Khaleej Times

Wear What you Want

Why should you follow a diktat for dressing? By all means, kick your heels up

- Julia Baird

I adore the funky grandmothe­rs you can find on Instagram who dance about in baubles and proudly sport turbans

Once, while I was looking at an apricotcol­oured vintage dress at a stall on the Upper West Side in New York, imagining myself in it on the Riviera, my former partner whispered in my ear: “You know, there comes a day when wearing old-lady dresses is no longer ironic.” Ouch. I was 36. And apparently not even a lamb dressed as mutton, but fast approachin­g mutton dressing as jerky — if we accept that the way women dress can be likened to the life stages of a sheep. Deflated, I left that pretty dress hanging on the wire fence surroundin­g those markets on West 76th. But I still wear vintage. So what does it actually mean to dress like an ‘old lady’? Or even just ‘dress your age’? Women are more often criticised for dressing like younger, not older, versions of themselves. When you reach 40, you’re suddenly inundated with advice about ‘age-appropriat­e’ wear. It is worth pointing out that one of the first recorded uses of ‘mutton dressed as lamb’ was to praise, not ridicule, hot older women. The phrase is attributed in a lady’s journal of 1811 to the future king of England George IV, who, when still a prince, was asked at a ball if he found a particular girl pretty. He snorted with derision: “Girl! Girls are not to my taste. I don’t like lamb; but mutton dressed like lamb!” Women are not praised for dressing like fabulous young things now. As we ascend the ladder of wisdom and maturity, we are cautioned to adopt restraint, to be ‘classic,’ ‘sophistica­ted,’ to eschew skin in favor of prim. And with every passing year, to occupy less space and be more demure — and dull. We are also told to monitor our appearance in a way men are very rarely told to. Find me a man leafing through a magazine that tells him to upturn his collar to hide his neck wrinkles, and I will upturn it for him. As one fashion guru advised women: “The worst thing you can do is to dress younger than you are.” The worst thing! So bad, apparently, that The Daily Mail claimed that 80 per cent of Britons thought women should “start dressing down” when they turned 50. As a result, the survey found that a quarter of women over 50 are “scared of wearing high heels.” After 40, we should, says a British fashion writer in The Telegraph, use plenty of conditione­r on our hair and not risk a radical trim because “a bob at this stage could put a decade on you.” Yikes! The author goes on to say a maxi skirt can also add “10 years.” Which means: Get a haircut and the wrong dress, and bang — you’re 60.

A website named Lifescript also recently chided women over 40 who wore tank tops, low-rise jeans, platform heels, bangles and big earrings with the question: “Are you a middle-aged fashionist­a who just doesn’t know when to quit?”

Finally, we are told to smile more. “The sulky, not bothered expression which you may think cool (see Victoria Beckham) will in your 40s start to look sour,” writes The Telegraph’s adviser. The answer? “Perk it up.” This is mutton shaming, ladies, and it has to stop. Very occasional­ly, we are given permission to reveal glimpses of our fleshly selves. A stylist in Harper’s Bazaar advises that muttonladi­es may still reveal morsels of skin — collarbone­s, wrists and the back of the neck are safe “candidates for display.”

“All the places you’d wear perfume and would like to be kissed,” says the stylist. “It’s about being adored, not ravaged.”

All this nonsense is why I adore the funky grandmothe­rs you can find on Instagram who dance about in baubles and proudly sport turbans. They refuse to fade, hide or match their attire to the wallpaper.

But my greatest muttonfant­asy is just to wear and do what I want. To not have such preoccupat­ions even cross my mind. Isn’t there a point when one can simply be a dowager, a grand old dame, or just a merry old boiler? When we can refuse to kowtow to prescripti­ons and permission­s, but just march on in the shoes — we — fancy wearing?

Queen Victoria ditched those suffocatin­g corsets without blinking, much to the horror of her doctor. Instead, she wore exactly what she liked for half-a-century: mourningbl­ack, with diamonds. Hillary Clinton is another such, in her pantsuits.

I have long savoured the prospect of letting myself go. It’s just the most delicious concept: a balloon wafting into the ether, a raft flowing smoothly with the current. One day, I have imagined… I might bump into an old acquaintan­ce who would regard me with concern. “Oh,” I would exclaim, with an easy laugh, and, touching her arm, say: “I thought you might have known. I’ve let myself go!”

I would saunter off, dangerousl­y liberated, feeling envious eyes on my back — having reached, finally, the age when you can reject rejection.

— The New York Times

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? ROCKING IT: Cher, Iris Apfel (top), and Shirley Maclaine (right) show us how it’s done
ROCKING IT: Cher, Iris Apfel (top), and Shirley Maclaine (right) show us how it’s done
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates