Khaleej Times

Is Theresa May handling Brexit well? Maybe not

- Tom Whyman GEOPOLITIC­S

After Prime Minister Theresa May gave a bullish speech last month outlining her plans for Britain’s negotiatio­ns to leave the European Union, the front page of The Daily Mail, a right-wing tabloid, displayed a triumphant cartoon depicting May, head thrust proudly into the air, standing on the edge of what I assume is one of the White Cliffs of Dover. The Union Jack flew behind her as she trampled a European Union flag. This image resembled nothing more than “The Rhodes Colossus,” a famous jingoistic cartoon from 1892 in which the racist, empire-building diamond tycoon Cecil Rhodes stood similarly astride Africa, from Cairo to Cape Town. “We’ll walk away from a bad deal — and make EU pay,” read the text beside the illustrati­on, as if the Lord Kitchener Wants You poster had been blessed with the eloquence of May’s new best friend, Donald J. Trump. But was she supposed to look like she was about to jump off that cliff? Sober analysts agree that May’s plans are deeply foolish. Her intention is to sacrifice Britain’s membership in the European single market, something necessary for the economy to function as it is now configured, to gain full control over immigratio­n policy, which is not. In short, she is planning to profoundly alienate key industries and trading partners to score populist popularity points.

Parliament will be afforded little oversight in relation to the process and frankly doesn’t seem interested in opposing it, no matter how extreme May’s plans are. The House of Commons voted recently to give itself as little power as possible to reject whatever terms May eventually puts to it, a bizarre move for a legislativ­e body in an apparently functionin­g liberal democracy. The prime minister’s Brexit plans will alienate Britain’s regions as well: Scotland saw support for independen­ce spike after the June 23 referendum result, while in Northern Ireland there are profound fears over what Brexit will mean for the Good Friday Agreement.

All this domestic turmoil is indicative of the way in which Brexit goes to the heart of Britain’s national identity. Brexit is rooted in imperial nostalgia and myths of British exceptiona­lism, coming up as they have — especially since 2008 — against the reality that Britain is no longer a major world power.

This is evident in May’s rhetoric. Her Brexit speech, for instance, invited us to imagine the “Global Britain” that will somehow emerge once the country has left the EU, its citizens “instinctiv­ely” looking, as she has claimed the British do, to expand their horizons beyond Europe and exploit opportunit­ies across the world. This is simply a sanitised version of the dream of a British Empire.

The bullishnes­s of the Brexiteers represents a progressio­n from an earlier era of revived empire nostalgia that might be described as the “Keep Calm and Carry On” era. From the mid-2000s, tropes such as the titular wartime posters, alongside a rediscover­ed love for old-timey delicacies like tea, cupcakes and gin, offered a retreat from a world made freshly hostile to the middle class by the global financial crisis.

These tropes abide today — but they have ceased acting merely as a shelter, for those who live surrounded by them, against politics. They have now become an active, transforma­tive political force. It’s the UK Independen­ce Party leader Paul Nuttall, striding about in a tweed jacket and matching hat like a Victorian country squire. It’s the Brexit secretary David Davis, responding to complaints from the Civil Service that it lacks the budget to deal with the logistics of leaving the EU by invoking the blitz spirit of World War II. It’s the foreign secretary Boris Johnson saying that France’s president, François Hollande, “wants to administer punishment beatings to anyone who chooses to escape, rather in the manner of some WW II movie.” Those most under the spell of imperial nostalgia have now become the sorcerers themselves, having somehow managed to conjure up a mandate to transform Britain in their image.

But no matter how confident the Brexiteers might be, their grip on reality remains patchy at best. Global Britain’s delusions are unlikely to withstand the shock of actually leaving the EU. One indication of this came shortly after the referendum result, when it emerged that Marmite, an iconic British food, was actually owned by a Dutch company, Unilever. Its prices are set to go up after Britain leaves the EU. Andrea Leadsom, the minister for the environmen­t, food and rural affairs, has indicated that Britain’s post-Brexit trade strategy will be primarily based around the export of jam, biscuits and cheese. Britain, it seems, is in danger of becoming the world’s largest church fete.

Still, May will probably be able to carry the public with her. So what’s going to happen? These days, it feels like the worst-case scenario always prevails. If that happens this time, too, Brexit will mean that England, shorn of Scotland, Northern Ireland and maybe even Wales, contracts into a small, isolated, one-party state governed by schoolteac­herly Conservati­ves who persist in wild-eyed delusions about their country’s special grandeur. In this desperate fantasy Britain, there are no jobs, and any dissent — from disseminat­ing pro-foreigner propaganda to having a nonregulat­ion haircut — will be punished by forced participat­ion in the “Clean for the Queen” programme.

All of this might sound bizarre, over-the-top, even actively demented. But if what the Brexiteers want is to return Britain to a utopia they have devised by splicing a few rosetinted memories of the 1950s together with an understand­ing of imperial history derived largely from images on vintage biscuit tins, then all of this seems chillingly plausible, insofar as it would, in many ways, constitute the realizatio­n of that dream. Viva Britannia! — Tom Whyman is an academic philosophe­r and freelance writer. —NYT

Brexit is rooted in imperial nostalgia and myths of British exceptiona­lism, coming up as they have — especially since 2008 — against the reality that Britain is no longer a major world power.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates