t make mockery of the PIL system.”
Allahabad High Court’s Lucknow bench
Periodic repairs
The ASI sealed the chambers and blocked the staircases leading to pathways in the basements more than three decades ago. While officials claim periodic repairs and maintenance work are undertaken in the basement, conservationists fear that the underground chambers may not have been opened for a significantly long time to avoid brewing controversies relating to its original ownership.
Local historians are more concerned with the safety of the Taj that attracts millions of tourists round the year. “If the sealed chambers are opened for public view, it would be possible to undertake conservational work, if required, as there were unconfirmed reports of minor cracks and termite colonies in some parts of the foundation. We need to be assured that all is well with the foundation which could be affected by the toxic and polluted water of the river Yamuna,” said a conservationist.