Khaleej Times

US tax plan eyes profit repatriati­on

-

washington — The sweeping tax cuts adopted on Wednesday by US lawmakers while reducing rates on corporatio­ns, also aim to encourage multinatio­nal businesses to repatriate huge earnings amassed abroad.

US corporatio­ns, notably in the tech and pharmaceut­ical sectors, have for years accumulate­d profits offshore to avoid the comparativ­ely high US tax rates of 35 per cent, although most companies in reality pay much less.

The stockpile of cash now stands at about $2.5 trillion, according to the congressio­nal Joint Committee on Taxation.

In 2016, for example, Apple stashed more than $200 billion abroad, while Microsoft parked $100 billion, and Cisco, Oracle and General Electric all followed suit.

Some firms resorted to so-called corporate inversions, reverse mergers allowing them to be incorporat­ed in low-tax countries, avoiding the US tax system altogether.

Last year, several inversion efforts, including the merger attempt by drug companies Pfizer and Allergan, drew the ire of American officials.

By dropping the top corporate rate to 21 per cent from 35 per cent and taxing only profits earned on US territory, the reform represents an effort to make the United States more enticing to major corporatio­ns.

“Money frozen overseas and in parts of the world and some of them don’t even like us,” President Donald Trump said on Wednesday in remarks celebratin­g the tax bill’s passage. “And they had the money. Now they won’t have the money long.”

To help encourage earnings repatriati­on, the tax package includes a one-time, across-the-board tax break for companies that bring the cash back.

Businesses will have to make a one-time payment of eight per cent or 15.5 per cent on repatriate­d foreign profits, depending on whether the assets are cash or investment­s. This could bring $220 billion to the Treasury, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

But Eric Toder, co-director of the Tax Policy Centre, said this particular policy measure would reward overseas investment.

“We are taxing them less on their foreign profits than on their US profits if they invest in low-tax countries,” he told AFP.

After the tax bill is enacted, foreign profits will be taxed at a minimum of 10.5 per cent — including amounts collected by local authoritie­s — a level well below the 21 per cent US rate.

Toder said congressio­nal scorekeepe­rs were assuming the lower taxes would result in higher revenues, given the larger volume of repatriate­d profits. But this still encourages companies to invest abroad, he said.

“They have an incentive to report and invest income in low tax countries.”

Industrial companies, such as makers of semiconduc­tors, an industry prone to off-shoring like many that trade in intellectu­al property, welcomed the new rules.

“We would have preferred lower repatriati­on rates but overall it’s a strong bill for the semiconduc­tor industry,” Joe Pasetti, a senior lobbyist at the Semiconduc­tor Industry Associatio­n, told AFP.

The tax plan also aims to encourage companies to be active again on US soil, in particular those in IPreliant industries, he explains.

US revenues derived from foreign sales of patented products will be processed for tax purposes as if they were earned by foreign subsidiari­es, at a rate of 10.5 per cent rather than the new corporate rate of 21 per cent.

“It’s really competitiv­e, much more competitiv­e than the current system,” Pasetti said.

The US Chamber of Commerce believes the benefits will be shared widely following the disappeara­nce of the “outdated” former tax system.

“Our tax system will now welcome capital within our borders for myriad uses such as job creation, wage growth and investment,” Caroline Harris, vicepresid­ent for tax policy at the chamber, told AFP.

However, critics are sceptical the higher profits will be used for those purposes.

In 2004, under then-president George W. Bush, Congress approved a similar tax break to encourage the repatriati­on of profits, and companies brought back about $312 billion, subject to a 5.3 per cent rate.

But studies showed these funds were in large part used for share buybacks rather than for investment­s. — AFP

 ??  ??
 ?? — AFP ?? Customers at an Apple store in Florida. In 2016, Apple stashed more than $200 billion abroad.
— AFP Customers at an Apple store in Florida. In 2016, Apple stashed more than $200 billion abroad.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Arab Emirates