Gulf News

Princess of Wales breaks cancer stigma

Thanks to huge advances in medicine, not every cancer diagnosis is a death sentence

- BY NIDHI RAZDAN | Special to Gulf News ■ Nidhi Razdan is an award-winning journalist. She has extensivel­y reported on politics and diplomacy.

When Catherine, Princess of Wales, formerly Kate Middleton, broke the news of her cancer diagnosis to the world on March 22, there was shock, sympathy and also plenty of anger at the rather distastefu­l circus of rumours that had plagued the British royal family for weeks before that. In sections of the media and across social media in particular, conspiracy theories swirled and spread. Was she dead? Was she divorcing William? Was something even more sinister happening?

The video statement finally put an end to the absurd theories as Kate bravely talked about receiving preventati­ve chemothera­py and appealed for privacy as she and her family deal with her treatment. The question is: Will the media now leave her alone? Social media is a different kind of monster where some conspiracy theories still reign.

The story also leads us to reflect on a much larger debate: Are public figures entitled to privacy about their health? Yes, but its also complicate­d because in this social media driven world, public figures often don’t have the luxury of keeping things totally private.

In Kate’s case, I believe the palace could have handled things much better by being more open about her health right at the beginning. Today the Princess faces an outpouring of support from all over the world and I suspect people will largely leave her alone.

Cancer is a dreaded disease and how one chooses to process a diagnosis or share it with others is entirely one’s own choice. Thanks to huge advances in medicine, not every cancer diagnosis is a death sentence and millions do recover and live well. But it is still news one would never want. Which is why Princess Catherine now needs to be left to recover on her own time. We need to stop speculatin­g on her condition and let her be.

The issue of public figures and their health however acquires a different dimension when we look at constituti­onal figures or those in power. In the US, details of the President’s annual physical are made public. People have a right to know if those that they elect to office are able to do their job properly. The health of 81-year-old Joe Biden has also become a major election issue. \

In late February, Biden’s doctor conducted his physical exam and stated he “continues to be fit for duty”, while giving details of his sleep apnea device and some hip discomfort. We also know Biden works out five times a week. Some may ask — do we really need to know all these details? I believe those who run for office or hold office cannot claim complete privacy and should be more transparen­t about their health.

I do believe it helps when celebritie­s speak up about their health issues because people become more aware about a disease, about getting regular check ups, like with breast cancer where early screening and self exams have become life savers. It also helps in removing stigmas surroundin­g many illnesses.

Public figures don’t have to share these details with us but I do think it helps. Ultimately, the decision lies with them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates